A thought provoking essay! How many of us are as dedicated to our Faith as the imam Mr Lawler met is to his?
From Catholic Culture
By Phil Lawler
Years ago, at an inter-religious conference, I was befriended by a
Muslim cleric who, when he learned that I had never met my
father-in-law, promised to do his best to bring us together. (He
fulfilled that promise, to no avail.) However, he also felt obliged to
give me a warning.
“My friend,” the imam said, “since your wife’s father is a Muslim,
she is also a Muslim, and unless she returns to the practice of Islam
she will go to hell. And because you are married to a Muslim, you also
must convert to Islam, or you too will go to hell.”
How should I have responded? At the time, I was floored by the urgent
sincerity of my new friend. He had spoken as politely as possible, and
he stressed that he did not want to offend me. And how could I take
offense? If this was what he truly believed, then it was not merely his
religious duty to speak out; it was an act of charity. He cared enough
to endanger a budding friendship, for the sake of what he believed to be
my ultimate welfare.
So I thanked the imam for his candor, and we parted ways. But I could
not help thinking, then and now, that very few Catholics would dare to
be equally candid with a friend. We have friends and acquaintances who
are living in grave sin. Do we care enough to warn them that they risk
an eternity in hell?
Now I’ll grant right away that under ordinary circumstances, telling
someone: “You’re gonna go to hell!” is not an effective form of
evangelization. But aren’t there occasions when some degree to “tough
love” is required? For myself, I know that there are times when I need
sympathy and understanding. But there are also times when I need the
spiritual equivalent of a slap upside the head. The Catholic Church in
the early 21st century seems invariably to opt for the softer approach;
it isn’t always the right one.
These thoughts crossed my mind at Mass on Sunday, as I heard the
words of St. Paul (2 Tim 1”7) that “God did not give us a spirit of
timidity but a spirit of power and love and self-control.” The spirit of
timidity counsels us to be silent. The spirit of power impels us to
speak, and the spirit of love and self-control urges us to help care for
the welfare of our neighbors more than we care for our own comfort. We
should speak—even if speaking makes us squirm a bit—if by speaking we
can move a sinner toward repentance. Yes, we should be merciful toward
others—but remember that admonishing sinners is a spiritual work of
mercy.
The spirit of timidity is subtle. Cowardice can masquerade as
subtlety, producing all sorts of reasons why it might be more wiser not
to admonish, not to speak, not to risk giving offense. And again, I
readily acknowledge that there are good, prudent, and compelling
reasons for avoiding confrontations. Pope Francis is right to decry
proselytism, if proselytism means an attempt to bludgeon people into
accepting and practicing the faith. Still, there is a balance to be
struck between aggressive proselytism on one hand, and passive
acceptance of evil on the other. If “the pastoral approach” invariably
means, in practice, doing nothing, then the “spirit of timidity” has
conquered us.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.