05 July 2025

How Do We Know How God Wants To Be Worshipped?

From One Peter Five. It's not a problem with the TLM. It's the same everywhere.

Worship looks very different from parish to parish. So is worship just a preference? How do we know how God wants to be worshipped? MASS CONFUSION (Ep 5) Featuring Timothy Flanders.

The Saint Who Holds the Key to Our AI Response

"Today’s AI systems can produce what appear to be empathic responses. ... These responses may sound convincingly human. But what they lack, Stein would insist, is presence."


From Aleteia

By Daniel Esparza

Delegating the work of emotional attention to a non-conscious system can erode the very skill we most need to preserve in a fractured world.

For Edith Stein (1891–1942), philosopher, Catholic convert, and eventual Carmelite nun, empathy is not merely an emotion nor a mental exercise in putting oneself in another’s shoes. In her early work On the Problem of Empathy (1917), Stein presents empathy as a unique kind of experience — one that is neither imagination nor inference. It is, in her words, a direct, intentional act of consciousness in which we are drawn into the emotional life of another while never losing sight of their distinct identity.

Stein observed that when we empathize, we do not copy or absorb another’s feelings. Instead, we perceive them with immediacy. We see the sorrow in a friend’s face and, in that very moment, we encounter the emotion — not as something we once felt ourselves, but as something freshly present in the other.

It is a first-person experience of someone else’s inner life. Crucially, empathy does not blur the lines between self and other. It allows us to remain ourselves, while genuinely entering, with care and restraint, into the lived experience of another. This balance — of nearness without appropriation — makes empathy not just an emotional act but an ethical one.

Later, as we process what we’ve experienced, we integrate our emotional perception with rational reflection. We begin to articulate and understand the nature of what the other is going through. For Stein, this fusion of affect and intellect forms the heart of intersubjectivity — the ground of true community.

Empathy and (or vs?) AI

In an age increasingly shaped by artificial intelligence, Stein’s insights carry both beauty and warning.

Today’s AI systems can produce what appear to be empathic responses. Chatbots can offer words of comfort, algorithms can detect sadness in a voice or hesitation in a text. These responses may sound convincingly human. But what they lack, Stein would insist, is presence.

The emotional language of AI, no matter how polished, is not rooted in a real lived engagement with another’s experience. It is imitation without consciousness.

That said, artificial intelligence can still serve, not substitute, empathy. AI tools can suggest gentler ways to phrase difficult truths, helping real people communicate with more compassion. When used this way — as an assistant rather than a replacement — AI can amplify and even fine-tune our capacity for attentiveness and care.

Yet the line between support and substitution is thin, and easy to cross.

There is a real risk that as we grow accustomed to machines simulating emotional presence, we might lose the habit of true empathic engagement. Delegating the work of emotional attention to a non-conscious system can erode the very skill we most need to preserve in a fractured world: the ability to see and respond to another’s pain not as data, but as presence.

Edith Stein’s vision of empathy is both demanding and liberating. It calls us not to feel for others in abstract, but to accompany them (and be accompanied) in reality — to encounter them as they are, with minds awake and hearts attuned.

Empathy in this sense is never merely efficient or functional. It is always an act of love. In a time of dazzling machines and fast answers, her thought reminds us that nothing can replace the depth of a truly human encounter.

Christian Martyrs: A Global War on the Cross of Christ

YoungHoon Kim: How the World’s Highest IQ Confirms the Harmony Between Science and Christian Doctrine

The man with the world's highest IQ is a Christian. But according to the Dawkinses, only ignorant people can be believers, or so they claim.

From Crisis

By Scott Ventureyra, STD

Advancements in science are pushing many to question a strict materialist view of human consciousness—including the man who has the highest IQ.

