23 August 2026

Summa Contra Gentiles, Book II: LXII Against the Opinion of Alexander About the Possible Intellect



Saint Thomas Aquinas (1225 – 7 March 1274), was a Doctor of the Church, Philosopher, Theologian, Jurist, Dominican Friar, and Priest. Known as Doctor Angelicus "Angelic Doctor," and the Doctor Communis "Universal Doctor" his writings serve as a defense and proof of the validity of Christ's authority over all. The Summa contra Gentiles (also known as Liber de veritate catholicae fidei contra errores infidelium, "Book on the truth of the Catholic faith against the errors of the unbelievers"). The Summa contra Gentiles consists of four books. The structure of Saint Thomas's work is designed to proceed from general philosophical arguments for monotheism, to which Muslims and Jews are likely to consent even within their own respective religious traditions, before progressing to the discussion of specifically Christian doctrine.

Book II is dedicated to the Creation (in other words, the physical universe, everything which exists). Whether you are a history enthusiast, a student of religion, or simply curious about the impact of the Roman Catholic Church on the world, this playlist is designed to provide an informative and engaging journey through its captivating past. Subscribe to the Contemplating History channel for more educational content and immerse yourself in the rich tapestry of history.

Transhumanism and AI Ethics (Interview with C. R. Wiley)

From a protestant source.

The Holy Rosary

Sunday, the Glorious Mysteries, in Latin with Cardinal Burke.

Digging Up Anne Boleyn and Others | Burials in the Chapel of St Peter ad Vincula

From History Calling


In 1876, the Chapel of St. Peter Ad Vincula in the Tower of London was in need of serious repairs. This meant DIGGING UP ANNE BOLEYN and others who had been buried under its floor, including her brother, George Boleyn, sister-in-law Jane Boleyn and cousin (and fifth wife of Henry VIII) Queen Katherine Howard. In today’s History Calling video we’re going to look at what happened when the Victorians disturbed the burials in the Chapel of St. Peter Ad Vincula and at what the detailed description left of what were supposed to be Anne Boleyn’s remains can tell us about the woman herself, including some physical traits her daughter Elizabeth I may have inherited from her. In particular her skull will provide some tantalising extra details about the appearance of Anne Boleyn, for whom no contemporary portraits survive. We’ll also look at the evidence which suggests that this excavation was not the first to disturb the remains of the fallen queens and the others who lie beneath the chapel and at why no exhumation has taken place in the years since, nor is one likely. Finally we’ll consider how likely it is that the correct remains were identified and explore why Katherine Howard’s bones were not found. Other details about Anne Boleyn’s skeleton will also include a discussion of her height and even her finger bones. This video serves as a sequel to my previous videos entitled ‘Anne Boleyn’s execution: Hollywood vs History’ and ‘The death of Katherine Howard and Jane Boleyn’.

Neurobiology of Emotions and the Evidence of Human Interconnectedness Sonsoles de Lacalle, MD, PhD (Ohio University)

From The Society of Catholic Scientists

Leo XIV at Lourdes: All Rupnik Mosaics Will Be Covered

Covered? Just remove the abusive monster's "art"! It's ugly anyway. I won't even display it on Musings of an Old Curmudgeon; it's hideous.

From Aleteia

The imposing artworks at the shrine will be hidden for the Pope's upcoming September visit and remain covered as a commission decides their permanent fate.

uring Pope Leo XIV’s upcoming visit to Lourdes at the end of September, the shrine will cover all of the mosaics by Marko Rupnik that adorn the facade of the Basilica of Our Lady of the Rosary. The spaces will be decorated specifically for the Holy Father’s visit. Bishop Jean-Marc Micas of Tarbes and Lourdes announced the measure to the local newspaper La Nouvelle République des Pyrénées on August 20. He added that the artworks will remain hidden even after the Pope’s departure.

“The Holy Father coming to Lourdes is the occasion for taking a step forward on this subject,” Bishop Micas said. “All the works on the facade will be covered and then decorated in connection with Leo XIV’s apostolic journey.”

This change will not be limited to the few days the sovereign pontiff is present. Bishop Micas clearly indicated that the artworks will not be unveiled once Pope Leo XIV has left.

“The mosaics will remain covered after the Holy Father’s pilgrimage, at the end of which a new process of reflection is going to begin,” he said. “The current commission will be enlarged, notably mixing artists and theologians, in order to reflect on the future of the facade of the basilica.”

Putting victims first

Behind this decision is a painful issue that has occupied the shrine for several years. Marko Rupnik and his workshop created these mosaics in 2008 for the 150th anniversary of the Marian apparitions. However, the internationally renowned Slovenian priest and mosaicist has been accused by numerous women, primarily religious sisters, of sexual, spiritual, and psychological abuse dating back to the 1990s. Following a canonical investigation, he was permanently expelled from the Society of Jesus in July 2023. He has also been banned from all public artistic activity.

The presence of his artwork in a shrine that welcomes millions of pilgrims each year — including many ill, vulnerable, and wounded individuals — has become particularly sensitive.

“My role is to ensure that the shrine welcomes everyone, and most particularly those who suffer,” Bishop Micas explained. “Among them, there are people who are victims of abuse and sexual assault, children as well as adults. However, since the revelations of the serious accusations targeting Father Marko Rupnik, it has become difficult, even impossible, for these victims to come.”

For the bishop, the core vocation of Lourdes requires putting these individuals first. “The tried and wounded persons who have need of consolation and reparation must hold the first place at Lourdes,” he noted. “It’s the grace proper to this shrine: Nothing must prevent them from responding to the message of Our Lady inviting them to come there in pilgrimage.”

A process underway since 2023

This latest decision, announced ahead of Pope Leo XIV’s visit, marks a new step in a process that began in 2023 when a commission was created to discern the future of the mosaics. In the summer of 2024, Bishop Micas decided to stop highlighting the artworks during the evening Marian procession's light shows. Then, in March 2025, the mosaics located on the basilica's entrance doors were covered.

With the Pope’s upcoming visit, the various mosaics on the facade will now disappear from view. It is a choice that Bishop Micas believes carries a significance extending far beyond the Slovenian artist's specific case. “There are works by Rupnik everywhere in the world, and much bigger ones,” the bishop concluded. “Yet, people only speak of those at Lourdes. This underlines the symbolic dimension of the message of Lourdes in relation to victims of sexual violence. And it thus gives us a unique responsibility.”

