With William Carroll, PhD, Senior Research Fellow, Collegium of Anton Neuwirth (Bratislava, Slovakia).
For many, there seems to be a strict disjunction: either we seek to explain the origin of life in terms of purely natural processes or we appeal to some kind of divine intervention that bridges the distinction between the non-living and the living. Must one accept the need to choose between natural and divine causality in explaining the origin of life? Are the causes that exist in the natural order sufficiently robust to explain the origin of living things? What is the relationship between divine causality and the causality of creatures in addressing this question? In particular, does the analysis of natural causes and creation set forth by Thomas Aquinas provide the basis for an adequate explanation of the initial emergence of life?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.