'What Did This Commenter Mean by 'On what do you base your accusations against Pope Francis?'

Someone recently anonymously commented on my post The Grand Old British Empire as follows:

Excellent points on the British Empire!
On what do you base your accusations against Pope Francis?

Whilst I appreciate the compliment to the Mad Monarchist, I have to wonder exactly what the commenter meant by his question.  I can only assume that the only thing he has ever read on this blog is that single post and he noticed the rules of my combox, which include, 'Comments will be deleted that are attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.)'

I also can only assume that he has never read any honest Catholic media in the past seven years, limiting his knowledge of Francis's Papacy  to only the fawning of lickspittle toadies like Austen Ivereigh, 'Beans' Faggioli, Tommy Rosica, and Antonio Spadaro.

If he wants to know on what I base my accusations of Francis, I would suggest searching this blog for 'Francis', or reading LifeSiteNews, The Lepanto Institute, Church Militant, One Peter Five, or any of the dozens of other news sites and blogs that are not controlled by the hierarchy and can tell the truth without fear of reprisal. That's why both Rosica and Bishop Barron want to institute an Index Websitorum Prohibitorum, to stop the truth from coming out!