While Lourdes does have a particular challenge in regard to Rupnik's mosaics, other shrines and sites are facing similar decisions. Mosaics have long held a special role in Christian art, and are particularly useful in outdoor settings where, by the nature of the mosaic craft, they provide bright colors but can still withstand sun, wind, rain, etc. Various shrines and sites around the world employed Rupnik's workshop, often for very large and prominent works.


Moderate Bishop Makes Stunning Declaration About the Papacy

Bishop Bravely Tells Leo That No One Wants Synodality


Bishop Rob Mutsaerts got a swift rebuke from his own bishop for telling a basic simple truth about Synodality.

Hidden Medieval Routes and Mysterious Pathways

From Modern History TV


Jason Kingsley, OBE, the Modern Knight, explores the hidden world of lesser-known medieval roads that shaped everyday life in the Middle Ages. Beyond the famous Roman roads and great royal highways, there existed a vast network of practical, often forgotten routes that kept medieval society moving. We look at drovers’ roads, the long-distance tracks used to move cattle, sheep, and pigs across the countryside to market. These routes were vital to medieval trade and survival, often stretching for hundreds of miles across rugged terrain. We also examine salt ways, the ancient trade routes used to transport one of the most valuable commodities of the medieval world: salt. Essential for preserving food, salt drove entire economies and shaped settlements along its routes. Finally, we uncover the eerie and often overlooked leper paths—routes associated with medieval leper houses and hospitals, designed to separate and manage disease within the landscape of fear and faith. These forgotten roads reveal how ordinary people actually moved, traded, and survived in medieval England and beyond. They also show a landscape far more connected—and far more structured—than we often assume. If you’re interested in medieval history, historical travel, forgotten infrastructure, or the daily lives of ordinary people in the Middle Ages, this video is for you. Medieval drovers’ roads and livestock movement Salt trade routes in medieval Europe Leper paths and medieval disease management Forgotten medieval infrastructure Everyday travel in the Middle Ages

Traditional Catholic Morning Prayers in English | August


Traditional Catholic morning prayers to help start your day in a godly way! The month of August is dedicated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. I hope these prayers increase your devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary this month and draw you closer to her Divine Son, Jesus Christ. Begin each day with morning prayer! This video is a compilation of many traditional evening prayers Catholics say, and should not be considered a replacement for those who have an obligation to pray the Divine Office evening prayers.

Can You Sin at Mass? 7 Things Most Catholics Get Wrong

From Totus Catholica


Can you sin at Mass? Not before it, not after it, during it. Most Catholics have never asked that out loud, because we assume the dangerous hour of the week happens somewhere else. The Church has never taught that Mass is a safe room where the ordinary rules of sin are suspended. She teaches the opposite. Some of the gravest sins a Catholic can commit happen inside the hour meant to be the safest. Here are seven of them, each with the exact document and paragraph, plus three things you were probably told are sins that are not. All seven trace back to one confusion. Most people experience Mass as a service they attend. The Church believes it is the sacrifice of Calvary made present, not repeated, made present, because the same Christ offered once in a bloody manner on the cross is offered here in an unbloody manner. The Hebrew word qodesh means holiness, something set apart from ordinary use because it belongs entirely to God, and bells were sewn onto the hem of the high priest's robe so their sound would be heard when he entered the holy place, so that he would not die. The Church did not invent reverence. She inherited it from Israel. So go to confession first and come to the altar clean, the way St. Pius X wanted you: not weekly, daily. In this video: • CCC 2120 and Canon 916: communion in mortal sin is sacrilege, and the perfect contrition exception • Skipping Sunday Mass (CCC 2181), the "notable part" rule on arriving late, and the one hour fast • What deacons did at the church doors around the year 380, and why St. Philip Neri sent candles into the street • GIRM 274, Chrysostom's angels around the altar, and the warning of Uzzah • Three things that are not sins: communion in the hand, an uncovered head, and receiving twice in one day ⏱ CHAPTERS 0:00 Can You Sin at Mass 3:16 Communion in a State of Mortal Sin 4:54 Is Skipping Sunday Mass a Grave Sin 5:25 Arriving Late and Leaving Early 7:37 The One Hour Eucharistic Fast 9:48 The Tabernacle Is Not Furniture 12:56 Three Things That Are Not Sins 📖 SCRIPTURE REFERENCED • 1 Corinthians 11:27-30: whoever eats or drinks in an unworthy manner profanes the body and blood of the Lord, which is why some grew sick and some died. • Matthew 5:23,24: if your brother has something against you, leave your gift at the altar and be reconciled first. • Habakkuk 2:20: the Lord is in his holy temple; let all the earth keep silence before him. • 2 Samuel 6 with Numbers: Uzzah struck down for steadying the ark with his bare hand, when touching the holy things had already been forbidden. • Exodus 28:35: bells sewn onto the hem of the high priest's robe so their sound is heard when he enters the holy place, so that he does not die. ⛪ FROM THE CHURCH FATHERS & THE CATECHISM • Didache (1st to 2nd century): confess your sins before the Sunday assembly, and let no one with a quarrel join until reconciled, so the sacrifice may be pure. • St. John Chrysostom, On the Priesthood 6: angels surround the priest, and the sanctuary is filled with the powers of heaven in honor of him who lies upon the altar. • CCC 1367: the sacrifice of Christ and the sacrifice of the Eucharist are one single sacrifice. • CCC 2120 and 2181: sacrilege against the Eucharist, and deliberately failing the Sunday obligation, are each called grave sin. 📜 SOURCES & FURTHER READING • Council of Trent, Session 13 (1551), chapter 7 and canon 11, with Canon 916: no one conscious of mortal sin approaches the Eucharist without confession first; the perfect contrition exception is narrower than most people use it. • St. Pius X, Sacra Tridentina (1905): frequent and daily communion open to all the faithful. • Apostolic Constitutions (c. 380), book 8: deacons at the doors so that no one went out at the time of the oblation, and others walked the aisles against tumult, whispering, and slumber. • The fast's history: Council of Hippo (393), Pius XII (1953 and 1957), Paul VI (November 1964) down to the single hour of Canon 919 (CCC 1387). • GIRM 45, 82, 160, and 274: sacred silence, the sign of peace placed before communion, the bow of the head, and genuflection before the Blessed Sacrament (CCC 1377: the presence endures as long as the species subsist). • Memoriale Domini (1969), Inter Insigniores (1976), Redemptionis Sacramentum 94, and Canons 917 and 921 🔗 EXPLORE MORE 🌍 Website: https://totuscatholica.org/ Rosary Guide: https://totuscatholica.org/rosary ✉️ Contact: https://totuscatholica.org/contact 🔍 Examination of Conscience: https://catholicexaminationofconscien... 📚 Free eBooks: https://buymeacoffee.com/totuscatholi... 👥 Become a Totus Insider: https://buymeacoffee.com/totuscatholi...

