From Everyday For Life Canada
Netflix has just released the movie "Cuties." It's anything but cute. The movie peddles the sexualization of children. But don't expect those that produced it to admit that. They argue that it's message is needed social commentary. It's not.
Maimouna Doucoure the film's director is a feminist and says that social media isn't friendly to teenagers. In a short video, she argues that teenagers are pushed into having an "ideal body" and a certain "fashion" that they are pressured to adopt. We live in a very sexualized society.
So, her answer to the problem is to make a movie where the main character Amy and the rest of the main cast are hyper-sexualized teenagers. Doucoure does the opposite of what one would expect. By explicitly depicting the problem she claims to want to solve, she ends up abusing children by sexaulizing them. There is no need to further abuse pre-pubescent child actors in order to communicate the idea that children today are sexually exploited. The children in the film twerking as the camera captures their sexually suggestive moves totally contradicts what the director says she's addressing. The movie, instead, celebrates the sexual exploitation of children.
If the director believes that young girls are being sexually abused in the real world in order to be recognized and valued for who they are, then why have children cast in these sexually dangerous and sexually suggestive roles? Children are human beings, not objects to be used like any other commodity. This movie is wrong on so many levels. The story undermines the very message the director claims to be filming. We believe that the adults making the movie knew what they're doing from the beginning: "Cuties" pushes to normalize the sexualizing of children, and then what's the next step, child pornography and the de-stigmatizing of paedophilia? Activists are already advancing the notion that society no longer use the word paedophilia, and replace it with the positive sounding acronym MAP, minor attracted persons. Look at how the new term "gender dysphoria" has helped to change societal views about homosexuality.
"Cuties" has nothing to do with art or having a theme to help children and teenagers growing up in an overly sexualized society. Parents don't let your children see this movie. Complain to Netflix for releasing this teen abusive sexual propaganda. Parents should keep in mind that children also face in schools radical comprehensive sex-"education" programs. The explicit school sex-curricula have been implemented by governments and pushed by the United Nations and the WHO. If one connects the dots, universal explicit sex-"education" is how we end up with movies such as "Cuties" that present a danger to children's safety and well being. Have we forgotten that Ontario's former deputy director of education Benjamin Levin was found guilty of three child pornography charges. And he was the man who helped to develop the now implemented radical 2015 sex-curriculum in both public and Catholic schools. Parents should never forget this fact. "Cuties" is sadly a child of our very sick and sexualized culture.
Reed Hastings the CEO of Netflix should be ashamed for helping to spread for profits the sexual corruption of children as entertainment for any age. Here's a company worth some 223 billion on the stock market and offers the culture this artistic corruption. And don't look for any criticism coming from the Democratic left about this movie because Netflix is a big contributor to the party. Parents beware!
Here's Matt Walsh from the Daily Wire reviewing the film's content.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.