Saint Thomas Aquinas (1225 – 7 March 1274), was a Doctor of the Church, Philosopher, Theologian, Jurist, Dominican Friar, and Priest. Known as Doctor Angelicus "Angelic Doctor," and the Doctor Communis "Universal Doctor" his writings serve as a defense and proof of the validity of Christ's authority over all. The Summa contra Gentiles (also known as Liber de veritate catholicae fidei contra errores infidelium, "Book on the truth of the Catholic faith against the errors of the unbelievers"). The Summa contra Gentiles consists of four books. The structure of Saint Thomas's work is designed to proceed from general philosophical arguments for monotheism, to which Muslims and Jews are likely to consent even within their own respective religious traditions, before progressing to the discussion of specifically Christian doctrine.
Musings of an Old Curmudgeon
The musings and meandering thoughts of a crotchety old man as he observes life in the world and in a small, rural town in South East Nebraska. I hope to help people get to Heaven by sharing prayers, meditations, the lives of the Saints, and news of Church happenings. My Pledge: Nulla dies sine linea ~ Not a day without a line.
03 November 2026
Summa Contra Gentiles, Book III: XXXIV Man’s Ultimate Happiness Doesn’t Consist in Acts of Moral Virtue
Saint Thomas Aquinas (1225 – 7 March 1274), was a Doctor of the Church, Philosopher, Theologian, Jurist, Dominican Friar, and Priest. Known as Doctor Angelicus "Angelic Doctor," and the Doctor Communis "Universal Doctor" his writings serve as a defense and proof of the validity of Christ's authority over all. The Summa contra Gentiles (also known as Liber de veritate catholicae fidei contra errores infidelium, "Book on the truth of the Catholic faith against the errors of the unbelievers"). The Summa contra Gentiles consists of four books. The structure of Saint Thomas's work is designed to proceed from general philosophical arguments for monotheism, to which Muslims and Jews are likely to consent even within their own respective religious traditions, before progressing to the discussion of specifically Christian doctrine.
Catholicism's Humanist Perspective on AI
Every French Monarch
The Catholic Persecution of Science? Just a Myth
How St Hubert Overcame His Habit of Skipping Mass on Sunday
Today is his Feast Day. His legend led to him being a Patron Saint of hunters and to the Jägermeister (Master Hunter) logo being based on it.
From Aleteia
By Philip Kosloski
St. Hubert loved to hunt, and initially he didn't want a "boring" Mass to get in the way of his Sunday adventures.
For many Catholics Sunday Mass is boring. At the surface level, nothing really “happens”, and it’s not very entertaining. For many years St. Hubert heartily agreed with that statement, and when given the choice between going to Mass and bagging a deer, he thought it was a no-brainer and chose to go hunting.
Hubert was so addicted to hunting that he even went out on Good Friday! When everyone else was in church mournfully remembering the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross, St. Hubert was looking for his next prize.
Here is what happened next, as related in the Good Words magazine.
It happened that he was hunting one Good Friday in the forest, when all at once he saw a fine stag bearing between its horns a golden crucifix. For an instant Hubert paused, struck with wonder at the strange vision, then, believing it to be some delusion, he urged his horse towards the stag; but, instead of turning to fly, the [deer] stood confronting him with mild, imploring eyes, and a voice sounded in the huntsman’s ears, “Hubert, Hubert! how long will this idle passion for the chase tempt you to forget your salvation?” Conscience-stricken, Hubert dismounted, and, falling on his face, he cried out, “ Lord, what shall I do?”
Afterwards, Hubert sought the instruction of the local bishop and began a new chapter in his life. He never missed Sunday Mass for the rest of his life, no longer seeing it as something boring, but viewing it as an essential part of his salvation.
We may not always understand what happens at Mass, but we should at least understand that God instituted it for our spiritual well-being. The Mass can change us in ways we may not recognize at first, but over time its effects can be felt in our lives.
As the saying goes, “The more you put into it, the more you get out of it.” If you think Mass is boring, maybe you need to think differently about it, putting more effort in understanding it and opening your heart to God each Sunday.
Whatever your situation might be, pray to St. Hubert and ask him to help you see the beauty in Mass that eyes do not always see.
35 Strange Things in Medieval Peasant Homes That Were Actually Brilliant
From Medieval Way
Medieval Way explores the ingenious domestic adaptations used by households in the 14th century to combat the relentless threats of fire and water. By examining everyday objects and architectural features, this tour reveals how these practical solutions shaped the daily lives and survival strategies of rural populations.
Why would anyone smear cow dung on the walls they slept beside? Walk into a peasant house in thirteen-eighty and that is only the first strange thing. The floor sits lower than the yard outside. A strip of ground under the roof edge has its own name, and so do the people caught standing in it. In the towns, a bell rings every evening, and every household does the same small thing to its fire. It all looks like poverty. That reading is wrong. Almost all of those things were fighting one of two enemies. Water came at that house from outside, every day. Fire lived in the middle of it, every night. Either one could take everything the family owned before morning. Today we count down thirty-five, from the drip line to the embers, and three get paid off by name. A word for listening at walls that comes from rainwater. The tool a lord confiscated and set into his own floor. And that bell, still in your vocabulary.
Traditional Catholic Morning Prayers in English | November
Who Was St Malachy and Did He Predict the Last Pope?
Today is his Feast Day, but NO, he did not predict the last Pope. The "prophecy" wasn't discovered until centuries after St Malachy's death. It's fairly accurate up until the "discovery", then it gets difficult to decipher.
From Aleteia
By Philip Kosloski
St. Malachy was an Irish saint of the 12th century who has become famous for prophecies attributed to him that describe the final pope.
The election of a new pope has provoked some Catholics to consult the ancient prophecies attributed to St. Malachy.
One of the most famous prophecies that people connect to him is the belief that the last pope will have the name "Petrus Romanus," or "Peter the Roman."
Where did this prophecy come from and who was St. Malachy?
St. Malachy
What is true is that St. Malachy did exist and he lived in Ireland during the 12th century. St. Bernard of Clairvaux even wrote his biography.
St. Malachy became the archbishop of Armagh in 1132 and was known for restoring discipline in the local Church. He was a holy man and well revered for his leadership in Ireland at the time.
The Catholic Encyclopedia explains how he became friends with St. Bernard,
Early in 1139 he journeyed to Rome, via Scotland, England, and France, visiting St. Bernard at Clairvaux. He petitioned Pope Innocent for palliums for the Sees of Armagh and Cashel, and was appointed legate for Ireland. On his return visit to Clairvaux he obtained five monks for a foundation in Ireland, under Christian, an Irishman, as superior: thus arose the great Abbey of Mellifont in 1142.
St. Malachy set out on a second journey to Rome in 1148, but on arriving at Clairvaux he fell sick, and died in the arms of St. Bernard, on November 2.
That certainly is a way to die, in the arms of a beloved saint!
He also reportedly had the gift of prophecy, but that is where things get murky.
Prophecy of the popes
There exists a prophecy, attributed to St. Malachy, that details a line of 112 popes. Each pope is matched with a mystical title that is supposed to be connected in some way to that pope. (Francis was the 266th pope.)