How Mary Became a Queen at the Annunciation

I am amazed at how upset fundamentalist protestants get when we call Mary a Queen. This article explains why the title is firmly rooted in Scripture.


From Aleteia

By Philip Kosloski

The Blessed Virgin Mary's queenship is directly linked to the moment she became the mother of the King of kings.

The Catholic Church honors Mary as the "Queen of Heaven and Earth," a royal title that can be surprising to other Christians. It could appear at first glance to give Mary undue honor, especially as a mere creature.

Yet, when viewed in light of Scripture and ancient Jewish tradition, it makes perfect sense that Mary can be called a queen.

Queenship bestowed at the Annunciation

The only reason why Catholics call Mary a queen is because of her relation to Jesus Christ, the King of kings. She was chosen to be his mother and so the moment she receive him into her womb, she was immediately raised to the status of "Queen Mother."

Pius XII explained this in his encyclical Ad Caeli Reginam (On the Queenship of Mary):

[I]t is easily concluded that she is a Queen, since she bore a son who, at the very moment of His conception, because of the hypostatic union of the human nature with the Word, was also as man King and Lord of all things. So with complete justice St. John Damascene could write: "When she became Mother of the Creator, she truly became Queen of every creature."

This is due in part to an ancient Jewish tradition of how the mother of the king would be crowned as queen.

According to theologian Colin B. Donovan, "In the Old Testament monarchy the Queen of the Davidic Kingdom was the Queen Mother. The Kings, for reasons of state and human weakness, had many wives, none of whom fittingly could be called Queen. That honor was reserved for the mother of the King, whose authority far surpassed the many 'queens' married to the king. We see this is the role Bathsheba played with respect to King Solomon and the occasions when the Queen Mother acted as regent on behalf of juvenile successors to the throne."

As Jesus is the "New David," Mary became the "Queen Mother," continuing a tradition that was familiar to the Jewish people.

Pius XII also mentions how this queenship is recognized by St. Gabriel, "it can be said that the heavenly voice of the Archangel Gabriel was the first to proclaim Mary's royal office."

This was due to the fact that St. Gabriel mentions Jesus' kingship in his address to Mary at the Annunciation, "He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there will be no end. ” (Luke 1:32-33).

As a result, the Catholic Church confidently asserts Mary is a queen, based on her profound relationship with Jesus, the King of the Universe. If Jesus is a king, then Mary, his mother, is a queen.

Vatican Said No to Lay Preaching in Germany. The German Bishops Are Moving Ahead Anyway.

From The Catholic Corner


On August 21, 2026, Germany's top bishop admitted the Synodal Path's most controversial questions were never actually resolved – just paused. That bishop is Heiner Wilmer, the new chairman of the German Bishops' Conference. In an interview with Kirche+Leben, Wilmer said plainly: "The issues haven't been resolved; they will continue to be addressed. They are part of the World Synod!" Germany's reform agenda didn't end – it just folded into the larger, global Synod on Synodality. In March, the German bishops formally asked Rome for permission to let trained laypeople preach the homily during Mass. Cardinal Arthur Roche rejected that request outright in a letter dated June 17. His reasoning: the priest's role in preaching is tied to the very nature of the liturgy itself. Wilmer respected the decision – but said Münster's pastoral workers would "find a good way to deal with the circumstances." That's a notably soft landing for a direct Vatican rejection. A proposed "Synodal Conference" – a permanent national body for bishops and laity – is still sitting in Rome awaiting approval. Formal Vatican rejection doesn't necessarily mean an issue is closed in Germany. It just means the conversation moves to Rome's own October meeting instead.

Introduction to the Fake Sister Lucy Hypothesis

Was the later Sister Lucy an impostor? I have no idea, but it would not surprise me, given the lengths to which Rome went to prevent the Third Secret from being revealed.


From One Peter Five

 By Kevin J. Symonds, MA

In January 2006, the notion of a world-wide imposture arose.

The year 2026 marks the twentieth anniversary of a very controversial notion: the woman known from 1967-2005 as Sr. Lúcia dos Santos, the last surviving seer of Fátima, was an impostor. This idea has roots going back into earlier decades but has taken on a very different face since January of 2006. I would like to go into this controversy and shed some light upon it.

The controversy has roots in events of October 1992. At that time, Anthony Cardinal Padiyara went to Coimbra to visit Sr. Lúcia at her convent. He asked Carlos Evaristo to serve as translator. Afterward, Evaristo recounted the conversation to Frère François de Marie des Anges and an unnamed friend of Frère François. The two gentlemen were baffled at some of the things Evaristo said. Frère François’ friend speculated that Evaristo could not prove the woman who spoke to Cardinal Padiyara was the real Lúcia.[1] The notion that this woman was not Lúcia was specific to the visit with Cardinal Padiyara.

Later, in January 2006, the notion of a world-wide imposture arose. At that time, Peter Dimond of Most Holy Family Monastery published an article entitled “The Whole Truth about the Consecration and Conversion of Russia and the impostor Sr. Lucy.”[2] This article was divided into a couple of sections, the second of which made the claim that there was an impostor Lúcia after 1960. Dimond raised various arguments in support of his assertion. It is enough to say that not a few of them were rooted in points of contention with the Church.

