The Archaeological Evidence for Real Presence That Protestants Ignore Most Protestants believe the Real Presence was invented at the 1215 medieval council. But then why did a 2nd century bishop carve his Eucharistic faith onto his own tombstone? Bishop Abercius writing around 190 AD declared on his grave marker that faith gave him "the fish Christ as food mixed with wine and bread." 📌 The Point: If the Eucharist were only a symbol, early Christian behavior makes no sense. The stones cry out - and they testify that Christ meant what He said. 📖 Core Sources The Inscriptions: Epitaph of Abercius (c. 190 AD): "Faith provided as food the fish of exceeding great size and pure, whom the spotless virgin caught from a fountain, and gives to friends to eat, having excellent wine, giving the mixed cup with bread" Pectorius Inscription (c. 290 AD): Instructs believers to "eat with joy and desire, holding the fish in your hands" - a direct reference to receiving communion. These were public declarations read by entire communities, not private theology. Church Fathers Who Knew the Apostles: St. Ignatius of Antioch (c. 107 AD, disciple of Apostle John): Confronting heretics - "They abstained from the Eucharist because they confess not the Eucharist to be the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, which suffered for our sins." Logic: if Christ truly took flesh, He can truly give us His flesh. St. Justin Martyr (c. 151 AD): Writing to the Roman Emperor - "Not as common bread and common drink do we receive these... the food blessed by the prayer of his word is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh." Plain statement to pagans, not insider mystical language. Physical Evidence: Special vessels (chalices, patens, pyxes) in precious materials to hold the Eucharist Pope Zephyrinus (c. 199 AD): decreed Eucharist received in glass vessels Pope Urban I (c. 222 AD): ordered sacred vessels made of silver or gold Dove-shaped receptacles and pyxes designed specifically to safeguard the Eucharist in use centuries before 1215 Eucharistic scenes painted in Roman catacombs Scripture: Matthew 26v26-28 - "This is my body... This is my blood of the covenant" John 6 - "Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you" - many disciples left; Jesus let them go rather than clarify it was symbolic ⛪ Catholic Teaching Council of Trent (1551): Christ is present truly, really, and substantially - condemned views reducing the Eucharist to a mere sign or figure. CCC on Real Presence: Christ's presence is called "real" not to exclude other presences, but to indicate presence par excellence - whole and entire, God and man, substantially and permanently. 🛡️ Objections Answered "Jesus used symbolic language all the time - 'I am the vine,' 'I am the door'"? Context matters. The Eucharist is embedded in covenant and liturgical action in Passover-style words. Ignatius and Justin, writing within decades of the apostles, interpret these words realistically - suggesting the church closest to the source understood them that way. "How can bread be Christ without absurdity"? Catholic doctrine doesn't claim the appearances become fleshly in a crude empirical way - it teaches a sacramental mode of presence where what faith confesses differs from what senses perceive. The Strongest Evidence of All: Eastern Orthodox, Coptic, Syrian, and Armenian churches - separated from Rome centuries before the Reformation with zero institutional contact for over a thousand years - all maintain identical belief in the Real Presence. If this were a medieval Catholic invention, how did they preserve the same teaching? 📺 Chapters 0:00 - Bishop Abercius: Eucharistic Faith Carved in Stone (c. 190 AD) 2:22 - Ignatius of Antioch & Justin Martyr: Apostolic Testimony 3:56 - Catholic Teaching: Real Presence (CCC, Council of Trent) 5:06 - Sacred Vessels, Tabernacles, Reservation Practices 6:53 - Objections: Symbolic Language, Adoration = Idolatry? 8:08 - Orthodox, Coptic, Syrian Churches: Same Teaching, Zero Rome Contact 🌐 Connect 📿 https://totuscatholica.org/rosary 🌍 https://totuscatholica.org/ ✉️ https://totuscatholica.org/contact 🔍 https://catholicexaminationofconscien... 💬 Question If Real Presence were a medieval invention, why do Eastern Orthodox, Coptic, Syrian, and Armenian churches - separated from Rome for over a thousand years - all teach the same thing? And why would Christians who died rather than worship Caesar carve their Eucharistic faith onto their own tombstones?
