From Southern Orders
Paul VI, asked by his philosopher friend Jean Guitton why he would not concede the 1962 missal to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and his followers who rejected the liturgical reform:
Poor Blessed Paul VI! His Holiness was so horribly wrong about the symbol that would shake the entire Second Vatican Council as well as what would shake the apostolic authority of the Council.Never. This Mass … becomes the symbol of the condemnation of the council. I will not accept, under any circumstances, the condemnation of the council through a symbol. Should this exception to the liturgy of Vatican II have its way, the entire council would be shaken. And, as a consequence, the apostolic authority of the council would be shaken.
What in fact has done this? An inept, arrogant and corrupt hierarchy that has led the Church and her doctrinal and moral authority to a catastrophe.
Fixing that which wasn’t broken and replacing the authentic worship of Jesus Christ with worshiping a pastoral ecumenical council did all and more than Paul VI ever thought would shake the authority of a council, it shakes the authority of the Church in general and shakes the personal faith of countless numbers of Catholics.
The 1962 Missal could not and never could do that!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.