16 January 2019

BREAKING: Cdl. Wuerl Will Not Celebrate Youth Mass Prior to March for Life

Great news! Now laicise and excommunicate him!

From LifeSiteNews

WASHINGTON, D.C., January 16, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) -- Embattled Cardinal Donald Wuerl will not celebrate the January 18 Mass for Life, which is scheduled to occur before the annual March for Life. Instead, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, apostolic nuncio to the United States, will be the principal celebrant. Also celebrating the Mass will be Auxiliary Bishops Mario Dorsonville and Roy Campbell. 
The archdiocese confirmed that Wuerl will not be the celebrate but would not elaborate as to his reasons for declining to participate, according to CNA.
The Mass for Life and Youth Rally come in the morning hours before the annual March for Life. Organized in the past by the Archdiocese of Washington, the Mass for Life has been celebrated for years by Cardinal Wuerl. 
The archdiocesan communications office did not respond to multiple emails and a telephone call by LifeSiteNews requesting comment. 
In October, Pope Francis accepted Wuerl’s resignation in the wake of reports over his connection to the sex-abuse crisis that rocked the U.S. church last summer. However, Wuerl (78) continues to administer the archdiocese as apostolic administrator until the Pope can name a successor.  
There have been increasing calls for Wuerl to step away from the Mass for Life because of his handling of abuse allegations against Archbishop Theodore McCarrick, his predecessor. Also, Wuerl has been the focus of criticism ever since the release of an August 2018 report from a Pennsylvania grand jury about his record as bishop of the Diocese of Pittsburgh and handling of abuse cases. 
A pro-life advocate in Texas told LifeSiteNews that it would be a blemish on the March for Life to have Cardinal Wuerl celebrating the Mass for youth. 
“It would communicate that some of the leaders in the church, (who are supposed to represent Jesus Christ) think that they can get away with sexual crimes against them. We faithful Catholics are saying, 'No this cannot continue to happen. These sexual crimes and cover-ups of these crimes are a huge deal.' The harm done by them are massive and have destroyed people’s lives forever. It’s time for the Church to take a stand and show respect for the victims and those faithful who remain and those who are thinking of leaving the Church because of these scandals and how they continue to get swept under the rug,” the source said. 
Having Wuerl participate would be a “horrible disrespect and slap in the face, for victims of sexual abuse. It would communicate to them that there is no justice, and the Catholic Church does not care for them, which victimizes them all over again.”
For the last 25 years, the Archdiocese of Washington has held a youth rally and mass before the March for Life. This Friday, the 2019 event will take place at the Capital One Arena, where 20,000 participants are expected. Pro-life leaders will give their testimonies, and there will also be musical performances.
Cardinal Wuerl apologized in a Jan. 15 letter for what he called a “lapse of memory” regarding what he did and didn’t know about abuse allegedly committed by former Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick, adding that he had "forgotten" about it. McCarrick stepped down from the College of Cardinals in July 2018.
Wuerl acknowledged in the letter to archdiocesan priests that he was made aware of the allegation against McCarrick after receiving a report in 2004 about a different allegation. He claimed that the "survivor also indicated that he had observed and experienced 'inappropriate conduct' by then-Bishop McCarrick."
Cardinal Wuerl said in the Jan. 15 letter that when he was bishop of Pittsburgh in 2004, a report by the Pittsburgh Diocesan Review Board informed him about a separate case and "at the conclusion of this report, the survivor indicated the 'inappropriate conduct'" he observed by McCarrick.
In the earlier Jan. 12 letter, Wuerl wrote that when "the allegation of sexual abuse of a minor was brought against Archbishop McCarrick, I stated publicly that I was never aware of any such allegation or rumors." However, Wuerl wrote that his statement was in the context of discussions about the sexual abuse of minors, not adults. 
In the Jan. 15 letter, Wuerl claimed that the Pittsburgh survivor had asked that the matter be kept confidential. Stating the he heard no more about the matter, he wrote, "I did not avert to it again," and "only afterwards was I reminded of the 14-year-old accusation of inappropriate conduct which, by that time, I had forgotten."
Abuse victim and former priest Robert Ciolek has said that he has seen evidence that Wuerl himself had forwarded Ciolek’s accusation against McCarrick to the Vatican officials in the U.S. in 2004. The Diocese of Pittsburgh issued statements last week, which admitted that Wuerl (who was bishop of Pittsburgh from 1988-2006) did, in fact, know about “inappropriate activity involving … Archbishop Theodore McCarrick.” Ciolek has accused McCarrick of misconduct during the time that Ciolek was a seminarian and priest in New Jersey during the 1980s. Ciolek has said that he wants to meet with Wuerl and urge him to tell what he knew about McCarrick.
In the Jan. 15 letter, Wuerl wrote that he apologized to this survivor of abuse "for any of the pain and suffering he endured" from the alleged abuse and “from the actions of then-Bishop McCarrick." Wuerl wrote, that "it is important for me to accept personal responsibility and apologize for this lapse of memory. There was never the intention to provide false information."

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.