26 February 2026
Why This 1,800-Year-Old Tombstone Debunks Protestantism
From Totus Catholica
The Archaeological Evidence for Real Presence That Protestants Ignore Most Protestants believe the Real Presence was invented at the 1215 medieval council. But then why did a 2nd century bishop carve his Eucharistic faith onto his own tombstone? Bishop Abercius writing around 190 AD declared on his grave marker that faith gave him "the fish Christ as food mixed with wine and bread." 📌 The Point: If the Eucharist were only a symbol, early Christian behavior makes no sense. The stones cry out - and they testify that Christ meant what He said. 📖 Core Sources The Inscriptions: Epitaph of Abercius (c. 190 AD): "Faith provided as food the fish of exceeding great size and pure, whom the spotless virgin caught from a fountain, and gives to friends to eat, having excellent wine, giving the mixed cup with bread" Pectorius Inscription (c. 290 AD): Instructs believers to "eat with joy and desire, holding the fish in your hands" - a direct reference to receiving communion. These were public declarations read by entire communities, not private theology. Church Fathers Who Knew the Apostles: St. Ignatius of Antioch (c. 107 AD, disciple of Apostle John): Confronting heretics - "They abstained from the Eucharist because they confess not the Eucharist to be the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, which suffered for our sins." Logic: if Christ truly took flesh, He can truly give us His flesh. St. Justin Martyr (c. 151 AD): Writing to the Roman Emperor - "Not as common bread and common drink do we receive these... the food blessed by the prayer of his word is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh." Plain statement to pagans, not insider mystical language. Physical Evidence: Special vessels (chalices, patens, pyxes) in precious materials to hold the Eucharist Pope Zephyrinus (c. 199 AD): decreed Eucharist received in glass vessels Pope Urban I (c. 222 AD): ordered sacred vessels made of silver or gold Dove-shaped receptacles and pyxes designed specifically to safeguard the Eucharist in use centuries before 1215 Eucharistic scenes painted in Roman catacombs Scripture: Matthew 26v26-28 - "This is my body... This is my blood of the covenant" John 6 - "Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you" - many disciples left; Jesus let them go rather than clarify it was symbolic ⛪ Catholic Teaching Council of Trent (1551): Christ is present truly, really, and substantially - condemned views reducing the Eucharist to a mere sign or figure. CCC on Real Presence: Christ's presence is called "real" not to exclude other presences, but to indicate presence par excellence - whole and entire, God and man, substantially and permanently. 🛡️ Objections Answered "Jesus used symbolic language all the time - 'I am the vine,' 'I am the door'"? Context matters. The Eucharist is embedded in covenant and liturgical action in Passover-style words. Ignatius and Justin, writing within decades of the apostles, interpret these words realistically - suggesting the church closest to the source understood them that way. "How can bread be Christ without absurdity"? Catholic doctrine doesn't claim the appearances become fleshly in a crude empirical way - it teaches a sacramental mode of presence where what faith confesses differs from what senses perceive. The Strongest Evidence of All: Eastern Orthodox, Coptic, Syrian, and Armenian churches - separated from Rome centuries before the Reformation with zero institutional contact for over a thousand years - all maintain identical belief in the Real Presence. If this were a medieval Catholic invention, how did they preserve the same teaching? 📺 Chapters 0:00 - Bishop Abercius: Eucharistic Faith Carved in Stone (c. 190 AD) 2:22 - Ignatius of Antioch & Justin Martyr: Apostolic Testimony 3:56 - Catholic Teaching: Real Presence (CCC, Council of Trent) 5:06 - Sacred Vessels, Tabernacles, Reservation Practices 6:53 - Objections: Symbolic Language, Adoration = Idolatry? 8:08 - Orthodox, Coptic, Syrian Churches: Same Teaching, Zero Rome Contact 🌐 Connect 📿 https://totuscatholica.org/rosary 🌍 https://totuscatholica.org/ ✉️ https://totuscatholica.org/contact 🔍 https://catholicexaminationofconscien... 💬 Question If Real Presence were a medieval invention, why do Eastern Orthodox, Coptic, Syrian, and Armenian churches - separated from Rome for over a thousand years - all teach the same thing? And why would Christians who died rather than worship Caesar carve their Eucharistic faith onto their own tombstones?
