The Mad Monarchist takes a quick look at some of the Kings of Spain.
From The Mad Monarchist (7 August 2013)
House of Hapsburg
King Carlos I: Better known as Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor of
the German nation and all that, Carlos I was a great King of Spain but,
more to the point, was a great monarch in general as he had more than
one throne and a great many responsibilities far beyond the Spanish
lands. For Catholic Christendom, Carlos I was like Atlas; holding up the
world on his own. He was altogether an awesome figure. He was
courageous, a very skilled warrior, an intelligent and thoughtful man, a
cosmopolitan man, a cultured man, a pious son of the Church, a shrewd
statesman and a leader willing to take risks. Sometimes that meant doing
what had to be done even if it was rather unsavory. The foundations for
the great Spanish colonial empire were set down during his reign in
Mexico and other areas and his was the first empire upon which, it was
said, ‘the sun never set’. The only thing I can fault him for was the
war against Pope Clement VII, the invasion of Italy and the utterly
horrific sack of Rome. He did not order the atrocity of course, but he
ordered the invasion and, as monarch, was ultimately responsible. He was
horrified by it, but not too horrified to take advantage of the
situation. Still, that aside, his was an epic reign spent in a titanic
struggle against enemies on all sides and he usually won. The first
monarch to rule all of modern Spain himself, he was one of the greatest
of all time.
King Felipe II: One of my favorites, Felipe II had all the
courage and determination of his father but even stronger principles. He
did not always enjoy the same level of success though his only really
major defeat (the “Invincible Armada”) was due more to plain bad luck
and the skill of his opponents rather than his own mistakes (though he
did make some). Felipe II was an extremely religious man, which today
tends to be viewed as a bad thing but it wasn’t of course and he was
certainly not the callous villain he is often portrayed as. In fact, he
was a very compassionate man, very sensitive and considerate. He saved
Malta from the Turks, beat the French at San Quentin, very nearly
suppressed the Dutch rebellion but at least held on to Belgium and his
forces played the largest part in the defeat of a massive Turkish
invasion at Lepanto. The Armada was a fiasco and he did make some
mistakes in organizing that endeavor. However, that was one defeat in an
otherwise extremely successful reign and his character more than makes
up for it. The colonial empire was further expanded and consolidated,
religious uniformity was enforced (sparing Spain the civil wars France
and Germany would have) and, in many ways, Spanish power reached its
zenith under Felipe II. I would even go so far as to say that, in my
opinion, he is probably the greatest monarch Spain has ever had.
King Felipe III: It is rather unfortunate that Felipe III seemed
to inherit his great piety from his father but little else and his reign
is usually identified as the period when the economic rot set in that
was to prove so damaging to the Spanish empire. It is hard to be too
critical of Felipe III though because he was such a good man, very
religious, very devoted to his wife and who wanted to do the right
thing. But, for all of his excellent qualities he simply lacked the firm
will to rise above the factions at court and lead Spain in the
direction he desired. He could be called a victim of being humble to the
point of hesitancy. While he prayed other men stepped in and took
control of the Spanish government and, unfortunately, they were more
concerned with enriching themselves than strengthening and glorifying
the Spanish nation. For good or ill he took Spain into the Thirty Years
War and Spanish troops under the Count of Tilly had some success before
Felipe III died. His reign was not the total disaster most think but he
was not as effective as he should have been and it was, on the whole, an
opportunity lost.
King Felipe IV: Fortunately, Spanish fortunes improved under
Felipe IV. In fact, the Spanish empire reached its peak under Felipe IV
in terms of sheer size. Felipe IV was a man of very noble intentions who
really tried to be another Felipe II, a Spanish champion of Catholicism
in Europe, and it is admirable that he had a very serious
correspondence with the mystic Venerable Mary of Agreda who advised him
on how to be a true Christian monarch. The trouble was that he would
throw himself into his work so much and try so hard that he would
quickly burn himself out and would then revert to being an often absent
monarch, leaving affairs in the hands of his chief minister. The man was
always hot or cold, he had only two speeds. He was a great patron of
the arts and left behind a great cultural legacy, his troops won a
number of very solid victories and he left Spain a more beautiful,
larger and more respected country than he found it. Still, he seems to
be often unfairly criticized for not being perfect, even though others
who are praised even more suffered greater setbacks than he did -as any
ruler invariably will. The biggest lingering problem of his reign was
the economy, which was stretched to the breaking point and kept going
only by gold and silver imports from America. However, those problems
started before his reign and it would have been a tall order for any
monarch to reverse such a long-standing trend in one lifetime. Overall,
there is more justification than not for his being known as “Philip the
Great”.
King Carlos II: Oh the pity. The great, great pity. The Hapsburg
reign came to an end with Carlos II and most know that things did not go
well for Spain with King Carlos II and most, I am sure, know why. He
was certainly not to blame but his bloodline certainly was. Felipe II
and Felipe IV had both married nieces, other marriages had overlapping
family trees and the result was the unfortunate, pitiable state of
Carlos II. The overuse of family intermarriage for political reasons
caused him to be born extremely disabled, both mentally and physically.
His lower jaw extended so far that he was unable to chew his food (hence
the term “Hapsburg jaw”) or even close his mouth. His tongue was so
large his speech was barely intelligible and he was constantly sick with
various ailments, having an extremely weak immune system. He could
barely walk, suffered losses of memory, had epileptic fits and virtually
none of his organs or systems functioned properly. He was married (duty
first after all) but was, not surprisingly, unable to consummate the
marriage and his very depressed wife died young, leaving him heartbroken
on top of his many other maladies. Spain declined considerably under
his reign, which was the fault of the inept and/or corrupt political
figures who held power in his name rather than the monarch himself.
Really one can only feel great sorrow and pity for Carlos II. When he
finally died the only surprise was that he had somehow lived so long (38
years).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.