From The ChesterBelloc Mandate
By Delrita Joseph
The origins of Distributism and the ‘Back to the Land’ movement, are from Pope Leo XIII’s encyclical in 1891, Rerum Novarum. Pope Leo XIII advocated for the land to be shared among the different classes of people, in order to bring about equality. Furthermore, by working on the land the people will appreciate it more as they see the result of their labour which has given them their food.
The idea was taken up and developed by English Catholic Writers such as G.K. Chesterton, Hilaire Belloc and Fr Vincent McNabb OP during the 1920’s and 30’s, as an alternative to both capitalism and communism, neither of which adequately satisfied the needs of ordinary people. These writers saw capitalism as enslaving the individual and communism as tyranny. Belloc, referring to communism, said ”the remedy is worse than the disease.”
In his book, “The Outline of Sanity”, Chesterton advocates going back to being farmers by living on the land and using hand tools. He also advocated cottage industries such as weaving, blacksmithing and carpentry – occupations that facilitate craftwork and traditional skills as opposed to the repetitive, unskilled piecework which goes on in industrialised factories. Gandhi had similar ideas for developing India’s villages because he believed that industrialisation and urban life were not good for people.
The ideas of the Back to the Land Movement and Distributism were taken up in a practical way by Peter Maurin and Dorothy Day and the Catholic Worker Movement in America during the 1940’s. As well as helping the poor via soup kitchens, Catholic Workers started some small scale farming, but not on the large scale that Chesterton, Belloc and McNabb had visualised it. Both Peter Maurin and Fr McNabb liked farming and it was this that triggered off their passion for Distributism.
The ideas of Distributism and the Back to the Land Movement were discussed at a recent London Catholic Worker meeting. Although well received, the main concerns were over practicality. Some of the questions raised were: “How will it work? Land costs a lot of money” and “We are called to witness in the city where we are.”
The Green Revolution
Christians are called to bring about the Kingdom of God by being practical. Our Lord Jesus said that we must shelter the homeless, feed the hungry and clothe the naked. Traditionally, these have been done in the form of charity. Mother Theresa’s work in Calcutta is a good example of this. However, it is recognised that traditional ways of helping others can make people dependent. As an alternative, the ideas of Back to the Land Movement and Distributism are dynamic and comprehensive, in that they offer the possibilities of independence and of learning how to provide for ourselves. Other modern issues such as ecology and the environment are also related to what Peter Maurin called ’The Green Revolution’.
Appropriate Technology
The Back to the Land Movement/Distributism is a credible, practical, alternative to globalisation as high tech industrialisation, particularly among western nations, which uses so much of the world’s resources and are its biggest polluter. Industrialisation also reduces individuals to becoming, “a cog in a machine”. Films such as the Terminator and the Matrix show us a possible future in which we are going to be controlled by mechanical gadgets, machines and faceless authorities who do not value our humanness and view human beings as dispensable items, whom they would rather do without. Adolph Huxley’s book “Brave New World” is a another good example of this. More recent writers such as Ivan Illich also warn of this danger.
A Decentralised Economy
In order to want to change things, you have to be unhappy about the way that things are at present and to rebel against it. Distributism has a vision of a world where we will work with the use of tools instead of machines - we will work on the land instead of concrete and glass cities - we will have small cottage industries instead of factories and large scale industrialisation - we will work with autonomy instead of doing boring repetitive piece work which produces alienation and dissatisfaction - we will live in cottages instead of blocks of flats - we will look after the earth, treat it with respect and preserve its ecology instead of plundering its resources -we will have Community instead of individualism - we will bring each other joy instead of competition and rivalry.
This list could be much longer. Our Lord Jesus told us that we are light in this world. That means we have to take the lead in guiding those who are in darkness. It is said of the early Christians, that they turned the world upside down. (Acts 17v6). We all have to find our way of bringing about the Kingdom of God. Our Lord told us that the Kingdom of God will be taken by force and forceful people will lay hold of it. (Matthew 11v12).
The ideas of Back to the Land Movement/Distributism are an alternative to capitalism and communism. It does not claim to be a perfect solution, but it is there to be tried. Peter Maurin quotes Chesterton as saying, “The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult and left untried”. Then Maurin explains, “Christianity has not been tried because people thought it was impractical. And humans have tried everything except Christianity. And everything that humans have tried has failed.” Back to the Land Distributism is an idea worth trying.
London Catholic Worker
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.