The best known part of the prophecy is that "Peter the Roman" will be the last pope, as the Catholic Encyclopedia explains:
In the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church there will reign Peter the Roman, who will feed his flock amid many tribulations, after which the seven-hilled city will be destroyed and the dreadful Judge will judge the people. The End.
One of biggest problems with this prophecy is that it was not discovered until 1590, 400 years after St. Malachy's death.
A theory says that it was "hidden" in the Roman archives. However, one curious clue that detracts from the authenticity is the fact that the prophecies are fairly accurate until 1590, and then afterwards they are hit or miss. Some believe that a different person formulated this prophecy and connected it to St. Malachy.
Regardless of whether or not St. Malachy wrote it, the prophecy would fall under "private revelation," and Catholics are not bound to believe in it.
God is the only one who knows what will happen and who will be the last pope before the end of the world and the Second Coming. Anything that we try to predict will fall short, as our knowledge is imperfect so long as we live on this earth.
02 November 2026
A Tale of Two Dioceses: Traditionalism vs. The "Spirit" of Vatican II
In the Archdiocese of Portland, Oregon, Fr. Nicholas Martell made headlines by encouraging parishioners to learn the ordinary prayers of the Mass in Latin and embrace Gregorian chant…literally putting into practice the actual decrees of Sacrosanctum Concilium. Meanwhile, clear across the country in the Diocese of Charlotte, North Carolina, Bishop Michael Martin has taken a radically different approach with a sweeping liturgical crackdown. Is this level of liturgical whiplash sustainable for the lay faithful? What does true unity look like under Pope Leo XIV, and will it take papal action to re-anchor the Church in sacred tradition?
A Personal Memory of Today's Saint, Patron of Hunters
Today is the Feast of St Hubert, Patron Saint of hunters. When I was much younger, I enjoyed hunting small game. I was never much of an upland bird man; those speedy little devils are hard to hit with a shotgun! But rabbits and squirrels learned to fear me and my .22 calibre rifle. As a result of my love of hunting, for years I wore a medal of St Hubert, Patron of Hunters.
One day, many years ago, a friend and I were in a pub one afternoon, sipping on a few pints. A fellow sitting next to me ordered a 'Jäger'. I had never heard of it, so when the barman took the bottle from the cooler to pour the shot, I looked at it. The logo caught my eye, and I asked if I could see it.
I then turned to my friend and said, 'Let me show you something'. I pulled my 'medal chain' from my shirt and showed him a medal with the logo and a man kneeling in front of it. It was a medal of St Hubert, Patron Saint of Hunters. The logo is based on the iconography of St Hubert of Liege. Fitting, because in German, 'Jägermeister' means 'Master Hunter'.
Unfortunately, my friend, realising that I was unfamiliar with the drink, insisted on buying a few shots. Whilst I'm one of those odd people who actually like Jägermeister neat (I love the taste of black liquorice, the predominant flavour in the liqueur), it is not a good idea to drink a 'few' shots after more than a few pints of beer! I didn't become sinfully drunk, but I regretted it.
Here is a look at the life of St Hubert, and a selection of prayers in his honour.
From Aleteia
By Philip Kosloski
Born in the 7th century, St. Hubert liked to skip Mass on Sundays to go hunting. He was obsessed with the hunt so much so that he even went out on Good Friday to bag himself a deer.
While everyone else was at church for the Good Friday service, Hubert was out pursuing an amazing stag. He was about to kill the deer when the animal abruptly turned around and looked right at Hubert. Between the stag’s antlers was a glowing crucifix, and a voice from heaven called out to him, “Hubert, unless you turn to the Lord, and lead a holy life, you shall quickly go down to hell.”
Afterwards, Hubert sought the instruction of the local bishop and began a new chapter in his life. Among other activities, Hubert became a strong promoter of ethical hunting practices and urged hunters to treat animals with respect, avoiding any kind of cruelty. He was a holy man, renowned for his preaching and his new pursuit as a “hunter of souls.”
His association with hunting led the Church to name Hubert patron saint of furriers and trappers, hunters, hunting, and hunting dogs. Over the years a St. Hubert medal was developed that has his image as well as a deer with a cross between its antlers. Many hunters bring along this medal with them while hunting, asking for Hubert’s intercession for a safe and successful hunt. Some parishes even have an annual blessing of St. Hubert medals that are passed out to all the hunters.
If you plan on going hunting, here is a collection of prayers to St. Hubert, including a novena of prayers to be said between October 26 – November 3 (or whenever you typically go hunting). Below are a few prayers from that collection.
Prayer to be an honorable hunter
Why Did a Group of Bishops Support Lula and Consider Flávio Bolsonaro a Threat to Democracy?
Because, like many Episcopates in the West, the Brazilian Bishops are packed with hard-left, liberal Bishops, many of them appointed by Francis.
From One Peter Five
By Vinícius Couzzi Mérida, PhD
Brazil’s political situation is complex. Since the June 2013 protests, when demonstrations swept through hundreds of cities, the country has experienced successive crises and deepening polarization. Initially heterogeneous, those protests expressed a range of grievances and marked a turning point in public life. In the years that followed, rivalry between the Right and the Left intensified, reaching families, institutions, and religious communities. During the 2026 elections, Brazilian Catholicism also participated in this process, both through initiatives promoting dialogue and through its leaders’ political positions, which drew support and protests from millions of Catholics.
Against this backdrop, more than 60 bishops signed a letter whose content favored Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and rejected Flávio Bolsonaro, son of former president Jair Bolsonaro. This statement must be understood in historical perspective: it reflects a current within Catholicism that brings together evangelization, grassroots organizing, the defense of workers, and the preferential option for the poor.
Its roots lie in the pastoral and social transformations that developed from the 1950s onward, during the period when the National Conference of Bishops of Brazil (CNBB) was founded. This renewal deserves a separate analysis, which we will develop in another article. Here, it is important to clarify that the electoral support came from the bishops who signed the letter in their individual capacities and did not constitute an official endorsement by the episcopal conference.
The letter released before the second round did not name the candidates. Nevertheless, its descriptions made the authors’ preference identifiable. The candidate presented as committed to the poor, workers, environmental protection, and the democratic order was Lula. The candidate portrayed as a threat to democracy, social rights, and national sovereignty (including through his alignment with the United States), was Flávio Bolsonaro. The endorsement was indirect in its wording but clear in its political meaning.
Some signatory bishops stated that they were merely offering criteria for Christian discernment without asking for votes. This explanation describes the document’s form but does not eliminate its electoral direction. Omitting names does not make a message neutral: the selection of issues and the comparison between the candidates communicated an identifiable choice. It is therefore reasonable to interpret the letter as electoral support for Lula, although without an explicit request to vote for him by name.
To understand this convergence, we must look back at the history of the Catholic Church in Brazil. Founded in 1952, the CNBB brought together different theological and political outlooks. It did not begin as a uniformly Left-wing institution. In 1964, its leadership supported the ousting of President João Goulart (1919–1976). Subsequently, in response to repression, torture, and persecution, episcopal denunciations of Brazil’s military dictatorship became more widespread. The defense of human rights gained prominence, although some bishops continued to support the regime.
