Two short notes. It is important to realise that Monsignor Sequeri is a musician with no special competency in the fields of family life and sexual morality. He was appointed as part of Francis' deliberate destruction of the John Paul II Pontifical Theological Institute for Marriage and Family Sciences (not to be confused with the John Paul II Academy for Human Life and the Family, an actually Catholic body, not under Papal direction).
Secondly, the reference to Monsignor Sequeri as a '68 ideologist' means simply that he is a member of the revolutionary, left-wing generation that tried to overthrow Western society in 1968.
Secondly, the reference to Monsignor Sequeri as a '68 ideologist' means simply that he is a member of the revolutionary, left-wing generation that tried to overthrow Western society in 1968.
 |
| Picture: © American Life League, CC BY-NC, #newsBhfkttcmdl |
Monsignor Pierangelo Sequeri, uttered many empty words during a conference in Milan (May 10) in order to undermine the intention and content of Paul VI's encyclical Humanae Vitae (1968).
An example: Sequeri said that Humanae Vitae's “sapiential side” - whatever this is - was “the nexus of the concept of parental responsibility”[?].
Sequeri, a musician, was imposed by Pope Francis as the president of the [ruined] Roman John Paul II Family Institute although or because he is incompetent in the field.
His strategy during the talk was obvious: He praised Humanae Vitae while at the same time distracting from its main focus, the prohibition of artificial contraception which the Bergoglio party wants to cancel.
Like Pope Francis, Sequeri is a 68 ideologist who belongs to the past. The Church that belongs to God, aims at increasing the number of her children, not at diminishing it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.