From Rorate Cæli
By Rorate contributor Kenneth Wolfe:
Pining for the Latin Mass: Reflecting on major changes to the Catholic liturgy, 50 years later
By KENNETH J. WOLFE
NOV 30, 2019 | 5:00 AM
Fifty years ago this weekend, the Catholic Church debuted a new version
of Mass following reforms made by the 1960s’ Second Vatican Council.
From the use of vernacular language instead of Latin, to the priest
facing the people instead of the tabernacle, the changes became
mandatory at all parishes on the First Sunday of Advent 1969.
There was high-level resistance to replacing the traditional Latin Mass
with a new version. Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani, who headed and served
for 32 years in the highest doctrinal office at the Vatican (later
succeeded by Joseph Ratzinger, who would become Pope Benedict XVI),
wrote an intervention in 1969 entitled “Short Critical Study on the New
Order of Mass.” In it, he, joined by another cardinal and several
liturgical experts, warned “fresh changes in the liturgy could lead to
nothing but complete bewilderment on the part of the faithful.”
The Pope at the time was convinced radical liturgical innovation was
needed. Addressing his Mass alterations in November 1969, Pope Paul VI
stated: “The results expected, or rather desired, are that the faithful
will participate in the liturgical mystery with more understanding, in a
more practical, a more enjoyable and a more sanctifying way.”
The results were the opposite. Since the 1960s, Mass attendance has
plummeted, from around 70% of U.S. Catholics every Sunday and Holy Day
before the liturgical changes, to 21% of U.S. Catholics currently
attending weekly Mass. In other countries, including much of Western
Europe, the number can be in the single digits.
But after five decades of experiments and decline, there is some growth
to be observed within the Catholic Church. Ironically, it is with
traditionalists joining the priesthood, entering convents and attending
parishes that offer the very Latin Mass that was replaced 50 years ago.
One such society of clergy, the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter, has
seen growth even in the otherwise turbulent past year, including a
doubling of attendance at its Los Angeles parish, with new churches
being established each year that quickly fill up with hundreds of
families attending the old Mass. Its seminaries, completely full, often
turn away applicants — a challenge shared by almost no diocese or
religious order in 2019.
Interestingly, this growth in tradition — particularly among young
Catholics — has occurred while Pope Francis has moved in the completely
opposite direction during his nearly seven years in Rome. The Jesuit
pope has chastised traditionally minded Catholics numerous times,
including saying: “I always try to understand what is behind those
individuals who are too young to have lived the pre-Conciliar liturgy,
and who want it nonetheless.
“I have at times found myself in front of people who are too rigid, an
attitude of rigidity. And I ask myself: how come so much rigidity? You
dig, you dig, this rigidity always hides something: insecurity, at times
perhaps something else.” This was said by the same Francis who, when
asked about homosexual priests, replied “Who am I to judge?”
The resurgence of the traditional Latin Mass started before Francis, but
has seen unprecedented growth during his papacy, a counterrevolution of
sorts that some (both admirably and critically) call an alternative
Francis effect. Even bishops and priests who were not ordinarily
interested in the traditional Latin Mass have been much more generous
and vocal in offering additional such liturgies. Two distinct wings of
the Catholic Church have emerged. Often, the new versus the old Mass is a
defining characteristic of the opposing coalitions.
The past 50 years have not been good ones for the Catholic Church. Pope
Benedict saw this when he wrote, of the new form of Mass, “we abandoned
the organic, living process of growth and development over centuries,
and replaced it — as in a manufacturing process — with a fabrication, a
banal on-the-spot product.”
How the hierarchy of the Church deals with “those individuals who are
too young to have lived the pre-Conciliar liturgy, and who want it
nonetheless” is a question they have not yet begun to answer.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.