Following very shortly after the publication of Dimond’s article was the work of Dr. Marian Horvat of the organization Tradition in Action (TIA). Together with her co-worker Atila Sinka Guimarães, they inaugurated a more concerted effort than Peter Dimond, though evidence suggests that Horvat and Guimarães acted independently of Dimond.[3] Their work began between March and April of 2006 when a photo in the publication Inside the Vatican (ITV) was misattributed to portray Sr. Lúcia.[4] The error was later corrected in a subsequent edition of ITV (April, 2006).[5]

Despite the correction, Horvat embarked upon an effort to demonstrate that images pre-1967 and post-1967 Lúcia were not the same woman. The former person was labeled “Lucy I” (the “real” Lúcia) and the latter “Lucy II” (the alleged impostor) within TIA literature. Photos were gathered, labeled, and various observations made that highlighted or accentuated differences between the person in the different sets of photos.[6] Arguments went back and forth in 2006 and into subsequent years for or against Horvat’s assertion. Overall, the notion of an impostor Lúcia remained essentially a Catholic conspiracy issue on the margins, away from the “mainstream.” That is undoubtedly why many may only be aware of the issue through this essay.

In 2017, Dr. Peter Chojnowski decided to take up the mantle of what we can call the “Fake Lúcia Hypothesis” (FLH). Chojnowski had been involved with the organization “The Fatima Center.”[7] He was familiar with a lot of the discussions on Fátima put forth by the Center. By 2017, the FLH had come to Chojnowski’s attention and one of the Center’s other associates, Cornelia Ferreira, helped inspire Chojnowski to look into the matter.[8]

From that initial inspiration (and others), Chojnowski established his own organization entitled “Sister Lucy Truth” (SLT) in late 2017/early 2018.[9] SLT desired to answer the question once and for all whether “Lucy II” is “Lucy I.” Knowing this question would never be answered definitively through eyeballing photos, Chojnowski solicited donations from the general public to hire forensic experts. They would look at the evidence and render their judgments according to a self-described “scientific way.”

The work of finding, hiring and publishing the findings (“reports”) of the experts went from 2018 to 2022. Over the course of those four or so years, SLT published a range of material touching upon different areas such as maxillofacial structures, handwriting analyses, forensic artistry, and mathematical proportionality. The list was quite impressive to the average person, but more so the conclusions reached by the authors of the various reports. Not a few of them claimed that “Lucy II” was noticeably different than “Lucy I,” such that they found it hard to believe the person in the photos/videos were truly the same person.

SLT has created its own body of literature based largely upon the reports of its hired experts. Among this literature are videos on YouTube by the SLT associate Winn Young that translate the written reports into visual terms.[10] Doing so makes it easier for the average person to understand some of the otherwise detailed reports. Today, SLT has largely rested its laurels upon the credibility and expertise of said experts. It has, so to speak, thrown down the gauntlet before the Church and the world and made grave accusations against various ecclesiastical persons (even popes).

Arguably, Sister Lucy Truth has far surpassed its predecessors on the matter of the Fake Lúcia Hypothesis. As such, we will, in the next article, begin to dive into some of the organization’s materials, critique them, and ask some notable questions.


Editor’s note: at the time of publication, Dr. Chojnowski’s blog RadTrad Thomist is no longer accessible. However, these pages are accessible through the Wayback Machine.

[1] Frère François de Marie des Anges. “Incredible Expedient Of An Antifatimist Hierarchy At Bay A False Lucy Substituted For The True?.” The Fatima Crusader (Spring, 1993): 36ff.

[2] Peter Dimond. “The Whole Truth about the Consecration and Conversion of Russia and the impostor Sr. Lucy.” Most Holy Family Monastery (January, 2006).

[3] Cf. TIA Correspondence Desk. “The Controversy Grows…” Tradition in Action (April 21, 2006).

[4] Dr. Marian T. Horvat. “Two Sister Lucys of Fatima?.” Tradition in Action (April 5, 2006).

[5] Atila Sinko Guimarães (edit.). “You Are Conspiracy Maniacs.” Tradition in Action (April 14, 2006).

[6] Dr. Marian T. Horvat. “The Two Sister Lucys: Photos and Facts.” Tradition in Action (April 27, 2006).

[7] An organization founded by Fr. Nicholas Gruner in order to promote his understanding of the message of Fátima.

[8] Dr. Peter Chojnowski. “Tradition in Action’s Dr. Marian Horvat Acknowledges.” RadTrad Thomist (June 20, 2023).

[9] Dr. Peter Chojnowski. “It Begins: Sister Lucy Truth Incorporated is established.” RadTrad Thomist (November 17, 2017).

[10] Cf. Sister Lucy Truth YouTube Channel. See also Winn Young’s YouTube Channel.

Divine Liturgy for the Thirteenth Sunday After Holy Pentecost

Today's Divine Liturgy from the UGCC Church in Australia. You may follow the Liturgy here.

Thirteenth Sunday After Pentecost

Today's Holy Mass from SSPX Australia. You may follow the Mass at Divinum Officium.

Thirteenth Sunday after Pentecost ~ Dom Prosper Guéranger

St Philip Benizi, Confessor ~ Dom Prosper Guéranger

Thirteenth Sunday After Pentecost


From Dom Prosper Guéranger's Liturgical Year:

The dominical series—which, formerly, counted from the feast of Saint Peter, or of the Apostles—never went beyond this Sunday. The feast of Saint Laurence gave its name to those which follow; through that name began with even the ninth Sunday, for the years when Easter was nearest the Spring equinox. When, on the contrary, that Solemnity was kept at its almost latest date, the weeks began from today be counted as the Weeks of the seventh month (September).

The Ember-Days of the Autumn quarter sometimes occur even this week, while, other years, they may be as late as the eighteenth. We will speak of them, when we come to the seventeenth Sunday, for it is in the week following that, that the Roman Missal inserts them.

