From Catholic Culture
By Phil Lawler
When the pandemic crisis eases, and the world heads back into its normal routines, Catholic bishops will have some explaining to do.
Why did you forbid the administration of the sacraments? For
reasons of public health— and in many cases, because of emergency government regulations— you were forced to curtail public ceremonies. But were you forced to issue a blanket prohibition? Weren’t there ways to allow some acts of public worship, with appropriate safeguards? Did you explore those possibilities thoroughly?
Just a few months ago, at the Amazon Synod, we heard pleas for the ordination of married men, based on the argument that the faithful must have access to the sacraments.
Why wasn’t the same imperative felt during the pandemic: the need to take special measures to ensure that the sacraments were available?
If the precepts of the Church are important, why didn’t you address them in your public statements? Catholics are under a solemn obligation to attend Mass on Sunday. When you made it impossible to fulfill that norm, did you assure the faithful that they were dispensed? A diocesan bishop has the authority to allow for general absolution. When you forbade sacramental confessions, did you encourage your priests to offer general absolution?
How will you coax the people back into the pews? For weeks, Church leaders have been encouraging the laity not to worry about missing Mass, since we can watch a livestream private Mass from the comfort of their homes. They have urged lay people not to worry about the lack of opportunity for confession, because we can always make a perfect act of contrition. They have been reminding the people that it is always possible to pray alone, or with the family, in the home. What will you say now, if many Catholics conclude that it must not be terribly important to come to Sunday Mass, to make a sacramental confession, to receive the sacraments?
Did you show your loving care for your people? Did you make yourself visible to ordinary Catholics? Did you lead and/or encourage Eucharistic processions? Did you issue statements of reassurance? Did you visit the sick?
The decision to shut down churches must have been agonizing; did you convey your regret in your announcements? Did your public statements have the tone of messages from a loving father rather than a bureaucratic administrator? Did you let people know that you understood their thirst for the sacraments? Did you express sympathy for priests who tried to find creative ways to continue their sacramental ministry, or did you treat them as potential rebels?
Did you bow to public pressure? If you closed churches and barred the administration of the sacraments, did you do so completely on your own, motivated by concern for your people? Or were you fearful of adverse public comment if church services continued? Did you feel pressure from the government? If so, would you ever resist that pressure?
Did you unnecessarily prohibit baptisms and weddings? In America today, a wedding almost invariably means a large public celebration. Baptisms, too, have become crowded affairs— especially in churches were the sacrament is only administered occasionally, so that many infants are baptized at the same ceremony. But from the perspective of the Church these sacraments require the presence of only a handful of people. Did you allow for “minimalist” celebrations? Did you remind the faithful that in an emergency they have the authority to baptize? And we were in an emergency, weren’t we? Otherwise your restrictive orders were unjustifiable.
Will you reopen the churches as soon as possible? All of them? If government directives point to a gradual easing of restrictions, how will you respond? Will you take every opportunity to resume the normal sacramental life in parishes?
You will probably be facing a financial crisis, having missed all those weekly collections. Will you address the deficit by closing parishes, or will you look for ways to trim the chancery staff? Which is more important to you? Which is more important to the lay faithful?
These are all very important questions that need answers. I'm sure all Catholics have been trying to determine those answers but have not been able to. Most problems with social distancing could have been addressed by simply authorising priests to celebrate more Masses on a daily basis to cater for the usual numbers & to assign more time to hearing confessions, especially at this time of year when it is compulsory to make a good confession & attend the Easter commemorations. Provision of the Last Rites should never be denied, nor should baptism - the springboard of our faith.
ReplyDeleteMr. Lawler should email these questions to the Vatican & its episcopes in order to obtain an early response . They still have four days before Easter Sunday to lift them.