An excellent essay by a well-known Catholic philosopher. She points out that once one accepts artificial contraception, one hasn't a moral leg to stand on in opposing abortion, euthanasia, and homosexual 'marriage'. She doesn't actually mention the last by name, of course. She only discusses homosexual 'activity'. This essay was written in 1972, when no sane man or woman could even entertain the thought that within 30 years there would be a movement to 'legalise' this perversion of God's Law and of the natural law.
Roman Catholic thinker Elizabeth Anscombe reflects on the theological implications of contraception and chastity. Writing as a Roman Catholic, Anscombe offers a penetrating moral analysis of marriage and sexuality that will benefit any reader who rejects the secularist reduction of marriage as merely a union that sanctions sexual activity between partners. (Text is 16 pages. You might want to print it.)
Because it is so lengthy, I have placed the essay on a separate page, here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.