In the Western Church, the thirteenth Sunday takes its name from the Gospel of the ten lepers, which is read in the Mass: the Greeks, who count it as the thirteenth of Saint Matthew, read on it the parable of the vineyard, whose laborers, though called at different hours of the day, all receive the same pay. (Matthew 20)

Mass.—Now that she is in possession of the promises so long waited for by the world, —the Church loves to repeat the words wherewith the just men of the old law used to express their sentiments. Those just men were living during the gloomy period, when the human race was seated in the shadow of death. We are under incomparably happier circumstances; we are blessed with graces in abundance; Eternal Wisdom has spared us the trials our forefathers had to contend with, by giving us to live in the period which has been enriched by all the mysteries of salvation being fulfilled. There is a danger, however, and our Mother the Church does her utmost to avert us from falling into it; it is the danger of forgetting all these blessings of ours. Ingratitude is the necessary outcome of forgetfulness, and today’s Gospel justly condemns it. On this account, the Epistle, and here our Introit, remind us of the time when man had nothing to cheer him but hope: a promise had indeed been made to him, of a sublime covenant which was, at some distant future, to be realized; but meanwhile he was very poor, was a prey to the wiles of Satan, is cause was to be tried by divine justice, and yet he prayed for loving mercy.

INTROIT

Have regard to thy covenant, O Lord, and abandon not the souls of the poor to the end. Arise, O Lord, and judge thine own cause; and forget not the cries of them that seek thee.

Ps. Why, O God, hast thou cast us off, unto the end? why is thy wrath kindled against the sheep of thy pasture? Glory, etc. Have regard.

This day last week, we were considering how important are Faith and Charity to a Christian who is living under the Law of grace. There is another virtue of equal necessity: it is Hope; for although he already have the substantial possession of the good things which will constitute his future happiness, the gloom of the land of exile, where the Christian is at present living, prevents him from seeing them. Moreover, this mortal life being essentially a period of trial, wherein each one is to win his crown, (1 Corinthians 9:25) the struggle makes even the very best feel, and that right to the end, the weight of incertitude and anguish. Let us therefore pray with the Church in her Collect, for an increase of the three fundamental virtues of Faith, Hope, and Charity; and that way may deserve to reach the perfection of the good which is promised to us in heaven, let us sue for the grace of devotedness to the commandments of God; they lead us to our eternal home. Let us remember how the Gospel of Sunday last included them all in Love.

COLLECT

O almighty and eternal God, grant unto us an increase of faith, hope, and charity: and, that we may deserve what thou promisest, make us to love what thou commandest. Through, etc.

The other Collects, as in the Fourth Sunday after Pentecost.

EPISTLE

Lesson of the Epistle of St. Paul, the Apostle, to the Galatians 3:16-22

Brethren: to Abraham were the promises made and to his seed. He saith not, And to his seeds, as of many: but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. Now this I say, that the testament which was confirmed by God, the law which was made after four hundred and thirty years, doth not disannul, to make the promise of no effect. For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise. But God gave it to Abraham by promise. Why then was the law? It was set because of transgressions, until the seed should come, to whom he made the promise, being ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator. Now a mediator is not of one: but God is one. Because of transgressions: To restrain them from sin, by fear and threats. Ordained by angels: The law was delivered by angels, speaking in the name and person of God to Moses, who was the mediator, on this occasion, between God and the people. Was the law then against the promises of God? God forbid. For if there had been a law given which could give life, verily justice should have been by the law. But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise, by the faith of Jesus Christ, might be given to them that believe.

Look up to heaven, and number the stars, if thou canst! So shall thy seed be! (Genesis 15:5) Abraham was almost a hundred years old, (Romans 4:19) and Sara’s barrenness deprived him of all-natural hope of posterity, when these words were spoken to him by God. Abraham, nevertheless, believed God, says the scripture, and it was reputed to him unto justice. (Genesis 15:5-6) And when later on that same faith would have led him to sacrifice, on the mount, that son of the promise, his one only hope, God renewed his promise and added: In thy seed, shall all the nations of the earth be blessed. (Hebrews 11:17-19)

It is now that the promise is fulfilled; the event justifies Abraham’s faith. He believed against all hope, trusting to that God who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things that are not, as those that are; (Romans 4:17-18) and according to the expression of John the Baptist, from the very stones of the Gentile world, there rise up, in all places, children to Abraham. (Matthew 3:9)

His faith, firm and at the same time so simple, gave to God the glory (Romans 4:20) which he looks for from his creatures. Man can add nothing to the divine perfections; but—agreeably to God’s own words—though he sees them not directly here below, he acknowledges those perfections by adoring and loving them; he makes his faith tell upon his whole life; and this use which he freely makes of his faculties—this voluntary devotedness of an intelligent being—magnifies God by adding to his extrinsic glory.

Following in Abraham’s steps, (Romans 4:12) there have come those multitudes born for that heaven of faith, which he showed to the whole earth. They live by faith; (Romans 1:17) and thereby in all their acts, they give to God the homage of confession and praise, through his Son Christ Jesus; and like Abraham, they receive in return a blessing, a benediction, of an ever-increasing justice. (Romans 4:23-24) The magnificent development of the Church, which gives this new posterity to Abraham, is greater and more visible since the fall of Israel. In countries the remotest, in the midst of cities that once were all pagan, we see crowds of men, women and children imitating Abraham, (Genesis 12:1) that is, at heaven’s call, leaving, if not their country, at least everything that once made earth dear to them; and like him, trusting in the fidelity and power of God to fulfill his promises, (Romans 4:20-21) they lived as strangers amidst their neighbors, yea, and in their very homes, using this world as though they did not use it. In the tumult of cities as in the desert, in the midst of the vain pleasures of the world, whose fashion and figure passeth away (1 Corinthians 7:31) —they have no other thought that that of the unseen realities, (Hebrews 11:1) no other care than that of pleasing God. (1 Corinthians 7:32) They take to themselves the word that was spoken to their father: Walk before me, and be perfect! (Genesis 17:1) and in truth, it was to all of them that it was spoken; it was the condition in the alliance, concluded by God with those his faithful servants of all ages, in the person of the grand Patriarch, who was not only their progenitur, but their model too; and God responds also to their faith, either by private manifestations or by the still surer voice of his Scriptures, (2 Peter 1:19) saying: Fear not! I am thy protector, and thy reward exceeding great! (Genesis 15:1)

Truly, then, the benediction of Abraham has been poured forth on the Gentiles. (Galatians 3:14) Christ Jesus, the true Son of the promise, the only seed of salvation has, by faith in his Resurrection (Romans 4:24) assembled from every nation (Galatians 3:28) them that are of a good will, (Luke 2:14) making them all one in him, making them, like himself, children of Abraham, (Galatians 3:29) and what is better still, children of God. (Galatians 4:5-7) The benediction that was promised at the beginning of the alliance, was the Holy Ghost himself, (Galatians 3:14) the spirit of adoption of children that came down into our hearts, to make us all heirs of God and joint heirs of Christ. (Romans 8:15-17) O mighty power of Faith, which breaks down the former walls of division, unites nations together, (Ephesians 2:14-18) and substitutes the love and freedom of children of the Most High for the law of bondage and fear. (Romans 8:2)

