From Catholic World Report
By Russell Shaw
Genuine schisms have been few and far between, and none is brewing in American Catholicism now.
A schism in American Catholicism? I think not. As a matter
of fact, I have no hesitation saying there is not now and will not be a
formal break between any significant body of American Catholics and
Pope Francis–and this despite a disturbing amount of media chatter on
the subject lately.
There are at least two large reasons why a schism won’t happen.
The first reason is that no ecclesiastical personage of
stature in American Catholicism has arisen who gives any indication of
wanting to lead a schism. And without a leader, a handful of would-be
schismatics–even supposing such to exist–has no place to go and no way
of getting there.
The second and far weightier reason is that serious
American Catholics understand very well that the Church’s unity is
willed by God. Understanding that, they further understand that
fundamental to this divinely willed unity is the communion of local
churches–their leaders and their members–with the Bishop of Rome. And
so, finally, they understand that any group or individual proposing to
disrupt this communion, even in the name of some supposedly higher
principle, could not possibly be acting according to the will of God.
Cardinal–as this is written, soon to be Saint–John Henry Newman summed it up neatly in his landmark Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine:
As the Church grew into form, so did the power of the Pope develop; and wherever the Pope has been renounced, decay and division have been the consequence. We know of no way of preserving the Sacramentum Unitatis [Sacrament of Unity–here, the Church] but a center of unity….We see before our eyes the centralizing process by which the See of St. Peter became the sovereign head of Christendom.
But supposing American Catholics can be counted on not to
go marching off into schism one of these days, where does this talk of
schism come from?
Without claiming it’s the total answer to that question, I
think it’s reasonably clear that certain people in Rome who do not know
much about the United States or American Catholicism yet mistakenly
imagine otherwise must shoulder a large part of the blame. Most likely,
they have shared their misperceptions with Pope Francis–a pope who has
had very little personal exposure to the United States–with regrettable
results.
That includes the much-publicized incident on the Holy
Father’s return flight from his visit to Africa last month when,
replying to an American reporter’s question (prompted by a French
journalist’s book) about opposition to him said to exist in the United
States, the Pope said he doesn’t fear schisms and “there has always been a schismatic option in the Church.”
Perhaps so. But the point here is that a “schismatic
option”–whatever that is–is not the same thing as a schism, and there is
no schism in America. Yes, there are people who disagree with Pope
Francis on some things (and reasoned, respectful disagreement is much
more an “option” than schism is), just as there were people who
disagreed with Pope Benedict XVI and people who disagreed with Pope St.
John Paul II and, so far as I know, people who disagreed with
all the popes before them. But genuine schisms have been few and far
between, and none is brewing in American Catholicism now.
Cardinal Newman famously remarked that “ten thousand
difficulties do not make one doubt.” To which one might add–they don’t
make one schism either. Let’s leave it at that.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.