A great enemy of the Faith, but one of the Great Captains of History!
From The Mad Monarchist (6 November 2011)
It
is appropriate today to take a look at the late, great Swedish monarch
Gustavus Adolphus (officially King Gustav II Adolf). In Sweden, he is a
giant historical figure, a dynamic warrior king who presided over a
Kingdom of Sweden that became the regional super-power of Scandinavia.
In European terms he was a pivotal historical figure as the Protestant
champion of the Thirty Years War without whom the Catholic Holy Roman
Empire might have been resurgent as the dominant power on the continent.
Even in world history Gustavus Adolphus is known across the globe by
military historians as one of the great captains of all time. He built
and led the most advanced and formidable army of his time and has since
been dubbed by many the “Father of Modern Warfare” because of his
innovative organization of military logistics and his revolutionary
integration of infantry, cavalry and artillery as a mutually supportive
combined force on the battlefield. All of the great military geniuses of
modern times, particularly Marlborough and through him Napoleon,
continuing down to the present owe a reverent salute to King Gustavus
Adolphus.
Gustavus
Adolphus was born in Stockholm on December 9, 1594, eldest son and heir
of Duke Charles of the Swedish Royal House of Vasa and Christina of
Holstein-Gottorp during the reign of his cousin King Sigismund III.
Europe was in the grip of religious upheaval and King Sigismund III, a
Catholic, was deposed in 1599 by Duke Charles who became regent and
finally King Charles IX in 1604, making Prince Gustavus Adolphus heir to
the Swedish throne. He was only seventeen when his father died in 1611
and Gustavus Adolphus was thrust upon the throne of Sweden with his
cousin Sigismund III still trying to regain his crown (who was also King
of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth). In 1626, in response to this
and to recover Baltic territories Sigismund had transferred from Sweden
to Poland, the young King Gustavus Adolphus launched a war against
Poland for control of the Baltic. It was a long and frustrating
conflict, but Gustavus Adolphus was victorious, his throne secure and
while he did not quite make the Baltic a Swedish lake as he had hoped,
he had certainly made Sweden the dominant power in the Baltic Sea.
King Charles IX had trained his son almost from birth to be the best
king possible. Part of this was political training but a large part was
also military training and Gustavus Adolphus excelled at it. Even as a
teenager he led Swedish troops in repelling a Danish attack in East
Gotland. As King of Sweden he proved to be a man of great courage,
creative thinking, grand ambitions and disciplined determination. If he
was better at war than government he at least had the self-awareness to
realize it and, as any good King should do, appointed an eminently
qualified statesman to oversee administration while he focused on the
military. This man was Axel Oxenstierna who the King made his chancellor
and together they proved a winning team in the political arena and on
the battlefield. By the time the Thirty Years War broke out in Central
Europe, Gustavus Adolphus was already known as the “Lion of the North”
for his great victories in Latvia and around the Baltic. He was
impressive enough to catch the attention of the French Cardinal
Richelieu, the power-behind-the-throne in the Kingdom of France.
Cardinal Richelieu considered the Swedish warrior king his great “find”
and helped fund his entry into the Thirty Years War.
Although
classified as a religious war (and one of the worst), the Thirty Years
War was obviously not strictly so. The “Protestant side” included many
Catholic soldiers and there were many Protestant forces fighting on the
“Catholic side”. Although Cardinal Richelieu and the rest of France were
devoutly Catholic, they supported the Protestant Kingdom of Sweden as a
way to prevent their Catholic rival, the House of Hapsburg which ruled
the Holy Roman Empire, from becoming too powerful. As far as Gustavus
Adolphus was concerned, he had defeated the Danes, the Poles and even
the Russians in battle so the mercenary armies of the Holy Roman Empire
held no terror for him. He was a staunch Lutheran of course and he was
also concerned for the safety of his country. So far, the Protestant
forces had, frankly, been getting their clocks cleaned by some extremely
capable Catholic Imperial commanders. If the Catholics continued to
drive northward the Holy Roman Empire might decide to conquer
Scandinavia as well. The decision to intervene was made.
With a formidable reputation and self-confidence born out of experience,
King Gustavus Adolphus marched into Germany at the head of what was
almost certainly, man for man, the best army of the early 17th Century.
