26 April 2022

What Will Happen if Roe vs Wade Is Overturned?, by Jack Seney

I shared my rather depressing conclusions on this question in October 2020 in my post 'Unpopular Opinion-What Would Really Happen If Roe vs Wade Were Overturned?'

By Jack Seney 

So, will the supposedly imminent overturning of "Roe v. Wade" at the U.S. Supreme Court mean the "victory" that many pro-life Americans are swooning over in advance?
Or would this mean that some states will adopt different kinds of supposed pro-life protections (including ones that allow the killing of babies for a "more limited" time), while others become even more pro-abort and even invite women from other states to visit them and kill their babies?
I think it is obvious that the second case is at hand, and how that is something to celebrate is beyond me.
I pray that babies' lives might somehow be saved by this scenario. But I would be a phony if I pretended that there are no obvious problems with it. In fact, there are debilitating problems with it.
In one of the earliest examples of what is to come, we have seen one governor named De Santis in Florida sign state legislation to "limit abortion" there. Professional pro-lifers have been crying "Hallelujah!" and falling all over each other rushing to Florida for photo ops with De Santis. Never mind that this "pro-life" legislation allows abortion to continue for almost four months after pregnancy! No, God is supposed to be grateful to us for pretending to allow a reprieve after 50 years of the satanic killing of babies.
Guess when the vast majority of abortion murders take place? Within the first three months of pregnancy. De Santis has even tacked on an extra three weeks more than usual to kill babies under his "pro-life" legislation. And for this Father Pavone, Abby Johnson and company jump up and down in glee about how wonderful the Republican party is.
"Well, what do you propose, damn you?!" some angry Fox News "pro-lifers" will scream at me.
I propose saving one baby at a time directly instead of relying on politicians to do it for us indirectly with their dubious "laws." My friend Vince and his wife once attended a pro-life rally outside an abortuary here in Queens, a rally which included Bishop Dimarzio. Two young people there repented in tears from being about to go inside the abortuary and murder their baby. That is a real result featuring real people and a real baby whose life was really saved. Whatever De Santis is claiming about lives that might be saved in Florida, he has hurriedly made sure that countless other lives will be taken during that near four-month period which he has enshrined for abortion murder. "Thanks" oh so much, De Santis.
Now the state of Missouri, which appears to have no remaining operative abortuaries within its borders, cleansed itself with the "help" of no noticeable politician. They simply made it very clear to abortionists that their presence was not welcome, provided them with little business, choked their ability to make a murderous profit and sent them packing. State officials who pursued violations against abortuaries acted at the behest of a strongly pro-life public. If this can be done once, it can be done 49 more times to clean out America of abortuaries, and the government and lying politicians do not have to have much to do with it at all.
Let us then be thankful for the actual victories that exist, and may God have mercy on us for putting up with the slaughter of tens of millions of innocents for as long as we have.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.