Avicenna (Ibn Sina) propounds an epistemology that is largely dependent on emanation from a single, separate, and eternal intellect, the Active Intellect (AI). Quite generally, he argues that the AI, which is fully actual, is necessary to move our merely potential intellects into actuality. Though I argue that he is closer to Thomas Aquinas than the latter thought, at least with respect to our first acquisition of intelligibles through abstraction, the two still disagree regarding previously known intelligibles: Avicenna denies that intelligibles can be stored in first actuality in the human intellect, while Aquinas affirms it. But Avicenna's reasons are quite faithfully Aristotelian, and it is difficult to see why and how Aquinas can oppose them.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to deletion if they are not germane. I have no problem with a bit of colourful language, but blasphemy or depraved profanity will not be allowed. Attacks on the Catholic Faith will not be tolerated. Comments will be deleted that are republican (Yanks! Note the lower case 'r'!), attacks on the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the Vicar of Christ (I know he's a material heretic and a Protector of Perverts, and I definitely want him gone yesterday! However, he is Pope, and I pray for him every day.), the legitimacy of the House of Windsor or of the claims of the Elder Line of the House of France, or attacks on the legitimacy of any of the currently ruling Houses of Europe.