The Second Vatican Council, held between 1962 and 1965, and the Latin American episcopal conferences in Medellín in 1968 and Puebla in 1979 provided reference points for pastoral renewal. Poverty increasingly came to be examined as a consequence of economic structures and power relations. For sectors of the Church, evangelization meant confronting conditions that denied people their dignity.
This engagement contributed to accusations of Communism against members of the progressive clergy. Some accusations reflected substantive disputes over the use of Marxism; others confused any advocacy of social reform with Communist allegiance. This distinction matters: commitment to the poor can bring Catholics closer to Left-wing organizations without implying full acceptance of their ideologies.
Building on earlier experiences of social Catholicism, Liberation Theology developed its own distinctive formulation in the 1960s. It connected reflection on faith with the historical experience of the poor and the possibilities for social transformation. Its different formulations, particularly the use of Marxist categories, generated controversy and prompted doctrinal interventions from Rome in the 1980s, during the pontificate of John Paul II, with Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger playing a central role.
Basic Ecclesial Communities (Comunidades Eclesiais de Base, CEBs) were fundamental to this process. Some experiences preceded the systematization of Liberation Theology; many subsequently became settings for its reception. Organized in neighborhoods, urban outskirts, and rural areas, they brought people together to celebrate their faith, read the Bible, and reflect on everyday problems. Unemployment, land conflicts, and inadequate housing became part of community discussion.
The CNBB formally recognized their importance, particularly in Document 25 of 1982. The CEBs also helped develop leaders: participants learned to organize meetings, speak publicly, formulate demands, and act collectively. Under a dictatorship that restricted political participation, Church settings provided spaces for gathering and mobilization. These experiences fostered ties among Catholic activists, trade unions, grassroots movements, and left-wing organizations.
The Workers’ Party (Partido dos Trabalhadores, PT), founded on February 10, 1980, emerged from a convergence of trade unionists, intellectuals, Left-wing activists, and members of the CEBs and other expressions of social Catholicism. Having risen to prominence through the mobilization of metalworkers in São Paulo’s ABC industrial region, Lula became its principal leader. Catholic participation was significant, but the party was not institutionally founded by the Church or the CNBB.
These origins explain why the relationship between the PT and certain Catholic sectors extends beyond occasional electoral alliances. There are shared histories, personal ties, and decades of experience in grassroots organizing. The relationship also involves conflict: pastoral workers may support the party while criticizing its governments, alliances, and decisions.
In rural areas, the Pastoral Land Commission (Comissão Pastoral da Terra, CPT) became particularly important. It was established in June 1975 during a meeting of Amazonian bishops and prelates in Goiânia. Its emergence responded to violence against squatters and rural workers, concentrated land ownership, and labor exploitation. The CPT began accompanying communities, denouncing abuses, and supporting the organization of rural populations, developing a pastoral ministry with social and political consequences.
The Landless Rural Workers’ Movement (Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra, MST) was established nationally in 1984 in Cascavel, Paraná, bringing together different experiences of struggle for land. The CPT helped connect workers and leaders involved in this process. The movement nevertheless developed its own leadership and organization. Its proximity to pastoral workers and the PT does not negate its autonomy or the disagreements it has had with PT governments.
The Youth Pastoral Ministry (Pastoral da Juventude, PJ), drawing on the legacy of Catholic Action, became more organized particularly during the 1970s. Its groups combined Christian formation, community life, and reflection on social realities. Gatherings and educational activities encouraged young people’s participation. Some of its leaders later joined student movements, trade unions, grassroots organizations, and political parties, including the PT.
The University Pastoral Ministry (Pastoral Universitária, PU) has historical roots in Catholic University Youth (Juventude Universitária Católica, JUC), an important expression of Catholic engagement in student life. Its work connects faith, knowledge, academic life, and social responsibility. Parts of this milieu engaged with progressive perspectives and movements for political transformation. Its history nevertheless encompasses different orientations and cannot be reduced to party activism.
The Workers’ Pastoral Ministry (Pastoral Operária, PO) developed in different regions, especially during the 1970s, with participants from Young Christian Workers (Juventude Operária Católica, JOC), Workers’ Catholic Action (Ação Católica Operária, ACO), and other initiatives. Its work addressed wages, unemployment, working conditions, trade union organizing, and life on the urban periphery. This engagement encouraged closer ties with the labor movement and sectors of the left.
The PT, MST, CPT, PJ, PU, and PO therefore differ in nature. The PT is a political party; the MST is a social movement; the other organizations belong to the sphere of pastoral ministry. Their histories nevertheless intersect through shared activists and converging commitments to social rights. This network helps explain the affinity of certain sectors of the episcopate with Lula.
When considering the bishops’ orientation, we must distinguish doctrinal, economic, and electoral positions. A bishop may uphold Catholic teaching on abortion, euthanasia, and marriage while supporting labor rights, agrarian reform, and greater state intervention in the economy. He may also reject Bolsonarism without considering himself Left-wing. Conventional political classifications do not fully capture these combinations.
The CNBB grounds its work in Catholic social teaching, which values the common good, solidarity, subsidiarity, and human dignity. Its criticism of the subordination of social life to economic interests can bring it closer to causes championed by the Left. Nevertheless, this teaching also recognizes private property, economic initiative, and limits on state intervention. Reducing it to Communism or a party platform impoverishes our understanding of it.
In my interpretation, the language prevailing in the CNBB’s social engagement is closer to the center and center-Left than to the Bolsonaro-aligned Right. Some bishops identify with Right-wing positions, but this orientation does not determine the institution’s statements as a whole. This interpretation allows us to discuss a predominantly Left-leaning outlook in its public engagement, but it does not establish the numerical ideological distribution of the episcopate.
Many clergy members sympathetic to progressive causes likewise do not describe themselves as “Left-wing bishops.” They ground their positions in the Gospel and pastoral responsibility. This foundation can be sincere while also producing electoral effects. Understanding their orientation requires examining their priorities, interlocutors, and concrete positions, beyond the labels they accept or reject.
There is a difference in style compared with certain Protestant leaders who endorse candidates, appear at campaign rallies, and associate electoral projects with divine will. Some Catholic bishops prefer the language of moral and pastoral criteria. This discretion does not imply the absence of a position: a preference can be communicated without naming names. Neither style, however, characterizes all bishops or all pastors.
In the manifesto, criticisms of Flávio Bolsonaro concerned labor rights, access to firearms, environmental protection, national sovereignty, his closeness to the United States and Donald Trump, and doubts about his commitment to democracy. In the signatory bishops’ assessment, Lula was more compatible with these priorities. These judgments belong to the letter’s authors: their religious foundation does not automatically turn an electoral assessment into binding doctrinal teaching. Accordingly, the bishops’ letter was accepted by millions of Catholics and rejected by millions of others.
Nor is Catholic social teaching entirely synonymous with the PT’s platform. Agreement on certain policies coexists with disagreement on life, family, and other issues. Supporting a candidacy represents a choice between historical alternatives without implying unconditional approval of the party or its government.
Following Lula’s victory on October 25, 2026, the CNBB congratulated the reelected presidential ticket and called for priority to be given to the poor, reconciliation, and respect for institutions. It also reaffirmed the defense of life from conception to natural death. This statement following the result must be distinguished from the electoral support previously expressed by the signatory bishops.