We live in an age when many scientists still clumsily reduce the mind to nothing more than neurochemical activity, namely, the mere interactions of neurons and neurotransmitters. Such scientists often react with hostility at even the suggestion that substance dualism might be true. Therefore, it is refreshing to witness the person with the world’s highest recorded IQ affirm what theologians, philosophers, and mystics have long understood: that consciousness cannot be reduced to mere matter. 

For over a century, prodigies like William James Sidis, whose estimated IQ approached 300, captivated the public imagination but left the deepest questions of life, matter, and mind unanswered. Today, Dr. YoungHoon Kim, whose IQ is reportedly verified at 276 and who holds a bachelor’s degree in theology (perhaps proof that the most intelligent begin with first things), recorded a message three months ago that has since gone viral on 𝕏 and other platforms, declaring: “Our consciousness continues beyond death, definitely.”

Kim has studied various subjects, including psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, philosophy, and theology. He has also received honorary doctorates in cognitive science, education, and psychology and held research positions at both Cambridge and Yale. This interdisciplinary approach has equipped him well to reflect deeply on the subjects of quantum information, consciousness, the afterlife, and God.

Unlike evolutionary biological models such as neo-Darwinism, which are often accompanied by the philosophical assumption held by many of their adherents (though not logically required by the theory itself) that consciousness ceases entirely once brain function stops, Dr. Kim appeals to quantum physics to argue that information never truly disappears but only changes form. He suggests that if consciousness is a kind of quantum information, it may persist beyond the death of the body, much like data stored in “the cloud”.

It is important to note that information is not bound to a single material medium. It can transfer across various substrates such as a USB key, hard drive, book, or brain without necessarily losing the essential informational content. Even when the material substrate is destroyed, the information it holds can persist. Since the revolutionary work of James Watson and Francis Crick in identifying the structure of DNA, it has become increasingly evident that biology is fundamentally governed by information systems.

This growing recognition of information’s primacy in biology has been a central focus of the Intelligent Design movement. Proponents of Intelligent Design, including William Dembski, Stephen Meyer, and Michael Behe, have increasingly highlighted the challenge that information theory presents to reductionist biology. This challenge has also been acknowledged by philosopher Thomas Nagel in Mind and Cosmos, where he argues that the materialist framework is fundamentally inadequate for explaining the origin of life and the emergence of consciousness.

More importantly, Kim’s public witness does not stop at quantum speculation. In a world that idolizes IQ tests and technocratic expertise, he openly confesses what so many refuse to say aloud: that Jesus Christ is divine. On 𝕏, where his words reached millions, he declared, “As the world’s highest IQ record holder, I believe that Jesus Christ is God, the way and the truth and the life.” In our day and age, to witness the world’s highest IQ holder publicly and willingly bend the knee to Jesus, an itinerant carpenter from the first century, is a stunning feat that surpasses any viral claim about quantum information or the reality of the afterlife, especially given our culture’s mistaken association of high intelligence with skepticism and nonbelief.

In my own writings, particularly in my book On the Origin of Consciousness and in one of my presentations for the 2020 Science of Consciousness conference, “AI, the Nature of Consciousness, Information, Reality and the Possibility of the Afterlife,” I have argued that materialist accounts of the mind are philosophically inadequate and can be rendered scientifically obsolete. If the mind is merely a by-product of electrochemical signals, then human freedom is an illusion, and so is any hope for meaning that transcends our brief biological existence. It is worth noting that over the past one hundred years, philosophical developments in the philosophy of religion, the philosophy of science, and the philosophy of mind—as well as scientific developments in the fields of cosmology, evolutionary biology, chemical evolution, and neuroscience—have increasingly pointed away from the scientific materialist paradigm.

Dr. Kim’s thought and public profession of faith align closely with the central trajectory of my own research. In my presentation at the 2020 Science of Consciousness conference, I argued that recent developments in artificial intelligence, information theory, and quantum physics have brought the question of the afterlife back into legitimate scientific and philosophical discourse. Kim’s analogy to quantum entanglement and the “cloud” strikingly parallels what I have long maintained: that information, in its most meaningful and structured forms, presupposes intention and is often indicative of mind. Quantum entanglement refers to a phenomenon in which two or more particles become linked so that, regardless of the distance separating them, the change in one simultaneously affects the other.

