From One Peter Five
By Matthew Plese, TOP
The 1962 Missal suppressed various feast days about miracles.
Part I – The Roman Calendar in 1954: The Last Year of Wholeness
Part II – The Vigil of the Epiphany: the Forgotten Gateway to Christ’s Manifestation
Part IV – The Vigils of the Apostles: Apostolic Watchfulness and Penitential Preparation
Part V – The 1955 Holy Week Reform: a Summary
Part VI – The Pre-55 Paschal Feast of St. Joseph
Part VII — The Suppression of “Duplicate Feasts”: When Memory Was Simplified
As spring unfolds in the traditional Roman calendar, early May once formed a remarkable cluster of feasts tied to the Apostles and to the triumph of the Cross. Within the span of a single week, the Church commemorated the Finding of the Holy Cross on May 3, St. John Before the Latin Gate on May 6, and the Apparition of St. Michael on May 8. Each feast recalled a distinct historical event associated with saints or mysteries already honored elsewhere in the liturgical year.
During the liturgical reforms of the twentieth century, these observances were often dismissed as “duplicate feasts” because they commemorated saints or mysteries already present on the calendar under other titles. Yet the word “duplicate” obscures the true nature of these celebrations. They were not redundant repetitions but commemorations of specific moments in the life of the Church—moments that reinforced historical memory, deepened devotion, and connected the faithful to the unfolding drama of salvation history. Conspicuously, many of these suppressed feast days actually commemorated specific miracles, and thus the ancient calendar included these days in thanksgiving for specific miracles in history.
In the reform of the Roman calendar promulgated under Pope John XXIII in 1960, several of these feasts were removed from the universal calendar, including many that commemorated miracles. Later revisions following the Second Vatican Council rearranged the remaining commemorations even further. The result was not merely a simplified calendar but a diminished landscape of liturgical memory.
The Finding of the Holy Cross
The Feast of the Finding of the Holy Cross on May 3 commemorated the discovery of the True Cross by St. Helena in the fourth century. According to ancient Christian tradition, Helena—mother of Emperor Constantine—journeyed to Jerusalem and uncovered the Cross upon which Our Lord had been crucified. The event was seen as a providential confirmation of the triumph of Christianity following centuries of persecution.
For this reason, the Roman Church historically commemorated the Cross twice each year. On September 14, the Exaltation of the Holy Cross celebrated the dedication of the Basilica of the Holy Sepulchre and the later recovery of the Cross from Persian captivity. The May 3 feast honored its discovery. Each feast highlighted a different chapter in the Church’s encounter with the instrument of our redemption.
In addition to commemorating the discovery itself, the May feast became associated with a number of popular customs throughout Catholic Europe. Among the most notable was the traditional “Holy Cross weather blessing.” In many places the faithful prayed special blessings for crops and favorable weather around this feast, invoking the protection of the Cross upon the land. The season of early May marked the beginning of the agricultural growing period in much of Europe, and the liturgical commemoration of the Cross naturally became linked to prayers for the fruits of the earth. The Cross was invoked not only as the sign of salvation but as a blessing upon creation itself.
From the perspective of twentieth-century reformers, the existence of two feasts dedicated to the Cross appeared unnecessary. In the 1960 reform of the Roman calendar, the Finding of the Holy Cross was suppressed from the universal calendar. The Exaltation in September remained as the sole universal feast honoring the Cross.
Yet the earlier tradition had preserved both moments deliberately. The discovery of the Cross and its later exaltation represented two distinct chapters in Christian history. The older calendar allowed both memories to live within the Church’s annual cycle. The suppression of the May feast therefore represented not merely the removal of a liturgical redundancy but the quiet disappearance of one of Christianity’s most evocative historical commemorations.
St. John Before the Latin Gate
Another May observance lost in the twentieth-century reforms was the Feast of St. John Before the Latin Gate, formerly celebrated on May 6. This feast commemorated the ancient tradition that the Apostle John was arrested in Rome during the persecution of Emperor Domitian and brought to the Latin Gate, where he was condemned to death by being plunged into a vat of boiling oil.
According to early Christian accounts, the Apostle miraculously survived the ordeal unharmed. Rather than dying, he emerged from the cauldron uninjured, bearing witness to Christ through miraculous deliverance. Though he did not die at that moment, the Church honored the event as a testimony to his heroic fidelity and to God’s protection of the beloved disciple.
The site of this event became a place of Christian memory in Rome, where the church of San Giovanni a Porta Latina preserves the tradition. The feast therefore commemorated not merely the Apostle himself but a specific episode of persecution within the early Church. It reminded the faithful that the Apostles endured suffering, imprisonment, and trial long before the Church emerged victorious.
In the reform of the Roman calendar in 1960, this feast was removed from the universal calendar. St. John continued to be honored principally on December 27 within the Octave of Christmas. Yet the earlier commemoration on May 6 preserved a vivid episode in the life of the Apostle that illustrated the courage of the early Church under persecution. Its disappearance removed from the calendar one of the dramatic stories through which generations of Catholics had encountered the witness of the Apostles.