Flávio Bolsonaro’s departure for the United States, with the Trump administration’s support for his entry, added another element to the post-election situation. The episode relates to the signatories’ concerns about foreign alignment, but it does not reveal how the bishops voted. Political support for his admission also does not necessarily amount to a personal reception by the U.S. president.
The history examined here makes it plausible that support for Lula extended beyond the group of signatory bishops, possibly reaching a majority of the episcopate. This hypothesis nevertheless remains unproven: voting is secret, and the signatures do not constitute a representative sample.
More than 60 bishops expressed politically clear electoral support for Lula, without episcopal unanimity or the CNBB’s official endorsement. This choice reflects a Catholic tradition that places social issues at the center of its concerns and finds common ground with sectors of the Left. Understanding it requires recognizing its historical ties and political effects while preserving the distinction between electoral preference and doctrinal authority in a country that remains far from political reconciliation.
St Hubert, Bishop & Confessor
Rome, wishing to admit as few interruptions as possible into the present great Octave, gives but a brief notice of St. Hubert in the Martyrology. It is fitting that we should imitate her reserve. Were we, however to omit all mention of him, Christian hunters, so faithful in proclaiming their glorious Patron, would not forgive us. It is right also to satisfy popular piety, and the gratitude of numberless clients saved from hydrophobia, and led to the feet of the Saint by a tradition of a thousand years’ standing. A few words suffice to recount his life.
After the mysterious stag had revealed Christ to him, he became, from a hunter of wild animals, a hunter of souls; and merited to be called the Apostle of Ardenne, whose forests had often echoed to the baying of his hounds. He became the disciple and successor of St. Lambert; and transferring from Maestricht both the relics of the holy Martyr-Bishop and the Episcopal See, he raised Liege from an obscure village to a great town. His blessed death took place on May 30th, 727; and on November 3rd, 743, his precious remains were taken up for the first time, which led to the celebration of his feast on this day. In the following century, the Abbey of Andain was put in possession of the sacred deposit; and took from him the name of St. Hubert, as did likewise the town which sprang up around and soon became a center for pilgrimages. Two orders of knighthood were established in honor of St. Hubert; the first perished with the fall of the Bourbons its last chiefs; the other still exists, and the kings of Bavaria are its Grand-Masters.
ANTIPHONS
Hail, glory of Confessors; hail, companion of Angels: give us present joy, which may become eternal bliss: by thy prayer, well-pleasing to God, save the healthy, heal the sick.
℣. The Lord hath led the just man through righteous ways.
℟. And shewn him the kingdom of God.
(Proper Office of the Abbey of St. Scholastica of Juvigny-les-Dames, where a tooth of St. Hubert was kept.)
PRAYER
Be propitious, we beseech O Lord, to us thy servants, through the glorious merits of St. Hubert thy Confessor and Bishop, that by his loving intercession we may ever be protected from all adversities. Through our Lord.
How to Overcome Sins of Impurity | The Two Great Remedies
St Hubert, Bishop of Liege, Confessor
GOD, who is wonderful in his mercies above all his works, called St. Hubert from a worldly life to his service in an extraordinary manner; though the circumstances of this event are so obscured by popular inconsistent relations, that we have no authentic account of his actions before he was engaged in the service of the church under the discipline of St. Lambert, bishop of Maestricht. He is said to have been a nobleman of Aquitain; passed his youth in the court of Theodoric III. and probably spent some time in the service of Pepin of Herstal, who became mayor of the palace of Austrasia in 681. He is also said to have been passionately addicted to the diversion of hunting, and was entirely taken up in worldly pursuits, when, moved by divine grace, he resolved at once to renounce the school of vanity, and enter himself in that of Christ, in which his name had been enrolled in baptism. St. Lambert was the experienced and skilful master by whose direction he studied to divest himself of the spirit of the world, and to put on that of Jesus Christ: and to learn to overcome enemies and injuries by meekness, and patience, not by revenge and pride, rather to sink under, than to vanquish them. His extraordinary fervour, and the great progress which he made in virtue and learning strongly recommended him to St. Lambert, who ordained him priest, and intrusted him with the principal share in the administration of his diocess. That holy prelate being barbarously murdered in 681, St. Hubert was unanimously chosen his successor, and the death of his dear master inflamed him with a holy desire of martyrdom, of which he sought all occasions. For charity conceives no other sentiments from wrongs, and knows no other revenge for the most atrocious injuries than the most tender concern and regard for sinners, and a desire of returning all good offices for evil received; thus to overcome evil by good, and invincibly maintain justice. St. Hubert never ceased with David to deplore his banishment from the face of God, and tears almost continually watered his cheeks. His revenues he consecrated to the service of the poor, and his labours to the extirpation of vice and of the remains of idolatry. His fervour in fasting, watching, and prayer far from ever abating seemed every day to increase; and he preached the word of God assiduously, with so much sweetness and energy, and with such unction of the Holy Ghost, that it was truly in his mouth a two-edged sword, and the people flocked from distant places to hear it from him. Out of devotion to the memory of St. Lambert, in the thirteenth year of his episcopal dignity, he translated his bones from Maestricht to Liege, then a very commodious and agreeable village upon the banks of the Meuse, which from this treasure very soon grew into a flourishing city, to which the ruins of Herstal, a mile distant, and of several other palaces and fortresses on the Meuse, contributed not a little. St. Hubert placed the relics of the martyr in a stately church which he built upon the spot where he had spilt his blood, which our saint made his cathedral, removing thither the episcopal see from Maestricht in 721, which St. Servatius had translated from Tongres to Maestricht in 382. Hence St. Lambert is honoured at Liege as principal patron, and St. Hubert as founder of the city and church, and its first bishop. 1
The great forest of Ardenne, famous in the Commentaries of Julius Cæsar and later writers, was in many parts a shelter for idolatry down to that age. 1 St. Hubert, with incredible zeal penetrated into the most remote and barbarous places of this country, and abolished the worship of idols; and as he performed the office of the apostles, God bestowed on him a like gift of miracles. Amongst others the author of his life relates as an eye-witness, that on the three days’ fast of the Rogations which the whole church observes, the holy bishop went out of the city of Maestricht in procession, through the fields and villages with his clergy and people, according to custom, following the standard of the cross and the relics of the saints, and singing the litany. This religious procession was disturbed in its devotions by a woman possessed by an evil spirit; but the holy bishop silenced her and restored her to her health by signing her with the cross. In the time of a great drought he obtained rain by his prayers. A year before his happy death he was advertised of it in a vision, and favoured with a sight of a place prepared for him in glory. Though the foreknowledge which faith gives us of the great change for which we wait the divine will, be equally sufficient to raise up our hearts thither, the saint from that time redoubled his fervour in sighing after that bliss, and in putting his house in order; and reserved to himself more time for visiting the altars, and the shrines of the saints, especially the tomb of St. Lambert, and the altar of St. Albinus, commending his soul to God through the intercession of the saints with many tears. Going to dedicate a new church at Fur, (which seems to be Terture in Brabant,) twelve leagues from Liege, he preached there his farewell sermon; immediately after which he betook himself to bed ill of a fever, and on the sixth day of his sickness, reciting to his last breath the Creed and the Lord’s Prayer, sweetly reposed in Christ, on the 30th of May, in 727. His body was conveyed to Liege, and deposited in the collegiate church of St. Peter. 