The conclusion of the Mad Monarchist's look at what the disappearance of the Empire did to its previous lands.
From The Mad Monarchist
Concluded from Part II
And what of the two primary partners of the Dual-Monarchy? In the case
of Hungary, it is hard to imagine there being a more unjust outcome than
the peace following the Great War as it affected the Hungarians. No
other European power was as horribly butchered as Hungary who were
certainly no more guilty than any other major participant in the war.
When it was over, Hungary lost 70% of its territory and roughly a third
of its entire population to the post-war carve-up. And all of this in
spite of the fact that the Hungarian prime minister had tried to avoid
the march to war in 1914. Istvan Tisza, Prime Minister of Hungary, was
reluctant to the last to link the assassination in Bosnia with the
Serbian government, only supporting the war once the ultimatum to
Belgrade had been sent and the ties between the government and the
“Black Hand” were concretely proven. He was worried (correctly as it
turned out) that while troops were fighting the Russians and Serbs that
Romania would enter the war and attack Hungary. He also opposed the
planned-for annexation of a conquered Serbia even though this was quite
popular with many military leaders in Vienna at the time. Painted as a
villain after the war, even those who were most in agreement with the
Allies ended up suffering along with the rest.
People starved, froze and leading republican traitors in Hungary enabled
this by actually disbanding the Hungarian military. In the chaos that
followed, the communist dictator Bela Kun seized power and was only
overthrown by the humiliation of a Romanian army occupying Budapest.
Brutal civil war raged between “red” and “white” factions and while a
somewhat better state of affairs eventually prevailed the (entirely
nominal) Kingdom of Hungary was left in such a weakened state that it
had little choice but to stay on good terms with Nazi Germany, and
Hungary did briefly regain some territory in World War II but it all
ended with Hungary coming under Soviet occupation and being forced to
submit to a communist dictatorship that was a puppet-state for Moscow.
The Hungarian people were brutalized, the economy was in near absolute
ruin and they had only decades of Soviet slavery to look forward to.
Many tens of thousands of people were killed in the rebellions against
communist rule before the collapse of the USSR finally brought an end to
that era. There likely would have been even more conflicts, as seen in
other areas, but Hungary had been left in such a weakened state that
there was very little it could do as the people were brutalized by a
succession of enemies.
Finally, there is the case of Austria itself. The Austrians, deprived of
their empire, were naturally inclined, originally, to unite with
Germany simply for the sake of security and economic recovery. The
Allies refused to allow this and civil war, again, broke out between
communist and non-communist forces with real stability only being
restored by the establishment of the so-called “Austrofascist” regime of
Engelbert Dollfuss. Ignore the labels, Dollfuss was a good man and a
man who began setting the stage for the restoration of the Hapsburg
monarchy and the wider world, certainly Europe, should be more aware of
Dollfuss and inter-war Austrian history because it was the one, great
opportunity for the European community to have stopped Hitler in his
tracks. Because Dollfuss was a proud, Austrian patriot he was the number
one enemy of the Austrian Nazi Party which wanted union with the “Third
Reich” and the key moment came when the Nazis assassinated Dollfuss in
1934. Benito Mussolini, thoroughly outraged, ordered a partial
mobilization and rushed Italian troops to the border, threatening war
with Germany if Hitler took one step into Austria to take advantage of
the situation. At that stage, Italy could have potentially defeated the
Germans and Hitler backed off.
Unfortunately, the other Allied powers did nothing to support Italy
during the crisis at a time when Hitler was militarily weak and
diplomatically isolated without a single major power supporting him. But
no action was taken and what Allied unity there was soon broke up over,
of all things, Ethiopia. France and Britain imposed economic sanctions
on Italy after Mussolini went to war with Ethiopia and so the Duce
finally dropped all pretense of friendship with the Allies and accepted
the outstretched hand of Germany. That sealed the fate of Austria and
any possibility of stopping Hitler and Nazism when it would have been
the least difficult. Schuschnigg, Dollfuss’ successor, secretly agreed
to restore the monarchy within a year when Hitler decided to move
against him, having obtained the assurance of Mussolini that he would do
nothing to stop him. And it was in large part specifically to stop a
return of the House of Hapsburg that Hitler moved on Austria because he
was afraid that the restored monarchy would be a beacon for unity to
neighboring countries and that Hungary and Czechoslovakia might reunite
and therefore pose a threat to Nazi Germany (which was still far from
her full military potential).
When the Nazis occupied and annexed Austria it really was a turning
point in European history. Before that, Germany was weak and surrounded
by unfriendly powers. Afterwards, the military build-up continued, Italy
was an ally, German strength was brought to the frontiers of Yugoslavia
and Hungary, intimidating them into taking a more cooperative stance
with Germany, isolating Czechoslovakia and so on. When the Allies
finally decided to draw the line at Poland it was against a much
stronger Germany with a network of support and in support of a country
they could do nothing to directly assist. If they had earlier drawn the
line at Austria there might have been no war in Europe at all. Germany
was still weak, isolated and Austria could have been supported by the
Allies via northern Italy and Hitler would have, in all likelihood been
either contained or defeated outright and possibly overthrown by
elements inside Germany itself. Like other countries, Austria went
through civil war, foreign war, devastation and occupation which were
all directly traceable to the fall of the monarchy but, more so than in
others, the misfortune of Austria was the misfortune of Europe and much
of the world. It is no exaggeration, it is a fact backed up by the
evidence of history that the fall of the House of Hapsburg was a
disaster, both for her member states and for people all around the
world.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.