Although small, they were better organized than any other force in
Europe. King Gustavus Adolphus was the first commander since practically
Imperial Rome to organize his men into permanent military units and he
established a permanent chain of command, with special officers in
charge of special jobs. He also integrated his armed forces and no one
else had done. Instead of leading a mob of hired men, the King of Sweden
led an army based on teamwork. Infantry, cavalry and artillery would
all work in conjunction in a way no one at the time had ever seen
before. He also, very critically, established a modern and organized
system of logistics with a chain of supply bases to keep his troops fed
and equipped consistently while on campaign. Under his command the
Swedish army was truly an elite force and King Gustavus Adolphus
demanded discipline and good character from his men. They could not
loot, fornicate, get drunk, utter blasphemy or swear under pain of
severe punishment. Being morally upright was just as important to him as
being brave and obedient and was part of his overall vision of building
the best army possible and that he certainly did.
It
all paid off. As soon as he landed his forces he won a quick victory on
the edge of the Baltic before moving inland where he confronted and
defeated the Imperial commander Johann Tserclaes Graf von Tilly, one of
the two most capable and victorious Catholic generals of the war.
Gustavus Adolphus used innovative tactics no one at the time was
prepared for, spreading his men out rather than packing them together in
tight formations, having smaller units that could deploy and maneuver
faster than anyone else and highly mobile artillery that could be
re-positioned as circumstances required. He was everywhere victorious
and the tide of war turned in favor of the Protestants and the Swedish
army pushed farther and farther south. They spent the winter in the
Rhineland and the following spring, in 1632, met Graf von Tilly in
battle again in Bavaria. Once again the “Lion of the North” was
victorious and in that battle the great Graf von Tilly was killed, a
terrible blow to the Imperial forces. Desperate to stop the Swedish
juggernaut the Emperor called upon a man he did not entirely trust but
the only military commander of such reputation as to be capable of
defeating Gustavus Adolphus; Albrecht Wenzel von Wallenstein, the
conqueror of Silesia and the man whose victories against the Danes had
been partly responsible for bringing an alarmed Sweden into the war in
the first place.
The result was the battle of Lützen on November 6, 1632 (by the
Protestant calendar), an epic showdown between the best Catholic and
Protestant commanders in Europe. At first it seemed that in Wallenstein,
Gustavus Adolphus had met his match. He got the jump on the Swedes as
they moved to attack him, yet, in the initial assault on his lines, the
Swedish forces made serious headway before the timely arrival of
reinforcements set them back a bit. Rallying his men, the ever bold
Gustavus Adolphus led a cavalry charge himself against the imperial
lines, in a thick fog, in which the courageous monarch was shot down,
still fairly early in the course of battle. At almost any other time,
with any other army, this would have been the end of the Swedes. Any
other army would have been disheartened, demoralized and their final
defeat a forgone conclusion. This was not, however, the case with the
Swedish army and it was thanks to all of the care the late King had
taken to ensure a disciplined, devoted and determined army. They were
not demoralized by the death of their monarch, they were enraged. The
redoubled their efforts, steeled themselves for the fight and threw
themselves back into the battle with a fury to avenge their fallen
sovereign. The tide turned again and the Imperial army was soundly
defeated. The King was dead but the great Wallenstein had been beaten.
Wallenstein
retreated from Saxony to Bohemia while the Swedes carried their King
home, his death ending the hopes of a total Protestant conquest of
Germany. In Sweden the date of the King’s death became a holiday, still
commemorated to this day (even after the change in calendars). His young
daughter was placed on the throne as Queen Christina (or King as she
had been raised as a boy) and the widowed Queen, Maria Eleanor of
Brandenburg who the King had married in 1620, went mad with grief after
the death of her husband. His death was a tragedy and helped ensure the
Thirty Years War would end in stalemate rather than outright victory for
one side or the other. Yet, he left a larger and more powerful kingdom
than he had inherited. He laid the foundation for the “Swedish Empire”
and had made Sweden the dominant power of Northern Europe. Gustavus
Adolphus had united his people, instilled in them a righteous national
pride and he had revolutionized the art of war for all time since. He
was, by every measure, one of the great men of history.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.