2 With the leave of the bishop, and of the emperor Lewis Debonnair, it was translated, in 825, to the abbey of Andain, since called St. Hubert’s, in the Ardennes, on the frontiers of the duchy of Luxemburg. The abbot is lord of the territory, which comprises sixteen villages. The shrine of St. Hubert is resorted to by many pilgrims, and has been honoured by many miraculous cures, especially of persons bit by mad dogs. 3 The principal feast of St. Hubert, probably on account of some translation, is kept on the 3rd of November. See the history of his life from the time of his conversion, written by one who had conversed familiarly with him; also the History of the Translation of his relics to Andain (or St. Hubert’s) by Jonas, (probably the Bishop of Orleans,) and an anonymous history of his miracles compiled in the eleventh age, all published by Mabillon, Sæc. Ben. 4, p. 293, &c. Likewise Le Cointe and Miræus, in their Annals of France and Belgium; Placentius, Hist. Episcoporum, Leod. p. 272, Buxhorn, Antiq. Leod. p. 7, &c. 2
Note 1. A small district on both sides of the Meuse still retains the name of the country of Ardenne. The ancient forest of that name was inclosed betwixt the Rhine and the Meuse. Some authors have extended it on one side into Champagne, and on the other as far as the Scheldt. Those at least who carry it beyond this river into Artois, seem to take this name of Ardenne for any great wood, as the Romans understood the word Hercynian. On which account they called by the same name Hercynia the whole great German forest, which was extended from the Ardennes or the Rhine, through all Germany to the Danube. They seem to have mistaken the German word Hartz, a wood, and the plural Hartzen, for an appellative, which they corrupted into Hercynia. The name of Hercynian or Hartz-Forest is given by moderns only to that wood which it thirty English miles broad, and about sixty long, situated in Brunswic-Lunenburg, Thuringia, Anhalt, and Hildersheim. See the Natural History of Hartz-Forest by H. Behrens, M.D. [back]
Note 2. The military order of knights of St. Hubert was instituted by Gerard V., duke of Cleves and Gueldres, in memory of his victory gained in 1444, on St. Hubert’s day, over the house of Egmont, which pretended a claim to those duchies. The knights wore a gold collar ornamented with hunting horns: on which hung a medal with an image of St. Hubert before their breast. The duke of Neuburgh became heir to Cleves, and in 1685 was made elector palatine of the Rhine. This honour is since conferred by the elector palatine on certain gentlemen of his court with pensions. The knights now wear a gold collar with a cross and an image of St. Hubert, &c. See Statuta Ordinis Militaris S. Huberti a ser. Principe Joan. Gul. Comite Palatino Rheni S. R. J. elect. renovati. an. 1708. Also the Jesuit Bonanni, Schoonebeck, Bern. Giustiniani and F. Honoratus of St. Mary in their histories of military orders of knighthood. [back]
Note 3. Against this dreadful venom the blessing of heaven is so much the more earnestly to be implored, as no confidence can be placed in bathing in the sea or other vulgar remedies, as Somerville truly observes; neither is the new secret a sure prescription, though it sometimes succeeds. Nevertheless, superstitious notions and practices, which easily creep into the best devotions amongst the vulgar, cannot be too carefully guarded against on all occasions, and require the particular attention of all pastors concerned in these pilgrimages, &c. at St. Hubert’s, that every practice be regulated and directed by true piety and religion. See Dr. Thiers, Traités des Superstitions, l. 6, c. 4, p. 107. F. Le Brun, Hist. Crit. des Pratiques Superstit. l. 4, c. 4, p. 195. Raynaud, t. 8, p. 114. Bend. XIV. de Canoniz. &c. [back]
St Malachy, Confessor, Archbishop of Ardmach or Armagh
From Fr Alban Butler's Lives of the Saints:
From St. Bernard’s Life,1. 4, c. 4, and the Life of St. Malachy, written by St. Bernard himself, partly from his own knowledge, and partly from relations sent him from Ireland by the abbot Congan, t. 2, p. 663 ad p. 698. ed. Mabill. Also St. Bernard’s Letters, ep. 341, (p. 314, t. 1,) ad Malachiam Hiberni Archiep anno 1140, ep. 356, (p. 223, anno 1141,) ad Malachiam Hiberni Archiep. sedis Apostolic legatum: and ep. 374, anno 1148, (p. 337,) ad Fratres de Hibernia. de Transitu Malachi, giving his brethren in Ireland an account of his death. Also St. Bernard’s two Sermons, one spoken at his funeral, in transitu S. Malachi, (p. 1048, t. 3,) the other on his anniversary festival, entitled. De S. Malachi, p, 1052, t. 3, ed. Mabill. See the bull of the canonization of St. Malachy, published by Mabillon, ib. p. 698. St. Bernard’s discourses on St. Malachy are ranked amongst the most methodical and elegant of his writings. He seems to surpass himself when he speaks of this saint. The Jesuit Maffei, a true judge and passionate student of eloquence, placed his translation of St. Bernard’s Life of St. Malachy the first among the seventeen elegant lives of confessors which he published in Italian.
A. D. 1148.
IN the fifth century Ireland was converted from heathenism to Christianity. Through the three succeeding ages it became the principal seat of learning in Christendom. So happy a distinction was owing to the labors and apostolic lives of the native ecclesiastics, who were never known to abuse the great immunities and secular endowments conferred on them by the Irish princes. This change from idolatry to the gospel was brought about in a period when the Roman empire in the West was torn to pieces, and when inundations of pagan nations seized on the greater part of Europe. In that state, providence, ever watchful over the church, erected an asylum in this remote island for its repose and extension. For three hundred years the Christian youth of the continent flocked hither to be instructed in the science of the saints, and in the literature which leads to it. In the ninth century, Ireland began to feel the grievances which followed the invasion of the sanctuary in other countries. It was infested in its turn by heathen barbarians, who under the general name of Normans, ravaged at the same time the maritime districts of France, England, and Scotland; and, finally, made establishments in all. Nothing sacred had escaped their depredations: wherever their power prevailed they massacred the ecclesiastics, demolished the monasteries, and committed their libraries to the flames. In these confusions the civil power was weakened; and kings contending with a foreign enemy, and with vassals often equally dangerous, lost much of their authority. The national assemblies, the guardians and framers of law, were seldom convened; and when convened, they wanted the power, perhaps the wisdom, to restore the old constitution, or establish a better on its ruins. Through a long and unavoidable intercourse between the natives and the oppressors of religion and law, a great relaxation of piety and morals gradually took place. Vice and ignorance succeeded to the Christian virtues, and to knowledge. Factions among the governors of provinces ended in a dissolution of the Irish monarchy, on the demise of Malachy II., in 1022; and, through the accumulation of so many evils, the nation was, in a great degree, sunk in barbarism.