The Apparition of St. Michael
The Feast of the Apparition of St. Michael the Archangel, celebrated on May 8, commemorated a tradition dating to the early centuries of Christianity. According to ancient accounts, St. Michael appeared on Mount Gargano in southern Italy, marking the place where a sanctuary would later be built in his honor. The shrine quickly became one of the most important pilgrimage sites dedicated to the Archangel in the Western Church.
Devotion to St. Michael from Mount Gargano spread throughout Europe, influencing later shrines and liturgical traditions dedicated to the Archangel. The event played an important role in strengthening devotion to the heavenly protector of the Church.
This feast did not replace the principal feast of St. Michael on September 29. The September celebration commemorates the dedication of the Archangel’s basilica on the Via Salaria in Rome, while the May feast preserved the memory of the apparition associated with Mount Gargano. The two feasts together reflected the Church’s traditional instinct to commemorate multiple moments in the unfolding history of divine intervention.
In the 1960 reform of the calendar, the Feast of the Apparition of St. Michael was removed from the universal calendar. While devotion to the Archangel continued, the historical event associated with Mount Gargano was no longer commemorated annually in the Church’s liturgical life.
When “Duplicate” Feasts Disappear
The removal of these feasts was motivated in part by a desire to simplify the calendar and eliminate what reformers considered unnecessary repetition. If a saint or mystery already possessed a principal feast, additional commemorations were increasingly regarded as redundant.
Yet the older Roman calendar had never treated repetition as a defect. Instead, it recognized that sacred memory deepens through recurrence. Just as Sacred Scripture recounts the mysteries of salvation from multiple perspectives, the liturgy often returned to the same saints and events under different aspects.
The Finding of the Cross recalled discovery; the Exaltation celebrated triumph. St. John the Evangelist was honored both for his apostolic witness in December and for his miraculous deliverance from martyrdom in May. St. Michael was commemorated both in connection with Rome and with Mount Gargano. Each feast added another layer to the Church’s memory.
When such feasts disappeared, the calendar did indeed become simpler. But it also became thinner. A the memory of great miracles diminished.
The Reorganization of Apostolic Feasts
The suppression of the Finding of the Holy Cross had an additional consequence. In the later reform of the General Roman Calendar following the Second Vatican Council, the feast of Sts. Philip and James—which had already been displaced from May 1 in the 1955 reform—was transferred again, this time to May 3, the date formerly occupied by the Finding of the Cross.
Thus, within a generation the feast of these Apostles has been moved twice: first from May 1 to May 11 in the reform of 1955, and later to May 3 in the post-conciliar calendar after the suppression of the May feast of the Holy Cross. These shifts illustrate how the calendar itself was increasingly reorganized according to principles of simplification and structural efficiency.
In the traditional calendar, feasts had developed gradually over centuries, acquiring their places through historical circumstance and devotional practice. The reforms of the twentieth century increasingly treated these placements as adjustable elements within a redesigned system.
Memory and the Structure of the Calendar
The older Roman calendar functioned not merely as a schedule of devotions but as a vast structure of memory. It preserved episodes from the lives of saints, moments in the history of the Church, and milestones in the unfolding of salvation history. Some feasts commemorated doctrines, others historical events, and still others miraculous interventions.
The so-called duplicate feasts belonged to this architecture of remembrance. They reminded the faithful that the lives of the saints and the history of the Church could not be reduced to a single moment or title. Each commemoration opened another window into the mystery.
Important events in the life of the Church were therefore commemorated separately, even when they involved the same saint or mystery. Such feasts were not considered redundant but complementary. Each one preserved another chapter of the Church’s story and invited the faithful to contemplate the mystery from a different angle.
When these feasts were removed in the name of simplification, the calendar lost some of that narrative richness. The Church continued to honor the same saints—but fewer chapters of their stories were told.
Conclusion
The disappearance of feasts such as the Finding of the Holy Cross, St. John Before the Latin Gate, and the Apparition of St. Michael illustrates how the twentieth-century reforms reshaped not only the ceremonies of the Roman Rite but also its memory.
The goal of simplification was understandable. Yet the older calendar had never been designed for efficiency. It was designed to teach, to remember, and to immerse the faithful in the full breadth of Christian history.
In early May, the traditional liturgical year once invited Catholics to contemplate the discovery of the Cross, the suffering of the Apostles, and the intervention of the Archangel. These feasts formed a small but meaningful constellation within the Church’s memory.
Their disappearance reminds us that the liturgy does not merely mark time. It preserves the past, shapes devotion, and transmits the Church’s collective story from one generation to the next. And when particular memories vanish from the calendar, they gradually fade from the consciousness of the faithful as well.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Leo XIV as the Vicar of Christ, the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.