And yet, grand as was this spectacle of the Gentiles becoming incorporated into the chosen race, and being made sharers, in Christ, of the holy promises (Ephesians 3:6) —it did not please all people. The carnal Jew, who boasts of having Abraham for his father, though he cares little about imitating his works (John 8:39)—the Circumcised who vaunts the bearing in his flesh the sign of a Faith which dwells not in his heart (Romans 4:11)—these men who have rejected Christ now reject his members and would fain destroy his Church, or at least trammel it. They are enraged at seeing crowding in, from every portion of the globe, (Luke 13:29) that immense concourse, which their vile jealousy has vainly sought to keep back. While their wounded pride kept them from going in, (Luke 15:28) the Gentiles were sitting down with Abraham, IsaacJacob, and all the Prophets, at the banquet of God’s kingdom; (Luke 13:28) the last became the first. (Luke 13:30) Even to the end of time, Israel—who, by his own obstinacy, has forfeited his ancient glory—will continue to be the enemy of this spiritual posterity of Abraham, which has supplanted him; (Genesis 27:36) but his persecutions against the children of the promise and of the lawful Bride, will but result in showing that he is, as St. Paul says, the son of Agar, the son of the bond-woman, who, together with her child, is excluded from the inheritance and the kingdom. (Galatians 4:22-31)

He prefers to refuse the liberty offered him by the Lord, rather than acknowledge the definitive abrogation of his now dead Law: be it so; his hatred will not induce the children of the Church (who are prefigured by Sara, the free-woman) to reject the grace of their God for the sake of pleasing their enemy; it will not induce them to abandon the justice of Faith and the riches of the Spirit and the life in Christ, in order to go back again to the yoke of slavery (Galatians 5:1) which, let the Jew do what he will, was broken into pieces by the Cross he himself set up on Calvary. (Galatians 2:19-21) Up to the last, the true Jerusalem, the free city, our mother—she that was once the barren woman but now is so glad a Bride with her children around her—yes, she will meet the superannuated, yet ever busy, pretensions of the Synagogue, by reading to her assembled sons and daughters the Epistle we are having today. Up to the last, St. Paul, in her name—speaking of the law of Sinai, which was made known to its subjects, through the mediation of Moses and the Angels—will prove its inferiority as compared to the covenant made by Abraham directly with God; each year, as emphatically as on the day he wrote his Epistle, Paul will declare the transient character of that legislation, which came four hundred and thirty years after a promise which could not be changed; neither was such legislation to continue, when the time should come for that Son of Abraham to appear, from whom the world was waiting to received the promised benediction.

But what is to be said of the incapability of the mosaic ministration to give man strength and enable him to rise up from his fall? The Gospel on which we were meditating eight days back, (Luke 10:22-37) and which, formerly, was assigned to this present Sunday, gave a symbolical and striking commentary on the uselessness of the Old Law in regard to this; at the same time, it showed us the remedial power which resided in Christ, and was by Him transmitted to the ministers of the New Law. “Every portion of the Office of the thirteenth Sunday,” says Abbot Rupert, “bears on the history of that Samaritan, whose name signifies keeper; it is our Lord Jesus Christ who, by his Incarnation, comes to the rescue of the man whom the Old Law was not able to keep from harm; and when this Jesus leaves the world, he consigns the poor sufferer to the care of the Apostles, and apostolic men, in the house of the Church. The intentional selection of this Gospel for today throws a great light on our Epistle, as also on the whole Letter to the Galatians, from which it is taken. Thus, the Priest and the Levite of the Parable are a figure of the Law, and their passing by the half-dead man, seeing him indeed, but without making an attempt to heal him—is expressive of what that Law did. True, it did not go counter to God’s promises; but of itself, it could justify no man. A physician, who does not himself intend to visit a patient will, sometimes, send a servant who is expert in the knowledge of the causes of the malady, yet who has not the skill needed for mixing the remedy required but can merely tell the sick man what diet and what drinks he must avoid, if he would prevent his ailment from causing death. Such was the Law, set, as the Epistle tells us, because of transgressions, as a simple safeguard, until such time as there should come the Good Samaritan, the heavenly Physician. Having from his very first coming into this world fallen among robbers, Man is stripped of his supernatural goods, and is covered with the wounds inflicted on him by original sin; if he do not abstain from actual sins, from those transgressions against which the Law was set as a monitor, he runs the risk of dying altogether.” (Rupert, The Divine Office 12:13)

It is on this account that the Gradual repeats the supplication of the Introit; Respice, Domine, in testamentum tuum; for as Rupert observes, it was the cry of the ancient people who, sighing at the weakness of the powerless Law of Sinai, besought God to fulfill the covenant he had promised to Abraham’s faith. They cried out to Christ, as the poor creature might have done to the Good Samaritan, after he saw the priest and the Levite pass him by, without an effort made to save him.

GRADUAL

Look down, O Lord, upon thy covenant; and forget not forever the souls of thy poor.

℣. Arise, O Lord, and judge thine own cause: remember how thy servants are upbraided.

Alleluia, alleluia.

℣. Thou, O Lord, art our refuge, from generation to generation.

GOSPEL

Sequel of the holy Gospel according to Luke 17:11-19

At that time: as Jesus was going to Jerusalem, he passed through the midst of Samaria and Galilee. And as he entered into a certain town, there met him ten men that were lepers, who stood afar off; And lifted up their voice, saying: Jesus, master, have mercy on us. Whom when he saw, he said: Go, shew yourselves to the priests. And it came to pass, as they went, they were made clean. And one of them, when he saw that he was made clean, went back, with a loud voice glorifying God. And he fell on his face before his feet, giving thanks: and this was a Samaritan. And Jesus answering, said, Were not ten made clean? and where are the nine? There is no one found to return and give glory to God, but this stranger. And he said to him: Arise, go thy way; for thy faith hath made thee whole.