It was in this state of the nation that the glorious saint, whose life we are writing, was born. Malachy,* called in Irish Maol-Maodhog O Morgair,1 was a native of Armagh: his parents were persons of the first rank, and very virtuous, especially his mother, who was most solicitous to train him up in the fear of God. When he was of age to go to school, not content to procure him pious tutors while he studied grammar at Armagh,* she never ceased at home to instil into his tender mind the most perfect sentiments and maxims of piety; which were deeply imprinted in his heart by that interior master in whose school he was from his infancy a great proficient. He was meek, humble, obedient, modest, obliging to all, and very diligent in his studies; he was temperate in diet, vanquished sleep, and had no inclination to childish sports and diversions, so that he far outstripped his fellow students in learning, and his very masters in virtue. In his studies, devotions, and little practices of penance he was very cautious and circumspect to shun as much as possible the eyes of others, and all danger of vain-glory, the most baneful poison of virtues. For this reason he spent not so much time in churches as he desired to do, but prayed much in retired places, and at all times frequently lifted up his pure hands and heart to heaven in such a manner as not to be taken notice of. When his master took a walk to a neighboring village without any other company but this beloved scholar, the pious youth often remained a little behind to send up with more liberty, as it were by stealth, short inflamed ejaculations from the bow of his heart, which was always bent, says St. Bernard.
To learn more perfectly the art of dying to himself, and living wholly to God and his love, Malachy put himself under the discipline of a holy recluse named Imar, or Imarius, who led a most austere life in continual prayer in a cell near the great church of Armagh. This step in one of his age and quality astonished the whole city, and many severely censured and laughed at him for it; many ascribed this undertaking to melancholy, fickleness, or the rash heat of youth; and his friends grieved and reproached him, not being able to bear the thought that one of so delicate a constitution and so fine accomplishments and dispositions for the world, should embrace a state of such rigor, and, in their eyes, so mean and contemptible. The saint valued not their censures, and learned by despising them with humility and meekness to vanquish both the world and himself. To attain to the true love of God he condemned himself while alive, as it were, to the grave, says St. Bernard, and submitted himself to the rule of a man; not being like those who undertake to teach what they have never learned, and by seeking to gather and multiply scholars without having ever been at school, become blind guides of the blind. The simplicity of the disciple’s obedience, his love of silence, and his fervor in mortification and prayer, were both the means and the marks of his spiritual progress, which infinitely endeared him to his master, and edified even those who at first had condemned his choice. Their railleries were soon converted into praises, and their contempt into admiration: and many, moved by the example of his virtue, desired to be his imitators and companions in that manner of life. Malachy prevailed upon Imar to admit the most fervent among these petitioners, and they soon formed a considerable community. Malachy was by his eminent virtues a model to all the rest, though he always looked upon himself as the least and most unworthy of that religious society. A disciple so meek, so humble, so obedient, so mortified and devout, could not fail, by the assiduous exercises of penance and prayer, to advance apace to the summit of evangelical perfection. Imar, his superior, and Celsus or Ceallach, archbishop of Armagh,* judged him worthy of holy orders, and this prelate obliged him, notwithstanding all the resistance he could make, to receive at his hands the order of deacon, and some time after, the priesthood, when he was twenty-five years old, though the age which the canons then required for priestly orders was thirty years, as St. Bernard testifies; but his extraordinary merit was just reason for dispensing with that rule. At the same time, the archbishop made him his vicar to preach the word of God to the rude people and to extirpate evil customs, which were many, grievous, and inveterate, and most horribly disfigured the face of that church. Wonderful was the zeal with which St. Malachy discharged this commission; abuses and vices were quite defeated and dispersed before his face; barbarous customs were abolished, diabolical charms and superstitions were banished; and whatever squared not with the rule of the gospel could not stand before him. He seemed to be a flame amidst the forests, or a hook extirpating noxious plants: with a giant’s heart he appeared at work on every side. He made several regulations in ecclesiastical discipline, which were authorized by the bishops, and settled the regular solemn rehearsal of the canonical hours in all the churches of the diocese, which, since the Danish invasions, had been omitted even in cities: in which it was of service to him that from his youth he had applied himself to the church music. What was yet of much greater importance, he renewed the use of the sacraments, especially of confession or penance, of confirmation, and regular matrimony. St. Malachy, fearing lest he was not sufficiently skilled in the canons of the church to carry on a thorough reformation of discipline, and often laboring under great anxiety of mind on this account, resolved, with the approbation of his prelate, to repair for some time to Malchus, bishop of Lismore, who had been educated in England where he became a monk of Winchester, and was then for his learning and sanctity reputed the oracle of all Ireland. Being courteously received by this good old man, he was diligently instructed by him in all things belonging to the divine service, and to the care of souls, and, at the same time, he employed his ministry in that church.
Ireland being at that time divided into several little kingdoms,† it happened that Cormac, king of Munster, was dethroned by his wicked brother, and, in his misfortunes, had recourse to bishop Malchus, not to recover his crown, but to save his soul; fearing him who takes away the spirit of princes, and being averse from shedding more blood for temporal interests. At the news of the arrival of such a guest, Malchus made preparations to receive him with due honor; but the king would by no means consent to his desires, declaring it was his intention to think no more of worldly pomp, but to live among his canons, to put on sackcloth, and labor by penance to secure to himself the possession of an eternal kingdom. Malchus made him a suitable exhortation on the conditions of his sacrifice, and of a contrite heart, and assigned him a little house to lodge in, and appointed St. Malachy his master, with bread and water for his sustenance. Through our saint’s exhortations the king began to relish the sweetness of the incorruptible heavenly food of the soul, his heart was softened by compunction; and while he subdued his flesh by austerities, he washed his soul with penitential tears, like another David, never ceasing to cry out with him to God: Behold my baseness and my misery, and pardon me all my offences. The sovereign judge was not deaf to his prayer, but (according to his infinite goodness) heard it not only in the sense in which it was uttered, purely for spiritual benefits, but also with regard to the greatest temporal favors, granting him his holy grace which he asked, and in the bargain restoring him to his earthly kingdom. For a neighboring king, moved with indignation at the injury done to the majesty of kings in his expulsion, sought out the penitent in his cell, and finding him insensible to all worldly motives of interest, pressed him with those of piety, and the justice which he owed to his own subjects; and not being able yet to succeed, engaged both Malchus the bishop, and St. Malachy, to employ their authority and command, and to represent to him that justice to his people, and the divine honor, obliged him not to oppose the design. Therefore, with the succors of this king, and the activity of many loyal subjects, he was easily placed again upon the throne; and he ever after loved and honored St. Malachy as his father. Our saint was soon after called back by Celsus and Imar, both by letters and messages, to Armagh.
The great abbey of Benchor,* now in the county of Down, lay at that time in a desolate condition, and its revenues were possessed by an uncle of St. Malachy, till it should be re-established. This uncle resigned it to his holy nephew that he might settle in it regular observance, and became himself a monk under his direction in this house, which, by the care of the saint, became a flourishing seminary of learning and piety, though not so numerous as it had formerly been. St. Malachy governed this house some time, and, to use St. Bernard’s words, was in his deportment a living rule, and a bright glass, or, as it were, a book laid open in which all might learn the true precepts of religious conversation. He not only always went before his little flock, in all monastic observances, but also did particular penances, and other actions of perfection, which no man was able to equal, and he worked with his brethren in hewing timber, and in the like manual labor.
