From Fr Z's Blog
Former Irish President says infant baptism is a form of coercion
I read at the NCRegister that former Irish President Mary McAleese thinks that infant baptism is a violation of human rights.
Baptizing babies, she said, makes “infant conscripts who are held to lifelong obligations of obedience.”
She is, apparently, working on a Canon Law degree with the Jesuits in Rome. Jesuits. Now she thinks she has come up with something.
More of her wisdom:
“Let’s be frank about it, very little of the magisterium — there are elements of it that are obviously infallible, things like the teaching on Christ and his divinity; but there are other things that over many, many centuries were taught with great passion that quietly now have been abandoned by the very magisterium that taught them.”McAleese, who has previously advocated publicly for ending abortion restrictions in Ireland, same-sex “marriage” and women’s ordination to the priesthood, drew headlines earlier this year when she spoke March 8 at a women’s conference in Rome held outside the Vatican.
Of course the Church has some important things to say about the importance of baptism and its connection with…well… you know… salvation.
While God cannot be limited in any way, and it is possible for God to save whom it pleaseth Him to save, with or without baptism, we don’t know exactly how it works without baptism. We read in the Catechism of the Catholic Church:
1257 The Lord himself affirms that Baptism is necessary for salvation. He also commands his disciples to proclaim the Gospel to all nations and to baptize them. Baptism is necessary for salvation for those to whom the Gospel has been proclaimed and who have had the possibility of asking for this sacrament. The Church does not know of any means other than Baptism that assures entry into eternal beatitude; this is why she takes care not to neglect the mission she has received from the Lord to see that all who can be baptized are “reborn of water and the Spirit.” God has bound salvation to the sacrament of Baptism, but he himself is not bound by his sacraments.
While there are other sorts of baptism (e.g., desire, blood) baptism with water and the Trinitarian form is normative.
Infants, being human beings, are from conception guilty of Original Sin. Baptism forgives that Sin and sanctifies the soul.
Infants may not have the same developed intellect and use of will that adults have, but that doesn’t mean that they don’t have the effects of the sacrament of baptism.
Keeping in mind that under the old covenant infant males were circumcised, so to it seems consistent that infants be baptized.
Can. 867 §2 says: “If the infant is in danger of death, it is to be baptized without any delay.”
There is a 1980 Instruction on Infant Baptism from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
John 3:5: “Amen, amen I say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.