This broader metaphysical resonance is not unique to Kim. Theoretical physicist Michio Kaku has analogized the multiverse to numerous radio stations occupying the same space, each broadcasting on a different frequency. The implication of this comparison is that even though we perceive only one reality, others may coexist beyond our current perception. This “tuning” metaphor, like Kim’s “cloud” analogy, opens the conceptual space for consciousness to endure across dimensions not subject to physical decay once freed from the body.

Kim points out that quantum mechanics teaches that information never truly disappears but changes form. This aligns with the orchestrated objective reduction (Orch OR) theory developed by mathematical physicist Roger Penrose and anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff, which I discuss in my research. If consciousness emerges from quantum processes within the microtubules of neurons, it is plausible that it can persist beyond the dissolution of the brain. In other words, the self may survive the body’s decay by virtue of the deeper informational order inscribed into reality by the Creator.

If true, this insight refutes the most reductionist strands of scientific materialism. Even many atheists and futurists now toy with mind uploading or transhumanist hopes to escape death digitally. As I pointed out in my presentation, such visions wrestle with severe philosophical problems of identity and continuity. A digital copy is not you, just as a photograph is not a person. Yet Kim’s quantum perspective points to a better answer: consciousness as a unified, immaterial reality, grounded not in data storage devices and servers but in the very structure of the created order.

In Kim’s viral video, he provides a profound yet simple analogy of a video game avatar, whereby an avatar may disappear from the screen but the player persists. This example conveys a deep theological truth and the possibility that the soul survives physical death and can await the future resurrection, much like the empty tomb of Christ provides the historical context for this possibility.

Kim’s bold confession that Jesus is God further anchors these scientific clues that can be discovered through creation, including the evidence for the historicity of the Resurrection (a subject for another day). To the astute observer, it should be painfully obvious that science alone cannot explain why our minds can think beyond survival instincts, why we long for eternal happiness, or why we want to be truly known and loved forever. Only a personal God who invaded the physical time-space continuum can answer that. Kim reaffirmed this conviction when he posted just days later, “As the world’s highest IQ record holder, I believe the Bible is the perfect, eternal, and final Word of God. Therefore, the Bible doesn’t need to be updated. The world needs to catch up.” 

Such words should haunt both technocrats and the secular universities that consider themselves bastions of innovation and progress, aiming to reduce the common person’s ignorance more effectively than any interpretation of quantum theory and its potential implications for the afterlife could. The truth that Logos, the source of all creation, has stepped into history, faced death, and triumphed over it is not less credible because the world’s most brilliant living intellect says so; rather, it reminds us that true wisdom kneels before truth incarnate.

Our modern world could take several lessons away from Dr. Kim’s bold affirmation. First, if a mind like Kim says that consciousness cannot be reduced to neurons and openly confesses Christ as Savior, perhaps it’s time for nonbelievers and skeptics (within and outside of Christianity) who have contempt for Christianity and its truth claims to reconsider the dogmas we inherited from the Enlightenment. Second, those who support science and its amazing progress need not fear where evidence leads, even if it implies that mind and meaning are woven into the very fabric of the cosmos.

Lastly, believers should realize their hope is not in vain. If consciousness is not extinguished by death, but rather, transformed, then the grave does not have the final say. Our longing for meaning and reunion with those we love is not a juvenile desire but a signpost pointing us to reality’s deepest foundation.

At the end of his brief video message, Kim suggests that humanity will continue searching for the truth and evidence of the afterlife. I agree, but I would add that our search endures not simply out of mere curiosity or survival instinct but because we are made in the image and likeness of God. This divine imprint within us points beyond mere material existence. From the time we are born to the moment of death, we long to return home to our Source; as St. Augustine so profoundly expressed, our hearts are restless until they finally rest in Him.

