This paper explores Henri de Lubac’s Surnaturel and the way his thinking has been received and modified by two more speculatively inclined thinkers, John Milbank and Karl Rahner. It argues that one of these preserves, clarifies and strengthens the paradox at the heart of de Lubac’s contribution, while the other unhelpfully dissolves it. Discussions of nature and grace can take on the appearance of self-perpetuating debates spun loose from anything relevant to the Christian life. This paper tries to counter this tendency by exploring the significance of a (properly paradoxical) nature/grace framework for our demeanor towards our own death and the death of those we love
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Leo XIV as the Vicar of Christ, the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.