Just like the modernists of old, they went underground when they were condemned. Now they've come back to gloat at their victory over Catholicism!
From the National Catholic Register
By Edward Pentin
Forty synod fathers met Sunday to celebrate Mass in the same catacombs
in Rome and to sign a new pact advancing some of the same principles.
ROME — For supporters of the 1965 “Catacombs’ Pact of the Poor and
Servant Church,” the pact had the noble aim of bringing the Church
closer to the poor and back to the early Church; for its critics, it had
an odor of Marxism and Protestant egalitarianism that helped pave the
way for “liberation theology.”
Signed in the Catacombs of Domitilla just after the end of the Second
Vatican Council, 42 Council Fathers asked God for the grace to be
“faithful to the spirit of Jesus” in the service of the poor.
The signatories, which later numbered 500 Council Fathers, vowed to
enact a preferential option for the poor, renouncing personal
possessions, ornate vestments and “names and titles that express
prominence and power.”
They also made an oath to “be animators according to the Spirit
rather than dominators according to the world,” to make themselves “as
humanly present and welcoming as possible” and open to all, “no matter
what their beliefs.”
It was for them a pact that would help return the institutional Church back to the early Church.
Archbishop Helder Câmara of Recife, Brazil, was credited with taking
the lead role in organizing the original Catacombs Pact. In the
subsequent post-conciliar years, Archbishop Câmara became known as “the
Red Bishop,” courtesy of his prominence as one of the leading proponents of Latin American liberation theology.
On Sunday, about 40 synod fathers taking part in the Pan-Amazon synod
took part in a Mass in the same catacombs to renew the spirit of the
pact and to sign a new one entitled
“Pact of the Catacombs for the Common Home: For a Church With an
Amazonian Face, Poor and Servant, Prophetic and Samaritan.”
New Pact’s Action Points
The new pact paid tribute to the “martyrs that were the members of
the base ecclesial communities” and others who “shed their blood for
this option for the poor, for defending life and fighting for the
protection of our Common Home.”
Among its 15 action points were to “defend the Amazon jungle” in the
face of climate change; to commit to an “integral ecology”; and to renew
the Church’s preferential option of the poor, helping native peoples to
preserve their “lands, languages, stories, identities and
spiritualties.”
There was no criticism of pagan traditions or spiritualties; rather,
they rejected “all types of colonist mentality and posture” and instead
called on parishes and dioceses to “welcome and value cultural ethnic
and linguistic diversity in a respectful dialogue with all spiritual
traditions.”
Further points included denouncing “all forms of violence and
aggression” toward native peoples, their identity and territories,
“announcing the liberating novelty of the Gospel,” and urging the Church
to “walk ecumenically” with other Christian communities.
The call for establishing a “synodal lifestyle” was also proposed, as
was the urge to “consolidate” an “adequate ministry of women leaders of
the community,” and “new paths” of pastoral action where lay
contributions are prominent in attention to those on the peripheries as
well as “migrants, workers and the unemployed.”
The new pact also urged a “happily sober lifestyle” in the face of
“the avalanche of consumerism,” the reduction of use of plastics, the
promotion of “agro-ecological products,” and being on the side of those
persecuted for “denouncing and repaying injustices” and who defend “the
earth and the rights of the poor.”
The oath closed by recalling words from Pope Francis encyclical Laudato Si
(Care for Our Common Home), in which he wrote the Eucharist of the
Covenant is “an act of cosmic love” that joins heaven and earth and
“embraces and penetrates all creation.” In the bread of the Eucharist,
he wrote, “creation is projected towards divinization” and is a “source
of light and motivation for our concerns for the environment, directing
us to be stewards of all creation.”
Participants’ Perspectives
Brazilian Cardinal Claudio Hummes, the synod’s relator general,
celebrated the Mass, which was attended by about 250 faithful, including
other synod participants, representatives of REPAM, the body running
the Oct. 6-27 meeting, religious and local faithful.
In his homily, Cardinal Hummes said the location was a reminder of
the “difficult times” of the early Church, marked by persecution. The
Church, he added, “must always return to its roots here and in
Jerusalem.”
Turning to the synod, he said it is a “fruit of the Second Vatican
Council” and that “new ways are being sought to carry out the mission of
proclaiming the word.” The great evils of the world are due to the
money that feeds corruption, conflict and lies, and so the Church must
always be “praying.”
Concelebrating the Mass were key figures of the synod, including
Bishop Erwin Kräutler, one of the main authors of the synod’s
controversial working document, and Jesuit Cardinal Pedro
Ricardo Barreto, vice president of REPAM. Archbishop Rino Fisichella,
president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting the New
Evangelization, was also present, although he did not concelebrate but
stood at the back of the church.
Cardinal Berreto told the Register after the Mass that the new pact
was meant as a “renewal” of the Church and the teachings of the Second
Vatican Council, but he firmly rejected it was meant to signify any
renewal of liberation theology.
Archbishop Fisichella said the renewal of the pact was “a beautiful
sign” and also said it was not meant as a kind of resuscitation of
liberation theology. “It is in continuity with what happened just after
Vatican II,” and the original pact proposed a “deep engagement with the
poor.”
He said the emphasis on the environment in the new pact was a “consequence of Laudato Si.” The engagement at this moment is with both “the poor and creation,” he added.
On whether people should be concerned about the new pact, given the
criticism of what the earlier one led to, Archbishop Fisichella said:
“No, this is something new — read the text, this is something very
important, because in some ways this is a fruit of the synod.”
Franciscan Sister Sheila Kinsey, executive pro-secretary of the
justice, peace and integrity of creation commission of the Union of
Superior Generals (USG) and International Union of Superior Generals
(UISG), told the Register that, for her, the priority for the Amazon was
ensuring that indigenous people have the benefits of their resources,
especially in mining communities.
On criticism that the synod has, for some, seemed to be more about
politics and social justice than worship, faith and salvation of souls,
Sister Sheila said it is important, “through faith, to find ways to work
together.”
This is how those against the faith “destroy: They politicize issues
that are really of our faith, and we get caught up in that,” said Sister
Sheila, who is not taking part in the synod. “That’s how they co-opt
our message — the two extremes, both on the left and on the right, on
both sides.”
The answer, she said, was “to be clear: It’s about caring for each
other and how we can do that” and putting “Christ at the center.”
It is about “bringing Christ’s presence to one another, the presence
of Jesus who is within our hearts,” Sister Sheila said. “The presence of
Christ whom we receive in the Eucharist needs to be our life, the
center of our lives.”
Edward Pentin is the Register’s Rome correspondent
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Leo XIV as the Vicar of Christ, the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.