Several miraculous cures of sick persons, some of which St. Bernard recounts, added to our saint’s reputation. But the whole tenor of his life, says this saint, was the greatest of his miracles; and the composure of his mind, and the inward sanctity of his soul, appeared in his countenance, which was always modestly cheerful. A sister of our saint, who had led a worldly life, died, and he recommended her soul to God for a long time in the sacrifice of the altar. Having intermitted this for thirty days, he seemed one night to be advertised in his sleep that his sister waited with sorrow in the churchyard, and had been thirty days without food. This he understood of spiritual food; and having resumed the custom of saying mass, or causing one to be said for her every day, saw her after some time admitted to the door of the church, then within the church, and some days after to the altar, where she appeared in joy, in the midst of a troop of happy spirits; which vision gave him great comfort.2
St. Malachy, in the thirtieth year of his age, was chosen bishop of Connor, (now in the county of Antrim,) and, as he peremptorily refused to acquiesce in the election, he was at length obliged by the command of Imar and the archbishop Celsus, to submit. Upon beginning the exercise of his functions he found that his flock were Christians in name only, but in their manners savage, vicious, and worse than pagans. However, he would not run away like a hireling, but resolved to spare no pains to turn these wolves into sheep. He preached in public with an apostolical vigor, mingling tenderness with a wholesome severity; and when they would not come to the church to hear him, he sought them in the streets and in their houses, exhorted them with tenderness, and often shed tears over them. He offered to God for them the sacrifice of a contrite and humble heart, and sometimes passed whole nights weeping and with his hands stretched forth to heaven in their behalf. The remotest villages and cottages of his diocese he visited, going always on foot, and he received all manner of affronts and sufferings with invincible patience. The most savage hearts were at length softened into humanity and a sense of religion, and the saint restored the frequent use of the sacraments among the people; and whereas he found among them very few priests, and those both slothful and ignorant, he filled the diocese with zealous pastors, by whose assistance he banished ignorance and superstition, and established all religious observances, and the practice of piety. In the whole comportment of this holy man, nothing was more admirable than his invincible patience and meekness. All his actions breathed this spirit in such a manner as often to infuse the same into others. Among his miracles St. Bernard mentions, that a certain passionate woman, who was before intolerable to all that approached her, was converted into the mildest of women by the saint commanding her in the name of Christ never to be angry more, hearing her confession, and enjoining her a suitable penance; from which time no injuries or tribulations could disturb her.
After some years the city of Connor was taken and sacked by the king of Ulster; upon which St. Malachy, with a hundred and twenty disciples, retired into Munster, and there, with the assistance of king Cormac, built the monastery of Ibrac, which some suppose to have been near Cork, others in the isle of Beg-erin, where St. Imar formerly resided. While our saint governed this holy family in the strictest monastic discipline, humbling himself even to the meanest offices of the community, and, in point of holy poverty and penance, going beyond all his brethren, the archbishop Celsus was taken with that illness of which he died. In his infirmity he appointed St. Malachy to be his successor, conjuring all persons concerned, in the name of St. Patrick, the founder of that see, to concur to that promotion, and oppose the intrusion of any other person. This he not only most earnestly declared by word of mouth, but also recommended by letters to persons of the greatest interest and power in the country, particularly to the two kings of Upper and Lower Munster. This he did out of a zealous desire to abolish a most scandalous abuse which had been the source of all other disorders in the churches of Ireland. For two hundred years past, the family out of which Celsus had been assumed, and which was the most powerful in the country, had, during fifteen generations, usurped the archbishopric as an inheritance; insomuch, that when there was no clergyman of their kindred, they intruded some married man and layman of their family, who, without any holy orders, had the administration, and enjoyed the revenues of that see, and even exercised a despotic tyranny over the other bishops of the island. Notwithstanding the precaution taken by Celsus, who was a good man, after his death, though Malachy was canonically elected pursuant to his desire, Maurice, one of the above-mentioned family got possession. Malachy declined the promotion, and alleged the dangers of a tumult and bloodshed. Thus three years passed till Malchus, bishop of Lismore, and Gillebert, bishop of Limerick, who was the pope’s legate in Ireland, assembled the bishops and great men of the island, and threatened Malachy with excommunication if he refused to accept the archbishopric. Hereupon he submitted, but said, “You drag me to death. I obey in hopes of martyrdom; but, on this condition, that if the business succeed according to your desires, when all things are settled, you shall permit me to return to my former spouse, and my beloved poverty.” They promised he should have the liberty so to do, and he took upon him that charge, and exercised his functions with great zeal through the whole province, except in the city of Armagh, which he did not enter for fear of bloodshed, so long as Maurice lived, which was two years more.
At the end of five years, after the demise of Celsus, Maurice died, and, to complete his iniquities and increase his damnation, named his kinsman Nigellus for his successor. But king Cormac, and the bishops, resolved to install St. Malachy in that see, and he was acknowledged the only lawful metropolitan in the year 1133, the thirty-eighth of his age. Nigellus was obliged to leave Armagh, but carried with him two relics held by the Irish in great veneration; and the common people were foolishly persuaded that he was archbishop who had them in his possession. These were a book of the gospels which had belonged to St. Patrick, and a crosier called the staff of Jesus, which was covered with gold, and ornamented with rich jewels. By this fallacy some still adhered to him, and his kindred violently persecuted St. Malachy. One of the chief amongst them invited him to a conference at his house with a secret design to murder him. The saint, against the advice of all his friends, went thither, offering himself to martyrdom for the sake of peace; he was accompanied only by three disciples who were ready to die with him. But the courage and heavenly mildness of his countenance disarmed his enemies as soon as he appeared amongst them; and he who had designed to murder him, rose up to do him honor, and a peace was concluded on all sides. Nigellus not long after surrendered the sacred book and crosier into his hands; and several of the saint’s enemies were cut off by visible judgments. A raging pestilence, which broke out at Armagh, was suddenly averted by his prayers, and he wrought many other miracles. Having rescued that church from oppression, and restored discipline and peace, he insisted upon resigning the archiepiscopal dignity, according to covenant, and ordained Gelasius, a worthy ecclesiastic, in his place. He then returned to his former see; but whereas the two sees of Connor and Down had been long united, he again divided them, consecrated another bishop for Connor, and reserved to himself only that of Down, which was the smaller and poorer. Here he established a community of regular canons, with whom he attended to prayer and meditation, as much as the external duties of his charge would permit him. He regulated every thing and formed great designs for the divine honor.