As the late astronomer Robert Jastrow so perfectly summarized in his book God and the Astronomers, in light of Big Bang cosmology cracking open the door to God’s creative act, 

For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance, he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.


St Anthony Mary Zaccaria, Confessor

Today's Holy Mass from Corpus Christi Church, Tynong AUS. You may follow the Mass at Divinum Officium.

St Anthony Mary Zaccaria, Confessor ~ Dom Prosper Guéranger

St Anthony Mary Zaccaria, Confessor


From Dom Prosper Guéranger's Liturgical Year:

Later than Cajetan of Vicenza and earlier than Ignatius of Loyola, Anthony was called to be the father of one of those religious families which arose in such numbers during the sixteenth century to repair the ruins of the house of God. Lombardy, exhausted and demoralized by the wars for the possession of the duchy of Milan, was encouraged by the sight of the heroic virtues of Zaccaria to believe, hope and love once again. She listened to his fiery exhortations calling her to repentance, to meditation on the Passion and to more fervent devotion to, and more solemn adoration of, the Blessed Sacrament. (St. Anthony Mary Zaccaria was the first who exposed the sacred Host unveiled for the adoration of the faithful for forty hours, in memory of the time spent by our Savior in the tomb. This pious custom passed from Milan to become the practice of the whole Church, and allusion has been made elsewhere to its special significance during the three days immediately preceding Lent.) Thus he was truly the precursor of St. Charles Borromeo, who in his reform of the clergy, people and monasteries of Milan had as his earnest supporters Anthony’s sons and daughters, the Clerks Regular and the Angelic Sisters of St. Paul.

The Congregation began its life in the Oratory of Eternal Wisdom at Milan, but these new disciples of the doctor of the Gentiles took their name of Barnabites from the Church of St. Barnabas, to which they were moved shortly after the death of the saint and where his body rests. The Congregation soon spread, not only throughout Italy, but also into FranceAustriaSweden, and even as far as China and Burma. The sphere of its activities comprised mission work, instruction of youth and everything which furthers the work of God and the sanctification of souls. On the eve of the octave of the apostles SS. Peter and Paul in the year 1539, the holy founder of the congregation was called to his reward at the age of thirty-six in the very house in which he had been born and from the arms of his saintly mother who had brought him up for God, and who joined him shortly afterwards.

When Urban VIII published his famous decrees in the following century, the cultus of Anthony Mary had only been established for ninety-five years. Since these decrees required that the cultus should have been established for a century before, it could claim to have acquired the right of prescription, and since, on the other hand, the witnesses required for the regular canonization of the servant of God were not forthcoming, the cause was suspended. In 1890, however, Leo XIII reinstituted the cultus of Anthony Mary, and a few years later solemnly inscribed his name among the saints and extended his feast to the universal Church.

Anthony Mary Zaccaria was born of a noble family at Cremona in Lombardy, and even in childhood gave signs of his future sanctity. He was early distinguished for his virtues, piety towards God, devotion to the Blessed Virgin, and especially mercy towards the poor, in order to relieve whom he more than once gave his own rich clothing. He studied the humanities at home, and then went to Pavia for philosophy and Padua for medicine, and easily surpassed his contemporaries both in purity of life and in mental ability. After gaining his degree he returned home, where after understanding that God called him to the healing rather of souls than of bodies, he gave himself earnestly to sacred studies. Meanwhile he never ceased to visit the sick, instruct children in Christian doctrine, and exhort the young to piety and the elders to reformation of their lives. While saying his first Mass after his ordination, he is said to have been seen by the amazed congregation in a blaze of heavenly light and surrounded by angels. He then made it his chief care to labor for the salvation of souls and the reformation of manners. He received strangers, the poor and afflicted, with paternal charity, and consoled them with holy words and material assistance, so that his house was known as the refuge of the afflicted and he himself was called by his fellow-citizens an angel and the father of his country.

