From The Mad Monarchist (13 June 2011)
Based on my mail, some seem obsessed with having me say something nice, something positive, about republican leaders. I’m not entirely sure why. I don’t think I’ve been very ambiguous about the fact that I am a monarchist who thinks revolutionaries should be drug out into the street and shot, yet, tell some people you are a monarchist and they suddenly become determined to get you to say something nice about a president. Well, obviously, just because I don’t like politicians it does not mean I consider them all equally bad. For example, I believe we are all sinners but that doesn’t mean we are all mass murderers. I have also stated here before some republican leaders that I prefer over others. In my own country I think I have said that I prefer President Lamar to President Houston. I have also stated my respect for President Gabriel Garcia Moreno of Ecuador. Of course, Garcia Moreno was a monarchist and, believe it or not, he was not the first monarchist leader that the Republic of Ecuador ever had and, given that, I think the issue is one worth looking into.
Juan Jose Flores |
Arms used by Ecuadorian monarchists |
However, if this was
not ambitious enough, the General envisioned the Duke becoming, not King
of Ecuador alone, but King of the “United Kingdom of Ecuador, Peru and
Bolivia” reigning from Quito. Ideas for a union of South American
countries such as this was certainly not new (we all remember Gran
Colombia) and such ideas would linger for a while. However, General
Flores was also inspired by the monarchies which had made such
multi-national unions successful, citing the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Ireland and the Dual Empire of Austria-Hungary. This
proposed United Kingdom of Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia was also to include
the territory lost by Bolivia to Chile in the Pacific War. However,
again, nothing came of this plan as both Spain and Ecuador were beset by
a number of disasters. Leftist revolutionaries were a constant plague
to Ecuador, as in most other Latin American countries, and the real
influence of the Freemasons in this crisis cannot be ignored. It may be
fashionable to shrug off the Mason element as a “conspiracy theory” but
it was a real and immediate threat.
Napoleon III |
That element would be
the primary opponent of the aforementioned President Gabriel Garcia
Moreno who made the last serious effort to discuss the establishment of a
monarchy in Ecuador. In his time the idea revolved around making
Ecuador a protectorate of the theretofore successful Emperor Napoleon
III of the French. Garcia-Moreno wrote to the Emperor of the French
proposing this idea and similar plans were entertained by Napoleon III,
especially during the days of triumph at the height of the French
intervention in Mexico. With the Mexican Empire created under the
French-allied Emperor Maximilian, Napoleon III also envisioned an
expansion southward. France already had interest in Central America and
an idea for what became the Panama Canal and Napoleon III, encouraged by
the sympathetic President Gabriel Garcia Moreno, sometimes envisioned
moving into South America to create, based around Ecuador but expanding
beyond, a “Kingdom of the Andes”. However, the French Senate opposed
such an ambitious plan and in Ecuador support for the idea also dropped
off after the inglorious French evacuation from Mexico and Napoleon III
wavering in his support for Papal rule in Rome (the President of Ecuador
being a staunch supporter of the temporal power of the Pope). So, the
vision of Napoleon I of Ecuador and III of France, Emperor of the French
and King of Ecuador faded away.
Unfortunately, with the ending of this plan and the eventual assassination of Gabriel Garcia Moreno the cause of monarchy in Ecuador as a serious political possibility effectively came to an end. The story is not widely known, certainly not in the English-speaking world and yet the monarchist efforts in Ecuador were far from unusual. During the era of independence, the idea of ‘liberal monarchy’ had quite a large following throughout the emerging nations of Latin America. Brazil had a monarchy transplanted from Portugal, Mexico had General Agustin de Iturbide as the first Emperor of Mexico, in Argentina the first president, Bernardino Rivadavia, supported Juan Bautista Alberdi in his argument that monarchy was the best government for South America, Jose de San Martin supported the idea of a monarchy for Argentina and Peru and there were those who wanted Simon Bolivar to become monarch over a vast Latin American empire. It was not unusual and yet you will find very little mention of any of this today. For instance (here you can put my words to the test) you can go to Wikipedia and look up some of these individuals mentioned here, Flores, Rivadavia, Garcia-Moreno or Alberdi and you will not find a single mention of their monarchist sympathies. However, if you switch over to the Spanish-language Wikipedia you can find it (at least in some cases). For the most part, however, this is an issue that all of the prevailing powers want to ignore and completely erase from history. That, my friends, we cannot allow!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.