The Archaeological Evidence for Real Presence That Protestants Ignore Most Protestants believe the Real Presence was invented at the 1215 medieval council. But then why did a 2nd century bishop carve his Eucharistic faith onto his own tombstone? Bishop Abercius writing around 190 AD declared on his grave marker that faith gave him "the fish Christ as food mixed with wine and bread." 📌 The Point: If the Eucharist were only a symbol, early Christian behavior makes no sense. The stones cry out - and they testify that Christ meant what He said. 📖 Core Sources The Inscriptions: Epitaph of Abercius (c. 190 AD): "Faith provided as food the fish of exceeding great size and pure, whom the spotless virgin caught from a fountain, and gives to friends to eat, having excellent wine, giving the mixed cup with bread" Pectorius Inscription (c. 290 AD): Instructs believers to "eat with joy and desire, holding the fish in your hands" - a direct reference to receiving communion. These were public declarations read by entire communities, not private theology. Church Fathers Who Knew the Apostles: St. Ignatius of Antioch (c. 107 AD, disciple of Apostle John): Confronting heretics - "They abstained from the Eucharist because they confess not the Eucharist to be the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, which suffered for our sins." Logic: if Christ truly took flesh, He can truly give us His flesh. St. Justin Martyr (c. 151 AD): Writing to the Roman Emperor - "Not as common bread and common drink do we receive these... the food blessed by the prayer of his word is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh." Plain statement to pagans, not insider mystical language. Physical Evidence: Special vessels (chalices, patens, pyxes) in precious materials to hold the Eucharist Pope Zephyrinus (c. 199 AD): decreed Eucharist received in glass vessels Pope Urban I (c. 222 AD): ordered sacred vessels made of silver or gold Dove-shaped receptacles and pyxes designed specifically to safeguard the Eucharist in use centuries before 1215 Eucharistic scenes painted in Roman catacombs Scripture: Matthew 26v26-28 - "This is my body... This is my blood of the covenant" John 6 - "Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you" - many disciples left; Jesus let them go rather than clarify it was symbolic ⛪ Catholic Teaching Council of Trent (1551): Christ is present truly, really, and substantially - condemned views reducing the Eucharist to a mere sign or figure. CCC on Real Presence: Christ's presence is called "real" not to exclude other presences, but to indicate presence par excellence - whole and entire, God and man, substantially and permanently. 🛡️ Objections Answered "Jesus used symbolic language all the time - 'I am the vine,' 'I am the door'"? Context matters. The Eucharist is embedded in covenant and liturgical action in Passover-style words. Ignatius and Justin, writing within decades of the apostles, interpret these words realistically - suggesting the church closest to the source understood them that way. "How can bread be Christ without absurdity"? Catholic doctrine doesn't claim the appearances become fleshly in a crude empirical way - it teaches a sacramental mode of presence where what faith confesses differs from what senses perceive. The Strongest Evidence of All: Eastern Orthodox, Coptic, Syrian, and Armenian churches - separated from Rome centuries before the Reformation with zero institutional contact for over a thousand years - all maintain identical belief in the Real Presence. If this were a medieval Catholic invention, how did they preserve the same teaching? 📺 Chapters 0:00 - Bishop Abercius: Eucharistic Faith Carved in Stone (c. 190 AD) 2:22 - Ignatius of Antioch & Justin Martyr: Apostolic Testimony 3:56 - Catholic Teaching: Real Presence (CCC, Council of Trent) 5:06 - Sacred Vessels, Tabernacles, Reservation Practices 6:53 - Objections: Symbolic Language, Adoration = Idolatry? 8:08 - Orthodox, Coptic, Syrian Churches: Same Teaching, Zero Rome Contact 🌐 Connect 📿 https://totuscatholica.org/rosary 🌍 https://totuscatholica.org/ ✉️ https://totuscatholica.org/contact 🔍 https://catholicexaminationofconscien... 💬 Question If Real Presence were a medieval invention, why do Eastern Orthodox, Coptic, Syrian, and Armenian churches - separated from Rome for over a thousand years - all teach the same thing? And why would Christians who died rather than worship Caesar carve their Eucharistic faith onto their own tombstones?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Leo XIV as the Vicar of Christ, the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.