From Quora
I recognise that you very rudely and ignorantly omit His Majesty’s title in phrasing your question.
First, there is no Princess Meghan.
Second, although sacramental, a coronation is not a marriage so objections are neither invited nor sustainable (all due process is complete before the procalamation - remember that?)
In summation, had Prince Harry and his wife legitimate grounds to object to King Charles III’s succession, then those grounds should have been put before the accession council immediately. It can hardly be claimed that Harry didn’t know this, he was feebly twittering about flying to Balmoral only the day before; is aPrince of the Blood and has a wife who complains at the drop of a hat.
Since the proclamation of our King went ahead, we may safely assume that since the succession process is complete, there remains no sustainable objection.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.