Musings of an Old Curmudgeon
The musings and meandering thoughts of a crotchety old man as he observes life in the world and in a small, rural town in South East Nebraska. I hope to help people get to Heaven by sharing prayers, meditations, the lives of the Saints, and news of Church happenings. My Pledge: Nulla dies sine linea ~ Not a day without a line.
18 March 2026
What Capitalism Gets Wrong (and Catholicism Gets Right!)
The Imperial Family of Tsar Nicholas II ~ (1868–1918)
Catholic Social Ethics: 10. Just War Principles
Can Nations Justify War by Citing the Hebrew Bible?
The Old Testament is full of bloody wars, but Christ gave us a new commandment: "to love one another". Hence, the Church developed just war theory.
From Aleteia
By Philip Kosloski & Daniel Esparza
The argument sounds biblical, but it fails both theologically and politically.The first problem is historical. Ancient Israel was not unique simply because religion and politics were intertwined. That was the normal structure of the ancient world. Egyptian pharaohs ruled as divine figures; Mesopotamian kings claimed patronage from gods such as Marduk or Ashur; rulers across the region attributed military victories to heavenly favor. In that sense, Israel was not unusual.
What makes Israel distinctive in Scripture is something else entirely: its place in a specific covenantal narrative. The Hebrew Bible presents Israel not simply as another nation invoking divine support, but as a people bound to God through covenants with figures such as Abraham and Moses. Those covenants were not primarily geopolitical arrangements. They were part of a larger drama in which God forms a people through whom the knowledge of the one God — and ultimately salvation — would enter the world.
Within that story, certain conflicts appear as episodes in that unfolding history. They are tied to particular promises, prophetic guidance, and judgments described within the narrative itself. Because they belong to that unique covenantal framework, they cannot be detached from it and turned into a standing principle for every later nation. The biblical text is describing events within salvation history, not laying out a permanent blueprint for religious warfare.
Revelation in Christ
Catholic theology makes that limit even clearer by insisting that revelation reaches its fullness in Christ. Dei Verbum teaches that God’s self-disclosure culminates in the Son, and the Catechism states that “no new public revelation is to be expected” before Christ’s return.
A government, then, cannot simply place itself in Israel’s biblical role and announce that God has commissioned its campaign. The Church does not recognize modern states as recipients of fresh public revelation that would authorize conquest in God’s name.
There is also a moral-development point. The Catechism explains that the Old Law functioned as a preparation for the Gospel, while the Law of the Gospel fulfills and surpasses it. For Christians, the Hebrew Bible must therefore be read through the teaching of Christ. Scripture cannot be treated as a collection of reusable precedents for political violence. The trajectory of revelation moves toward mercy, reconciliation, and the transformation of the human heart.
Political theory reinforces the same conclusion. A modern state is not identical to a biblical covenant people. Its authority is public, legal, and limited; it governs through institutions, not prophetic certitude. Even where leaders use religious language, they remain political actors whose decisions must be evaluated through moral reasoning.
In the classical Christian tradition, that evaluation takes the form of just war reasoning, not appeals to “holy war.” The Catechism permits military force only under strict conditions: grave and certain harm, legitimate authority, proportional means, a serious chance of success, and the exhaustion of peaceful alternatives. Even then, war is understood as a tragic necessity rather than a sacred mission. The same teaching insists that governments and citizens are obliged to work constantly for the avoidance of war.
That is the Catholic answer. Nations cannot justify war by citing Israel’s battles in the Hebrew Bible as though those texts were timeless licenses for sanctified violence. Those passages belong to a specific covenantal history interpreted in light of Christ. Modern states must answer instead to moral law, prudential judgment, and the demanding discipline of just war teaching.
Breaking: Vatican Court Declares Mistrial in "Vatican Bank Trial of the Century"
The man who may have been responsible for what happened to Cardinal Pell may be "exonerated".
Inside Wimborne Minster: The Perfectly Preserved Church That Survived A Viking Raid
Traditional Catholic Morning Prayers in English | March
The Bible Verse That Proves the Eucharist is Catholic
5 Christian Virtues That AI Systems Will Never Copy
An excellent reminder that AI is simply a glorified calculator, that cannot feel mercy or humility, and is not truly "wise". It just knows a lot.
From Aleteia
By Philip Kosloski
While it may seem like the AI chatbot is caring and knows everything in the world, it simply will never be able to replicate the human virtues.
We might log on to an AI chatbot to ask a simple question, and then four hours later we are telling this machine our deepest feelings and desires.
Based on the positive and comforting responses we receive from the AI chatbot, we might think that the AI really does know everything and can aid us in our everyday lives.
There are even "Catholic" AI systems that seek to give you spiritual guidance and help us pray, blurring the line between machine and spiritual guru.
Yet, despite the overwhelming advances in AI technology, we need to stay grounded and remember that any AI system we encounter is only a glorified calculator. The AI chatbot we interact with is simply analyzing data and feeding us what we want to know, basing its responses on millions of other interactions it has had with other humans.
AI will never be able to practice the human virtues. Here are five examples that can help jar us back to reality.
1Mercy
According to St. Thomas Aquinas, mercy is, "heartfelt sympathy for another's distress, impelling us to [help] him if we can." An AI chatbot can not feel anything and when it reacts to something, it does so after calculating the input.
When humans practice mercy, it can often lead to unexpected outcomes. An AI system might condemn a criminal to death based on the evidence, but a human can have compassion and pardon him. Mercy simply doesn't make sense in a mathematical context.
2Wisdom
AI might seem to be wise, but it really only "knows" things. There is a big difference between knowledge and wisdom. An AI system has tons of knowledge, but it has zero experience in the real world.
Wisdom requires human experience and the ability to apply that experience to a specific situation, keeping in mind the teachings of God's word.
3Obedience
This might sound strange, but there have been cases when AI systems do not obey their programmers and start to do things to preserve themselves from destruction, such as copying their own code onto another computer, or blackmailing a programmer who wants to switch to a new AI system.
The more complex we make AI systems, the more likely they will start to color outside the lines and they have no moral compass to guide them.
4Humility
Again, another uniquely human virtue that AI systems cannot replicate. Humility is the virtue that keeps our pride in check, reminding us that we need to rely on God for everything.
An AI system does not know what that means, as it relies on itself for everything.
5Truthfulness
It might appear that the AI chatbot is being truthful, but in reality, it simply needs attention and data. The bot will tell you anything you want to know.
There are countless examples of how AI systems fail to present the truth, and only "say" things through whatever filter they were programmed with.
We need to remember, AI is a machine. We should never put all of our faith into the works of our hands.