Thinking that he would be able to do more for the Christian religion if he had fellow-laborers in the Lord’s vineyard, he communicated his thoughts to two noble and saintly men, Bartholomew Ferrari and James Morigia, and together with them founded at Milan a society of Clerks Regular, which from his great love for the apostle of the Gentiles, he called after St. Paul. It was approved by Clement VII, confirmed by Paul III, and soon spread through many lands. He was also the founder and father of the Angelic Sisters. But he thought so humbly of himself that he would never be Superior of his own Order. So great was his patience that he endured with steadfastness the most terrible opposition to his religious. Such was his charity that he never ceased to exhort religious men to love God and priests to live after the manner of the Apostles, and he organized many confraternities of married men. He often carried the cross through the streets and public squares, together with his religious, and by his fervent prayers and exhortations brought wicked men back to the way of salvation.

It is noteworthy that out of love for Jesus crucified he would have the mystery of the cross brought to the mind of all by the ringing of the bell on Friday afternoon about vesper time. The holy name of Christ was ever on his lips, and in his writings, and as a true disciple of St. Paul, he ever bore the mortification of Christ in his body. He had a singular devotion to the Holy Eucharist, restored the custom of frequent communions, and is said to have introduced that of the public adoration of Forty Hours. Such was his love of purity that it seemed to restore life even to his lifeless body. He was also enriched with the heavenly gifts of ecstasy, tears, knowledge of future things, and the secrets of hearts and power over the enemy of mankind. At length, after many labors, he fell grievously sick at Guastalla, whither he had been summoned as arbitrator in the cause of peace. He was taken to Cremona, and died there amid the tears of his religious and in the embrace of his pious mother, whose approaching death he foretold. At the hour of his death, which took place on the third of the Nones of July, 1539, when he was thirty-six years of age, he was consoled by a vision of the apostles, and prophesied the future growth of his Society. The people began immediately to show their devotion to this saint on account of his great holiness and of his numerous miracles. The cult was approved by Leo XIII, who solemnly canonized him on Ascension Day, 1897.

During this octave of the holy apostles, thou dost appear, O faithful servant of God, as a precious jewel enriching their crown. From thy place of honor, whither the homage of the Church rises to thee, deign to bless those, who, like thee, are engaged, here below, in apostolic labors, without thought of self, without hope save in God, and without being discouraged by the havoc wrought by the ministers of Satan, who force them perpetually to make new beginnings.

In our days, as in thine, the enemies of the Church congratulate themselves upon the prospect of the speedy overthrow of the House of God, and now as formerly everything appears to justify their sinister hopes. However, in our days, as in thine, the teaching of the apostles, upheld by the example and prayers of the saints, is able to save the world. If more than ever the world can see only foolishness in the Cross and those who preach it, yet for all that, it is more than ever the power of God. (1 Corinthians 1:18) The saying, “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the prudence of the prudent I will reject” (1 Corinthians 1:19) is fulfilled once more before our eyes. At this moment where are the wise? Where are the learned and the clever (1 Corinthians 1:20) who promise to adapt the word of salvation to the needs of the present? Never to alter the Word of God, to announce it before God as God gives it, (2 Corinthians 2:17) without claiming to make it acceptable to those who insist upon being lost, (2 Corinthians 2:15-16) is to fulfill the first condition for gaining that triumph which St. Paul says will never be wanting to the faithful of Jesus Christ. (2 Corinthians 2:14)

Disciple and faithful follower of St. Paul, the knowledge of Christ learnt in his school changed thee from a doctor of the body into a pastor of souls; that love which surpasseth all knowledge (Ephesians 3:19) made thy short yet full life fruitful even beyond the grave. May God arouse in us that desire for the salvation of souls and spirit of reparation which the Church asks for by thy intercession. May thy sons and daughters drawn up under the apostolic banner do honor to the great name of the Doctor of the Gentiles.