The Samaritan Leper, cured of that hideous malady which is an apt figure of sin, in company with nine lepers of Jewish nationality, represents the despised race of Gentiles, who were at first admitted, by stealth, so to say, and by extraordinary privilege, into a share of the graces belonging to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. (Matthew 15:24) The conduct of these ten men, on occasion of their miraculous cure, is in keeping with the attitude assumed by the two people they typify, regarding the salvation offered to the world by the Son of God. It is a fresh demonstration of what the Apostle says: All are not Israelites that are of Israel; neither are all they who are the seed of Abraham, children; “but,” says the Scripture, “in Isaac shall thy seed be called,” (Genesis 21:12) that is to say, not they who are the children of the flesh, are the children of God: but they that are the children of the promises are counted for the seed; they are born of the faith of Abraham and are, in the eyes of the Lord, his true progeny. (Romans 9:8)

Our holy Mother the Church is never tired of this subject, the comparison of the Two Testaments, and the contrast here is between the two people. We deem it our duty, before proceeding further, to explain how this is, for there are many persons who cannot understand what benefit can come to us Christians from hearing this subject preached to us. The kind of spirituality which, with many of us, has nowadays been substituted for the liturgical life so thoroughly lived in, and so precious to our Catholic ancestors, gives a certain disrelish for the ideas which the Church so perseveringly brings before them during so many of her Sundays. They have become habituated to live in an atmosphere of very limited truth; it is all subjective, as well as little; and they consider it a very excellent thing to forget all other teaching, except what they happen to possess, and beyond which it is a trouble to go. With Christians of this class, it is not surprising that they feel puzzled at finding the Church continually urging them to take an interest in a long past, which they call of no practical utility to them! But the interior life, truly worthy of the name, is not what these good people imagine. No school of spirituality, either now or ever, made the ideal of virtue consist in indifference for those great historic facts which are evidently so precious in the eyes of the Church and of God himself. And what is the usual result of this isolating themselves from their Mother’s most cherished appreciations? It is that by this determined shutting themselves up in their own private prayers, they, by a just punishment, lose sight of the true end of prayer, which is union with and love of God. Their meditation is deprived of that element of intimate and fruitful converse with God, which is assigned it by all the masters of the spiritual life; it soon becomes an unproductive exercise of analysis and reasoning, in which there is nothing but abstract conclusions.

Now, when God mercifully invited men to the divine nuptials by manifesting to them his Word, it was not by abstraction that he gave to our earth this the Son of his own eternal Substance. As to his divinity, men could not, in their present state, see it in a direct way. Had then God shown us, in this pretended abstract way, that eternal Son of his, in whom are found all beauty and warmth and life—it would have been imperfect and cold. This he did not do; but as St. Paul tells us, he manifested, he shewed, the great mystery of godliness in the Flesh; (1 Timothy 3:16) the Word became a living soul; (Genesis 2:7) eternal Truth assumed to himself a Body, that so he might converse with men; (Baruch 3:38) and grow up like one of themselves. (Luke 2:52) And when that Body, which eternal Truth was to hold as his own forever, was taken up in glory, (1 Timothy 3:16)—the Church, the Bride of this Man-God, the bone of his bones, and flesh of his flesh, (Ephesians 5:30-32) continued in the world this manifestation of God, by the member of Christ; she continued that historic development (Ephesians 1:23) of the Word, which is only to cease when time is no more. This manifestation, this development, surpasses all human calculations and reveals fresh aspects of the Wisdom of God even to the Angels themselves. (Ephesians 3:10) Undoubtedly, a real regard is to be had for those axioms to which great minds have reduced the principles of science in an abstract logical order, quite independently of history and facts: but neither with God nor with man has this sort of petrified theorizing anything in it of the life, the influence, the activity of substantial truth. In the Church, as in God, truth is life and light; (John 1:4) her grand Credo would never ring so triumphantly as it does through our churches, it would never make its way so irresistibly up to heaven, if it were but a bare series of true definitions and phrases: its superhuman power comes from each of its articles, almost each of its words, teeming with the blood of martyrs upon it, and radiant, for the Church and for God, with the splendor of toils and sufferings and combats of thousands of sainted Confessors and Doctors, the very aristocracy, that is, of human nature ennobled by Baptism, whose living is to be the completing the Body of Christ here below. (Colossians 1:24, 2:19)

The subject is too full to be treated of here; but this much is irresistible—that after the master-fact of the Incarnation of the Word, who came upon our earth to manifest God, through the ages of time, by Christ and his members, (2 Corinthians 4:10-11) there is not one which is more important, not one which has been and still is so dear to God, as the vocation of the two people that were successively called by Him to the blessing of an alliance with him. The gifts and vocations of God are, as the Apostle expresses it without repentance, or regret, on his part. Those Jews, who are now his enemies because they reject the Gospel, are still called charissimi, they are still the beloved and dearly beloved, because of their Fathers. (Romans 11:28-29) For the same reason, a time will come and the whole world is waiting for it, when the denial of Juda being revoked and his iniquities blotted out, the promises made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, will be literally fulfilled. (Romans 11:25-27) The divine unity of the two Testaments will be made evident; and the two peoples themselves will be made one under their one head Christ Jesus. (Romans 2:14) The covenant of God with man being then fully realized, such as he had designed it in his eternal wisdom—the earth having yielded its fruit (Psalm 66:7) —the world having done its work—the sepulchers will give back their dead, (Romans 11:15) and History cease here on earth, leaving glorified human nature to bloom in unreserved fullness of life, under God’s complacent eye.

The truths, then, which are again brought before our notice by today’s Gospel, are anything but dry or old-fashioned; nothing is so grand; and we must add, though superficial minds will wonder at it—there is nothing more practical in this season of the year, for it is the season that is consecrated to the mysteries of the Unitive Life. After all, in what, primarily, does union between God and man consist, but in unanimity of the divine and human minds? Now, we know that the divine mind has manifested all its designs in the respective history of the two Testaments and the two Peoples; and that the final result, which is to bring these two histories to their close, is the one only end which infinite Love was in the beginning and it now, and will forever be, proposing to fulfill. The Church, therefore, far from showing herself to be not up to the present age by recurring continually to truths such as these, is but clearly proving herself to be the most intelligent Bride of Jesus—is but evincing the changeless lovely youthfulness of a heart which ever beats in unison with that of her Spouse.

