Thursday, 19 October 2017

Thoughts on Dr Kirk and the Constitution

My current political reading is 'The Conservative Mind, From Burke to Eliot', by Russell Kirk, and 'The Portable Conservative Reader', also edited by Dr Kirk.Today, 19 October, would have been his 99th birthday.

He died in 1994 at the age 75. As I read the pæans he heaped upon the US Constitution as a 'conservative document', I wonder if he would write the same words today? He, of course, saw the murder of the unborn declared 'constitutional', but what would he think of the moral cesspit that is now considered acceptable under that 'conservative document'? In his discussion of Samuel Taylor Coleridge in 'The Conservative Mind' he says, 'Conservation of our moral order must be paralleled by conservation of our political order. The Church (of which Christianity, "a fortunate accident," is one form, but is not identical with the Idea of a Church itself) lives not merely in partnership with the State, but with it constitutes a unity. Upon considerations of expediency and convenience, we may separate the actual operation of government and of churchly authority; but at bottom, Church and State are forever united. Society cannot subsist unless both of its constituent elements thrive.'

Kirk, Russell. The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot (Kindle Locations 2379-2384). David Rehak. Kindle Edition.


Given the unceasing attacks on 'the Church', i.e. basically all forms of organised Christianity, which are consistently upheld by the Courts under that Constitution I wonder if he were yet alive, would he still consider it to be a 'conservative document'?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.