I am old enough to remember the dire warnings of 'scientists' in the 1970s that there was another ice age coming. We were warned that one bad winter could tip us over the point of no return. Then, when that didn't happen, it became warnings of 'global warming'. Now, since all their predictions seem to be failing to come to pass, the hoaxsters have changed the terminology to 'man-made climate change'. Cooling, warming, who cares? As long as it gives a reason to extend State Power throughout the world.
Al Gore, who has absolutely no professional science training (he has a degree in journalism and he dropped out of law school) hopped on the bandwagon and got a Nobel Prize and an Academy Award for his documentary film An Inconvenient Truth. Of course, it has been adjudicated in Britain that it cannot be shown to school children without explaining the scientific errors in the film to them.
At least the Nobel Committee was honest enough to not give him a Science Prize. They gave him the Peace Prize, thus beginning the utter debasement of that Prize, which led to B. Hussein ibn Barack being given it for absolutely nothing except being elected POTUS.
As one examines the 'science' one realises that whether or not climate change is anthropogenic, the actual aims of the promoters of the hoax are only concerned with control, economic and political.
Here is a thread from FishEater's Forum which was begun over a decade ago. It has over 600 posts of articles, videos, etc. pointing out the flaws in the science, the proven falsification of data to advance the hoax, and other matters that weaken or destroy the whole idea. The Global Warming Fraud
From Natural News
Once upon a time in the late 1980s, the Left devised a behavioral modification scheme aimed at one thing: Future control of as much of the population as possible.
The problem was convincing enough Americans to willingly go along with the plan — a scheme most would never voluntarily agree to because it would involve radical deindustrialization and modification of their lifestyles.
They settled on human-caused “global warming” — the determination that modern existence was causing the planet to heat up so much all life would soon be exterminated…if we didn’t stop being so modern.
The crackpot theory was first introduced by NASA ‘scientist’ Dr. James Hansen in testimony before the U.S. Senate in 1988: “Global warming has begun.”
As reported June 24 of that year by The New York Times:
The earth has been warmer in the first five months of this year than in any comparable period since measurements began 130 years ago, and the higher temperatures can now be attributed to a long-expected global warming trend linked to pollution, a space agency scientist reported today.
At the time, Hansen — said to be a “leading expert on climate change” — told a Senate committee that he was “99 percent certain” that the warming trend of the day wasn’t due to natural Earth variations but instead was being “caused by a buildup of carbon dioxide and other artificial gases in the atmosphere,” the Times reported.
The Times intoned with this dire warning: “If Dr. Hansen and other scientists are correct, then humans, by burning of fossil fuels and other activities, have altered the global climate in a manner that will affect life on earth for centuries to come.”
Since then, of course, there has been no shortage of wild predictions of mass gloom, doom, and death, thanks to selfish humans (Americans mostly) who care more about their SUV than heating up the planet to the point of extinction.
And while the Left continues to tout this theory as legitimate, none of their predictions have come true. In fact, Hansen’s own charts and computer models from 1988 and earlier have been shown to be ridiculously flawed. (Related: Global warming / Climate change is dead, so when can conservatives say: “We told you so?”)
30 years of lies… and counting
Here are some of the most bizarre, insane, and just plain wrong predictions of disaster:
— One of our day’s biggest climate hoaxers, former Vice President Al Gore, predicted in 2006 as he was hyping in his BS (but nevertheless Oscar-winning) documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth,” that unless we took “drastic measures” to reduce “greenhouse gases,” then the world would reach a “point of no return” within a decade.
That prediction is now 12 years old. Mind you, Gore has never been a climate scientist or even a scientist at all; he’s just a political huckster like any other Democrat who claims to have intimate knowledge about the Earth.
— In March 2000, a writer for the UK’s Independent wrote that “snowfalls are now just a thing of the past,” as Britain was undergoing “striking environmental change” (thanks to selfish humans). But then a strange thing happened; England kept seeing snowfall. In fact, in March of this year rural UK received so much snow, one longtime resident of rural England remarked: “I’ve never seen anything like this.”
— In 2007, Australia’s The Age pondered, “Can climate change get worse? It has,” onto its way to predict “more catastrophic damages from climate change than in the worst-case scenario forecast by international experts.” That, ostensibly, included losing most of the Australian continent to flooding as melting ice dramatically increased the sea level.
There are many more, and Tony Heller of RealClimateScience.com put together a video of 30 years’ worth of bogus global warming/climate change predictions that never came true (and never will).
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.