Let us now resume the literal explanation of our Gospel. As we were observing on a previous Sunday, our Jesus here again wishes rather to give us a useful teaching than to manifest his divine power. It is for this purpose that he does not cure these ten lepers who besought him to have mercy on them, as on another occasion he cured one who was suffering from the same misery. To this latter, who besought Him, he restored cleanliness by a few words: this was at the beginning of his public life; he said: “Be thou made clean!” and forthwith the leprosy was cleansed. (Matthew 8:3) But the lepers of our Gospel is an event that took place in the latter portion of our Lord’s sojourn amongst men: and they are made clean only while on their way to show themselves to the priests; Jesus sends them to the priests, just as he had done in the previous case; and thus from the beginning to the close of his mortal life, he gives an example of the respect which was to be paid to the Old Law, so long as it was not abrogated. That Law gave to the sons of Aaron the power not of curing, but of discerning leprosy, and passing judgment on its being cured or not. (Leviticus 13)

The time, however, is now come for a Law that is to be far above that of Sinai; and it has a priesthood, whose judgments are not to be concerning the state of the body, but by pronouncing the sentence of absolution, is to effectually remove the leprosy of souls. The cure which the ten lepers felt coming upon them before they had reached the priests ought to have sufficed to show them, in Jesus, the power of the new priesthood, which had been foretold by the Prophets; (Isaiah 66:21-23) the power which, by thus forestalling it in their favor, surpasses the authority of the ancient ministration is, or should be, evidence enough of the superior dignity of Him who exercises it. If only they were in suitable dispositions for the sacred rites, which are going to be used in the ceremony of their purification (Leviticus 14:1-15) —the Holy Ghost, who heretofore had inspired the prophetic details of the mysterious function about to be celebrated, would enable them to understand the signification of the expiatory sparrow, whose blood, being sprinkled upon the living water, sets free, by the wood, its fellow sparrow. The first bird typifies our Lord Jesus Christ, who likens himself, in the psalm, to the lonely sparrow; (Psalm 101:8) his immolation on the Cross, which gives to water the power of cleansing souls, communicates to the other sparrows, his Brethren, (Psalm 83:4) the purity of the Blood divine.

But the Jew is far from being ready for understanding these great mysteries. And yet the Law had been given to him, that it might serve as a hand leading him to Christ, and without exposing him to err. (Galatians 3:24) It was a signal favor, granted him, not from any merits of his own, but because of his Fathers. (Deuteronomy 4:37, 9:4-6) The favor was all the more precious, inasmuch as it was bestowed at a time when the tradition regarding a future Redeemer was almost entirely lost by the bulk of mankind. Gratitude should have been uppermost in the heart of Juda; but pride took its place. He was so taken up with the honor that had been put on him, that it made him lose all desire for the Messiah. He cannot endure the thought that a time will come when the Sun of Justice having risen for the whole earth, the limited advantage which was given to a few during the hours of night, shall be eclipsed by the bright noon of a light which all vie to enjoy. He therefore proclaims that the Old Law is definitive, though the Law protests itself to be but transitory; he therefore insists on the perpetuity of the reign of types and shadows. He lays it down as a dogma that no divine intervention can ever equal that made on Sinai; that every future prophet, every Sent of God, must be inferior to Moses; that all possible salvation is in the Law, and that from it alone flows every grace.

This explains to us how it was that of the ten men cured of the leprosy by Jesus, nine of them are found who have not even the remotest thought of coming to their Deliverer to thank him: these nine are Jews; Jesus, to their minds, is a mere disciple of Moses, a bare instrument of favors holding his commission from Sinai; and as soon as they have gone through the legal formality of their purification, they take it that all their obligations to God are paid. The Samaritan, the despises gentile whose sufferings have given him that humility which makes the sinner clear-sighted—he is the only one who recognizes God by his divine works and gives him thanks for his favors. How many ages of apparent abandonment, of humiliation and suffering, must pass over Juda too, before he will recognize and adore his God, and confess to him his sins, and give him his devoted love and, like this stranger, hear Jesus pronounce his pardon, and say: Arise! Go thy way! thy faith hath made thee whole and saved thee!

Let us, by our fervent prayers, hasten the time which will be so glorious for the two peoples when, united in the same faith by the consciousness of the same hopes then realized, they will cry out to our Redeemer the words of our Offertory:

OFFERTORY

In thee, O Lord, have I put my trust: thou art my God; my times are in thy hands.

It is the oblation that is now on the Altar, that is to obtain for us from God the pardon of our past offenses, and the graces we hope for, for the time to come. Let us, in the Secret, beseech him to accept, for the Sacrifice, these gifts which the Church, in the name of us all, has presented to him.

SECRET

Be thou propitious, O Lord, to thy people, and mercifully receive their offerings; that being appeased thereby, thou mayest grant us pardon, and bestow upon us what we ask. Through, etc.

The other Secrets, as in the Fourth Sunday After Pentecost.

Oh! when will the children of Juda come and experience for themselves the superiority of the Bread of the New Testament over the Manna of the Old? We Gentiles, the last-comers, but who have preceded our elder brethren at the banquet of love—let us sing all the more fervently, in our Communion-Anthem, the divine sweetness of this true Bread of heaven.

COMMUNION

Thou hast given us bread from heaven, O Lord, containing whatsoever is delicious and sweet.

As the Postcommunion expresses it, the work of our redemption by Jesus our Lord, is confirmed and grows within us, as often as we assist at these sacred Mysteries. The Church prays that her children may be blessed with the grace of this fruitful frequency, wherewith we are present at these Mysteries of salvation.

POSTCOMMUNION

May these heavenly mysteries, O Lord, which we have received, advance our eternal redemption. Through, etc.

The other Postcommunion, as in the Fourth Sunday after Pentecost.

VESPERS

The psalms, capitulum, hymn, and versicle, as above.

ANTIPHON OF THE MAGNIFICAT

But one of them, when he saw that he was made clean went back, glorifying God with a loud voice. Alleluia.

LET US PRAY

O almighty and eternal God, grant unto us an increase of faith, hope, and charity; and, that we may deserve what thou promisest, make us to love what thou commandest. Through, etc.