To obtain the confirmation of many things which he had done, he undertook a journey to Rome: in which one of his motives was to procure palls for two archbishops; namely, for the see of Armagh, which had long wanted that honor through the neglect and abuses of the late usurpers, and for another metropolitical see which Celsus had formed a project of, but which had not been confirmed by the pope.* St. Malachy left Ireland in 1139; conversed some time at York with a holy priest named Sycar, an eminent servant of God, and in his way through France visited Clairvaux, where St. Bernard first became acquainted with him, and conceived the greatest affection and veneration for him on account of his sanctity. St. Malachy was so edified with the wonderful spirit of piety which he discovered in St. Bernard and his monks, that he most earnestly desired to join them in their holy exercises of penance and contemplation, and to end his days in their company; but he was never able to gain the pope’s consent to leave his bishopric. Proceeding on his journey, at Yvree in Piedmont he restored to health the child of the host with whom he lodged, who was at the point of death. Pope Innocent II. received him with great honor; but would not hear of his petition for spending the remainder of his life at Clairvaux. He confirmed all he had done in Ireland, made him his legate in that island, and promised him the pall. The saint in his return called again at Clairvaux, where, says St. Bernard, he gave us a second time his blessing. Not being able to remain himself with those servants of God, he left his heart there, and four of his companions, who taking the Cistercian habit, afterwards came over into Ireland, and instituted the abbey of Mellifont, of that order, and the parent of many others in those parts. St. Malachy went home through Scotland, where king David earnestly entreated him to restore to health his son Henry, who lay dangerously ill. The saint said to the sick prince: “Be of good courage; you will not die this time.” Then sprinkled him with holy water, and the next day the prince was perfectly recovered.
St. Malachy was received in Ireland with the greatest joy, and discharged his office of legate with wonderful zeal and fruit, preaching everywhere, holding synods, making excellent regulations, abolishing abuses, and working many miracles. One of these St. Charles Borromeo used to repeat to his priests, when he exhorted them not to fail being watchful and diligent in administering in due time the sacrament of extreme unction to the sick. It is related by St. Bernard as follows:3 The lady of a certain knight who dwelt near Benchor being at the article of death, St. Malachy was sent for; and after suitable exhortations he prepared himself to give her extreme unction. It seemed to all her friends better to postpone that sacrament till the next morning, when she might be better disposed to receive it. St. Malachy yielded to their earnest entreaties, though with great unwillingness. The holy man having made the sign of the cross upon the sick woman, retired to his chamber; but was disturbed in the beginning of the night with an uproar through the whole house, and lamentations and cries, that their mistress was dead. The bishop ran to her chamber, and found her departed; whereupon, lifting up his hands to heaven, he said with bitter grief and remorse: “It is I myself who have sinned by this delay, not this poor creature.” Desiring earnestly to render to the dead what he accused himself that he by his neglect had robbed her of, he continued standing over the corpse, and praying with many bitter tears and sighs; and from time to time turning towards the company, he said to them: “Watch and pray.” They passed the whole night in sighs, and reciting the psalter, and other devout prayers; when, at break of day, the deceased lady opened her eyes, sat up, and knowing St. Malachy, with devout bow saluted him: at which sight all present were exceedingly amazed, and their sadness was turned into joy. St. Malachy would anoint her without delay, knowing well that by this sacrament sins are remitted, and the body receives help as is most expedient. The lady, to the greater glory of God, recovered and lived some time to perform the penance imposed on her by St. Malachy; then relapsed, and with the usual succors of the church, happily departed.
St. Malachy built a church of stone at Benchor on a new plan, such as he had seen in other countries; at which unusual edifice the people of the country were struck with great admiration.4 He likewise rebuilt or repaired the cathedral church at Down, famous for the tomb of St. Patrick; whither also the bodies of St. Columba and St. Bridget were afterwards removed.* St. Malachy’s zeal for the re-establishment of the Irish church in its splendour moved him to meditate a second journey into France, in order to meet pope Eugenius III., who was come into that kingdom. Innocent II. died before the two palls which he had promised could be prepared and sent. Celestine II. and Lucius II. died in less than a year and a half. This affair having been so long delayed, St. Malachy convened the bishops of Ireland, and received from them a deputation to make fresh application to the apostolic see. In his journey through England, while he lodged with the holy canons at Gisburn, a woman was brought to him, who had a loathsome cancer in her breast, whom he sprinkled with water which he had blessed, and the next day she was perfectly healed. Before he reached France the pope was returned to Rome, but St. Malachy determined not to cross the Alps without first visiting his beloved Clairvaux. He arrived there in October, 1148, and was received with great joy by St. Bernard and his holy monks, in whose happy company he was soon to end his mortal pilgrimage. Having celebrated mass with his usual devotion on the feast of St. Luke, he was seized with a fever, which obliged him to take to his bed. The good monks were very active in assisting him; but he assured them that all the pains they took about him was to no purpose, because he should not recover. St. Bernard doubts not but he had a foreknowledge of the day of his departure. How sick and weak soever he was, he would needs rise and crawl down stairs into the church, that he might there receive the extreme unction and the viaticum, which he did lying on ashes strewed on the floor. He earnestly begged that all persons would continue their prayers for him after his death, promising to remember them before God; he tenderly commended also to their prayers all the souls which had been recommitted to his charge, and sweetly reposed in our Lord on All Souls’-day, the 2d of November, in the year 1148, of his age fifty-four; and was interred in the chapel of our Lady at Clairvaux, and carried to the grave on the shoulders of abbots. At his burial was present a youth, one of whose arms was struck with a dead palsy, so that it hung useless and without life by his side. Him St. Bernard called, and taking up the dead arm, applied it to the hand of the deceased saint, and it was wonderfully restored to itself, as this venerable author himself assures us.5 St. Bernard, in his second discourse on this saint, says to his monks:6 “May he protect us by his merits, whom he has instructed by his example, and confirmed by his miracles.” At his funeral, having sung a mass of requiem for his soul, he added to the mass a collect to implore the divine grace through his intercession; having been assured of his glory by a revelation at the altar, as his disciple Geoffroy relates in the fourth book of his life. St. Malachy was canonized by a bull of pope Clement, (either the third or fourth,) addressed to the general chapter of the Cistercians, in the third year of his pontificate.7
Two things, says St. Bernard,8 made Malachy a saint, perfect meekness (which is always founded in sincere profound humility) and a lively faith: by the first, he was dead to himself; by the second, his soul was closely united to God in the exercises of assiduous prayer and contemplation. He sanctified him in faith and mildness.9 It is only by the same means we can become saints. How perfectly Malachy was dead to himself, appeared by his holding the metropolitical dignity so long as it was attended with extraordinary dangers and tribulations, and by his quitting it as soon as he could enjoy it in peace: how entirely he was dead to the world, he showed by his love of sufferings and poverty, and by the state of voluntary privations and self-denial in which he lived in the midst of prosperity, being always poor to himself, and rich to the poor, as he is styled by St. Bernard. In him this father draws the true character of a good pastor, when he tells us, that self-love and the world were crucified in his heart, and that he joined the closest interior solitude with the most diligent application to all the exterior functions of his ministry. “He seemed to live wholly to himself, yet so devoted to the service of his neighbor as if he lived wholly for them.* So perfectly did neither charity withdraw him from the strictest watchfulness over himself, nor the care of his own soul hinder him in any thing from attending to the service of others. If you saw him amidst the cares and functions of his pastoral charge, you would say he was born for others, not for himself. Yet if you considered him in his retirement, or observed his constant recollection, you would think that he lived only to God and himself.”




.jpg.webp)


