With Francesco Binotto, PhD, Lecturer at the University of Urbino (Italy), Department of Humanities.
Late thirteenth- and early fourteenth-thinkers address the question of what the proper object of the intellect is. In my contribution, I intend to compare Thomas Aquinas's and Hervaeus Natalis's accounts of the first and proper object of the intellect. While Aquinas holds that the intellect's proper object is the quiddity of material things, Hervaeus states that it is the accident (and precisely bodily quantity) that plays the role of the first and proper object of the intellect. My aim is to bring to light the assumptions from which these two accounts follow and the reasons why Hervaeus takes a different direction from Aquinas.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.